Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 September 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 25 September 27 >

September 26

[edit]

Template:KeptDRV

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deleted Template:KeptDRV per Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 September 22#Template:KeptDRV, deleted Template:Keptdrv, a redirect to it. delldot ∇. 21:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:KeptDRV (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused DRV template created by sockpuppet. (Would an admin please post {{subst:tfdnotice|KeptDRV}} ~~~~ at User talk:Solumeiras. The notice is for others reviewing that talk page and not so much for the blocked user. Thanks) -- Suntag ☼ 14:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's also Template:Keptdrv, which is a redirect to the above. Cheers. lifebaka++ 16:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pink singles

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete delldot ∇. 00:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pink singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is no reason for this to exist. There is already a Pink template and this is all duplicate information. eo (talk) 13:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ligat ha'Al 2009/10 table

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete delldot ∇. 00:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ligat ha'Al 2009/10 table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Violation of WP:CRYSTAL; the season will begin in a year. Further, no articles link to this template. Hockey-holic (talk) 11:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Allie Jean Dimeco

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 00:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Allie Jean Dimeco (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A template created by a new user apparently duplicating the article Allie DiMeco. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think I figured them out now. The instructions say not to subst, but show a subst, and they have a whole lot of extra brackets. They don't say you only need to put {{tfd|Articlename}}. If that is correct, I hope someone will fix, because I fiddled forever to try to make this nom. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:25, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:24CleanupFlag

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --WoohookittyWoohoo! 09:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:24CleanupFlag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I don't see why this WikiProject should have its own cleanup tags, and I don't think it's a good precedent. delldot ∇. 01:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree with deletion. Maybe it is a way for the project to control its progress. But I think a list in the project page is much better than having different templates, difficult for people not participating in the project to add or handle. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi Support. Perhaps if the 24 WP needs the template in order to populate their internal cleanup category, they could just use a null template to quickly add the cat? Prince of Canada t | c 00:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
One of the people participating in the project wrote above and said they don't need them anymore. All other templates used by the project are to delete. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just copying from above: "Magioladitis is correct, that is the reason they were originally created. I am the current project leader and I agree these aren't necessary - it's just the same template as {{Plot}} but with a 24 logo basically. There's three other ones ({{24Trivia}}, {{24CleanupFlag}}, {{24-in-universe}}) that should also be converted over to the standard cleanup tags and then deleted. SeanMooney (talk) 23:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)" -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is this response to me or Lucy-marie?. Mythdon (talk) 10:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To Lucy-Marie of course. :) -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Was you trying to give out a better explanation for Lucy-marie than my explanation?. Mythdon (talk) 10:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To support your explanation. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_September_26&oldid=1138693105"