Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 December 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 21

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. Picaroon (t) 04:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Airing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

this template is useless, it is only in use for 30 or 60 minutes in most cases anyway. — Ctjf83 talk 20:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Picaroon (t) 04:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Chalets (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Template has no, and is apparently not designed for, navigational value. It is used on two articles only, which link to each other, and only link to one further article, which is just a band of a similar genre who have toured with the band in question, or whatever. None of the other things on the template are linked, nor do they have articles, nor indeed should they. Given this, I don't see a whole lot of point in this template. — Jdcooper (talk) 18:21, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Shiftmain7 (talkcontribs) 17:33, December 24, 2007

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Number 2 singles templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Picaroon (t) 04:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UK Christmas No. 2s in the 1950s (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:UK Christmas No. 2s in the 1960s (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:UK Christmas No. 2s in the 1970s (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:UK Christmas No. 2s in the 1980s (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:UK Christmas No. 2s in the 1990s (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:UK Christmas No. 2s in the 2000s (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:UK Christmas No. 2s (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Excessive templating: records from one country which hit number 2 (not number 1) at Christmas. Imagine if we did this for every country! (See Wikipedia:Avoid template creep).

To make matters worse, these templates are being applied not just to articles on the records but the performers also. (I'm currently reverting those). kingboyk (talk) 17:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Picaroon (t) 04:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Schutzstaffel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unused and misleading: Death's Head is not the coat of arms of SS. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 16:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Picaroon (t) 04:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Mississippi Import (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Orphaned. No links to it.. -- ALLSTARecho 07:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.