Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 December 8

< December 7	December 9 >

December 8

Template:Infobox Commercial Ship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was redirect to Template:Infobox Ship Example. --- RockMFR 17:46, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete template, replaced by the one described at {{Infobox Ship Example}}. — TomTheHand (talk) 21:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, to prevent confusion. American Patriot 1776 (talk) 23:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 23:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per all above. Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 00:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, then recreate as a redirect to {{Infobox Ship Example}} (or simply change it to a redirect now). Some users have been told and have used {{Infobox Commercial Ship}}; those seeking it again should be redirected to the newly-revised and more functional {{Infobox Ship Example}}. Kablammo (talk) 01:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_December_8#Template:Infobox_ship for a sensible proposal on {{Infobox Ship Example}}. Kablammo (talk) 13:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Copyright (C) 2007 Robert Sellmeyer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 04:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a template by which one user who has uploaded an image (template was only used on one image, Image:Rakeop2patch.jpg, and is now subst'ed there) can announce his copyright terms in that image. I don't think we even allow that, but if we do, there should be an existing generic template for it. BD2412 T 19:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Redundant. Maser ^(Talk!) 05:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears to be entirely redundant to {{GPL}}. Zetawoof_(ζ) 12:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Confusing, and does not use a standard image license tag. Pagra shtak 16:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above. This one is more baffling than anything else. JPG-GR (talk) 06:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:USN jack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deleted by author. Wizardman 04:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This template is a fork of {{USN flag}} which displays the jack instead of the ensign. Consensus is to display the ensign, and all uses of this template have been removed. — TomTheHand (talk) 06:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Maralia (talk) 07:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Martocticvs (talk) 21:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Activeuserprocess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted by creator request. — Gavia immer (talk) 17:09, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how this template is necessary at all. Do we really need such a notice to explain why someone isn't editing the main space? I don't see any benefit for the project. If a user wants to leave a notice on their talk page to this effect, sure, great, but a template? Not necessary as far as I can tell. — Metros (talk) 03:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nobody is linking to it. I don't think its useful enough to warrant its own template space. Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 05:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete Not used - and question usefulness. SkierRMH (talk) 05:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've tagged it with {{db-user}}. Sorry. --Solumeiras ^talk 11:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox ship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was redirect to Template:Infobox Ship Example. --- RockMFR 17:43, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated and now unused; replaced by {{Infobox Ship Example}}. — Maralia (talk) 02:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete to prevent future accidental use. TomTheHand (talk) 04:09, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to prevent confusion caused by two similarly named versions when one is superior. Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 05:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom & to prevent unintentional use. SkierRMH (talk) 05:53, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Martocticvs (talk) 21:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to {{Infobox Ship Example}}, to prevent confusion. American Patriot 1776 (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect. Per all above. It's unused anyway. Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 00:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect - this is the most obvious name for anyone looking for a ship infobox. Mauls (talk) 10:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and move {{Infobox Ship Example}} to {{Infobox ship}}. This makes the most sense. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Kablammo (talk) 13:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - {{Infobox Ship Example}} is exactly what it says - an example template showing how the code can be used. The actually template is in 3 parts to allow for duplication of sections, so moving this template to {{Infobox ship}} would not make sense, and would cause confusion. Martocticvs (talk) 14:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.