Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 April 18
April 18
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Deprecated template that has been removed from all usages.. Kelly hi! 23:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete depreciated, not used. Atyndall93 | talk 03:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Comment hopefully TfD isn't the wrong venue this time (see history of template and past TfDs). --Thinboy00 @537, i.e. 11:52, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Reads like an article in template-space. Evidently created by mistake, by the same user who created James Wm. Chichetto with much of the same content. Russ (talk) 19:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete not suitable for Template: space. Atyndall93 | talk 03:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Strong delete per nom. If further consensus emerges, Snowball Delete. Furthermore, ask the author to blank it/add
{{db-author}}if it was a mistake. --Thinboy00 @538, i.e. 11:55, 23 April 2008 (UTC) - Comment it might be a copyvio; scroll down a bit when viewing it. Look at those quotes. --Thinboy00 @541, i.e. 11:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Military of Pakistan
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete. Will change to Pakistan Military Topics WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't think there is any need of this template because a better navigation template, "Pakistan Military Topics", for Military of Pakistan is there. . SMS Talk 19:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, the other template is more useful for navigation. GracenotesT § 20:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete just a slimmed down version of Template:Pakistan Military Topics. Atyndall93 | talk 03:29, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete the other template is far superior than this one.--Lenticel (talk) 10:25, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per all, and if it gets no keep !votes, Snowball it. --Thinboy00 @546, i.e. 12:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was speedy delete per CSD G7 - only author blanked the page. --Oxymoron83 12:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
No transclusions and pointless to boot. It seems to be article content in Template: space or a malformatted attempt at coding an Infobox. Either way it is not necessary.. RichardΩ612 14:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. There are probably no transclusions because it was created 3 days ago :) This template does appear to be an advertisement for a company, and the author has blanked it. As text content, it can just as well go in the article namespace. GracenotesT § 17:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete has been blanked by creator and is not suitable for Template: namespace. Atyndall93 | talk 03:30, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete for the blanking, so tagged. --Thinboy00 @543, i.e. 12:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
There is no use to this template. Only 2 article are using this template. This template was used in articles like 2008 in video gaming and many others and was replace by this template :- {{Years in Video Gaming}}. — SkyWalker (talk) 13:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete has been depreciated by Template:Years in Video Gaming. Atyndall93 | talk 03:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per User:Atyndall--Lenticel (talk) 10:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.