Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 August 19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 19

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was 'delete --WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pope before 376 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer used. All the uses have been replaced with the succ boxes recommended at Wikipedia:WikiProject Succession Box Standardization. This will make it easier to add other bishoprics held before the papacy. Since all the popes now have a succ box this is no longer needed.. Bazj (talk) 20:01, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete - deprecated. --Doug.(talk contribs) 00:56, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NRFA questions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Should have been deleted as part of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:New adminship proposals. The template was for use in Wikipedia:New adminship proposals which was speedy deleted per the author's request. naerii 13:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Keep - update or merge based on results of discussions on this template's talk page or Template talk:Infobox Television#Vernacular. Refactoring has to do with changing comments on a talk page and is not a meaningful result for a template. --Doug.(talk contribs) 17:15, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox kdrama (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox kdrama/Header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox kdrama/Namebox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox kdrama/Footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I felt the template stupid because it is a consisting of header, simple form of {{Infobox Television}}, Korean name and its romanization and footer. Infobox Television can do anything better than kdrama for the TV shows. But if you need Korean name and romanizations displayed then {{Ko-hhrm}} will do something for you. And it was supposed to be "compatible with animanga templates." Now it isn't because animanga templates revamped themselves in May 2008 while Infobox kdrama remains same and can be solved if someone fix {{Infobox animanga/Drama}} to include non-Japanese adaptations. JSH-alive (talk)(cntrbtns)(mail me) 11:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox World Heritage Site (Protected area) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is not used anymore, so it should be deleted per criteria #3. Also note that I am the creator of this template.—Chris! ct 05:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.