Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 July 15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 15

[edit]


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PPT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

LIttle used template which seems intended to be used at the top of category pages (see Category:Frelinghuysen family), which adds the text "People, places, and things associated with [category name]", which is unnecessary and redundant, given that's precisely what a category denotes. — ZimZalaBim talk 20:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Template is broken and unused since 2006. PeterSymonds (talk) 13:20, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bulgarian art history (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Broken, not used anywhere. — GregorB (talk) 19:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete per consenus; broken and unused. PeterSymonds (talk) 09:50, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Brixton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Broken, not used anywhere. — GregorB (talk) 19:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete as an unused an unneeded template (per consensus). PeterSymonds (talk) 08:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No one is using it and it is redundant with either {{Archives}} and {{Archive box}}. — KelleyCook (talk) 14:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete; articles on which this template was used are now deleted through AfD. PeterSymonds (talk) 08:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Brazilian number-one hits (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It's a red link festival Do U(knome)? yes...|or no 00:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.