Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 September 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 30

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete as housekeeping. Elkman (Elkspeak) 15:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Info artista musical (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not a template per se, but an article written in template namespace and then used on the actual article page - I've moved the information to the article, so the information on the template is now redundant, and the template was only used on a single page Jeodesic 00:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Regression (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Only used on one page - redundant given the "clean up" tag - if a page requires clean up, whether or not it used to be considered "good" is irrelevant. danielfolsom 17:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ArkansasStateBasketballCoach (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Links to only two articles, with 13 redlinks, most of which are likely not notable enough for articles. szyslak 05:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, IronGargoyle 16:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Categorytree (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template is not used. No pages link here. The category it was put in no longer exists. It has little use; all it does is put a box around a category tree, which can easily be done manually. Also, as far as I can see, it does work. Putting {{Categorytree|Categories}} should produce this:

no subcategories

Instead it produces this:

Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

This could easily be fixed, but there is no reason I can see to keep this. — bse3 (talk contribs count logs) 02:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, IronGargoyle 16:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Proof (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Template:Proof is a huge self-reference and somewhat non-neutral when it says that the "proofs are considered interesting in themselves," almost as if it is justifying the articles existence (there have been objections to the notability of proofs in the past). Otheruses can handle clarification between the notable topic and the proof of the notable topic (ie, This article is about the proof of foo. For information about foo itself, see foo. Atropos 03:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hazardous Material Placards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 1-1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 1-2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 1-3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 1-4 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 1-5 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 1-6 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 2-1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 2-2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 2-3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 2-2 Alternate (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 2-3 Alternate (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 3 Combustible (Alt) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 3 Fuel Oil (Alt) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 3 Gasoline (Alt) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 4-1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 4-2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 4-3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 5-1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 5-2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 6-1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 6-2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 7 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 8 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:HAZMAT Cat 9 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unused. --Carnildo 17:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Malcolm (talk) 01:33, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.