Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 March 3
March 3
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Depricated. Project has been merged in to WP:Hockey as a task force. No longer will need this template as a variable has been added to the WP:Hockey template that will accomplish the same thing. — Djsasso (talk) 22:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment why not just redirect it? 70.55.84.89 (talk) 05:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Because no page is using it, and because if there were pages using it then it would result in two of the same templates on talk pages. -Djsasso (talk) 15:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete. Good lord that was a lot of expanding templates. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
WP:NOT not a directory to "find a Christian Church". — SECisek (talk) 20:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Related category also up for deletion at CFD. --Lquilter (talk) 21:04, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. No need for it, and duplicates the List of Christian denominations. Tb (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:NOT Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 07:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nomination. Steve Crossin (talk) 07:28, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
See also WP:Articles for deletion/Christian church directory. Tb (talk) 20:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
This appears to be an article written in the template namespace. I didn't find a suitable speedy criterion to apply. — ... discospinster talk 20:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was userfy per WP:UBM. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
This seems to be more suitable to the creator's userspace and created in series (Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced and Native).. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 10:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Template:diff takes the same parameters, does the same job, and is much more popular. I recommend changing all existing uses of {{diff-two}} to {{diff}} and deleting Template:diff-two. —AlanBarrett 11:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Template:diff, given the right parameters, does the same job. {{diff-cur}} is used exactly once, on a page that appears to be a list of all available templates. —AlanBarrett 11:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.