Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 February 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 17

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Da Ali G Show episode (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Infobox Da Ali G Show season 1 episode list (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This infobox used 2 templates for it's display. It was duplicating {{Infobox Television episode}} and all 2 uses of the template have been replaced with the more general template and the showspecific template is no longer in use now. This is part of a larger effort to remove duplicity in episode infoboxes. -- TheDJ (talkcontribsWikiProject Television) 17:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Deleted by Metros232 under CSD G7 - author request. mattbr30 16:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{User:Patricknoddy/Userboxes/User Paint.NET}}
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current congressional delegation article (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template was used to create a series of articles that have since been AfD'd and is no longer used. --G1076 18:48, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

SEPTA templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 08:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SEPTA TU (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA Broad-Ridge Spur color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA Route 10 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA Route 34 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA Route 100 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA Route 102 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTArr all lines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA Subway-Surface Lines color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTArr insert (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA 30th street (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA Broad Street Line color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTArr R2 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTArr R6 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTArr R5 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA Route 101 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA Route 11 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA Route 36 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTArr R3 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA Market-Frankford Line color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA Route 13 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTA line (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Start SEPTA box (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTArr R1 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTArr R8 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTArr R7 color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SEPTArr line (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Start SEPTArr box (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

These templates have all been superseded by the s-rail and s-line templates for railroad succession. All article space transclusions removed. Mackensen (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spamonly (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This was created by a user who later turned out to be a sockpuppet of Willy on Wheels (WP:CSD#G5), so rather than speedying it, I have listed it for deletion here to see if it has any relevance to anyone. It could be deleted under CSD G5 (banned user contribution), but seeing as it is used on a few pages (Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Spamonly), I am unsure of what to do. --sunstar nettalk 12:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Usscl (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Ussc2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Ussc3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Ussc2R (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am nominating the four templates above for deletion because none of them seem to be in use and they are all duplicative of Template:Ussc, which is widely used. Each is used to cite to U.S. Supreme Court case with the following format: [Volume] U.S. [Page] ([Year]). I understand that different websites offer the text of the case decisions (e.g., findlaw versus lexis versus cornell), but I think consistency is better and deciding which site to use is already an ongoing debate on the talk page of the widely used Ussc template. And again, since the nominated templates aren't used at all, it's a good sign that there is no need for alternate sites providing the same text. Pygora123 06:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

AM Browser templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Probably should have been just speedied. WoohookittyWoohoo! 08:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest stable release/AM Browser (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Latest preview release/AM Browser (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

These should all be deleted as they refer to AM Browser (previously known as Crazy Browser), an article that has now been deleted, and thus serve no purpose in Wikipedia. If these are deleted Template:Latest preview release/Crazy Browser (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Template:Latest stable release/Crazy Browser (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) should also be deleted as broken redirects. Graham87 07:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Universities in the United Kingdom navigational templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. WoohookittyWoohoo! 08:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Universities in West Midlands (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Universities in East Midlands (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Universities in East of England (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Universities in London (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Universities in South West England (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Universities in South East England (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Universities in Yorkshire and the Humber (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Universities in North West England (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Universities in North East England (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Universities in Scotland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Scottish Universities (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Welsh Universities (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

All superseded by {{Universities in the United Kingdom}} and are not transcluded anywhere. mattbr30 00:32, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For navigation, I think that the UK-wide template is much more useful as it links together all of the universities in the UK. When looking at universities, I think that people want to look at other universities outside the region of the one they are currently looking at, for example those in the major cities or in the top ten (The Times top ten are in seven different regions), and regional navigation limits this. The 'list of universities in...' lists group the universities by region (the only transclusion before nomination for all of these apart from one), and can contain much more relevant information. mattbr30 12:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.