Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 March 5
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2008 March 5)
March 5
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was no consensus. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
I made them myself and I renamed them to Month3/2 (etc) to keep templates and subtemplates together. AFAIK they are no more used (the link "What links here" appears to produce obsolete results) HandigeHarry (talk) 11:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Template:JanuaryCalendar2004Source
- Template:JanuaryCalendar2005
- Template:JanuaryCalendar2005Source
- Template:TFAforJanuary2005
- Template:JanuaryCalendar2005SourceLinkTo2005
- Template:JanuaryCalendar2005SourceNoLinkTo2005
- Template:JanuaryCalendar2006
- Template:JanuaryCalendar2006Source
- Template:JanuaryCalendar2006SourceLinkTo2006
- Template:JanuaryCalendar2006SourceNoLinkTo2006
- Template:JanuaryCalendar2007
- Template:JanuaryCalendar2007Source
- Template:JanuaryCalendar2009Source
- Template:JanuaryCalendar2010Source
The single template:Month3 looks much better - and it is not a host of templates. There are many more of these, so it's a tedious job. HandigeHarry (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: The January2007 templates are still used in at least 31 of the Portal:Music/DateOfBirth/January 1 articles. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:29, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Used to be HandigeHarry (talk) 18:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose until the issues raised on Template talk:Month3#Smarter template and Template talk:Month3#Leap year are resolved. The short answer is that Template:Month3 does not have all the required necessary features to completely replace the proposed templates for deletion. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 21:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC) - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.