Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 December 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 6

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 02:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Historic Events of November 19 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nonsense personal template of a user that has zero encyclopedic usefulness. — -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 23:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 02:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Navyships (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unused and deprecated by {{Infobox Ship Example}}. — Maralia (talk) 17:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 03:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Foundation Press (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't think this template is useful, and it was only transcluded into 2 pages (Media and Press). I added a {{selfref}} tag with pretty much the same information at the top of these two pages (even if I doubt anyone from the Press will look up these words in order to find the foundation:press room. -- lucasbfr talk 09:26, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 03:01, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest preview release/Browzar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

No longer used; the related article, Browzar, was deleted: [1]. Korg (talk) 00:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 03:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Podgeandrodge (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Completely unnecessary template. All related articles already well linked from the main character and show articles. Half the links are either red linked or redirect back to Podge and Rodge article.. Collectonian (talk) 17:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC) Delete as redundant to Category:Podge and Rodge. There's no need for a template to navigate these articles. Terraxos 02:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 03:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.