Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 August 13

< August 12	August 14 >

August 13

Template:Energy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 03:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The pages linked in this template are now all redirects to Orders of magnitude (energy) Per previous discussion, this template was too complicated, and is now unneeded. –Sarregouset (Talk) 20:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-used and incompressible. Carlosguitar 05:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Yongsan Line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Black Falcon ^(Talk) 18:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny nav template with only one blue link, and only used in one article. No main article at Yongsan Line. — PC78 18:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nominator's points. –sebi 07:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Shobha De

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Black Falcon ^(Talk) 18:25, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most entries blank. Links should be within the main article. — Fl1942 16:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NFL star

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Black Falcon ^(Talk) 18:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unused barnstar template with redlinked image. There could never be an NFL barnstar anyway because the NFL is a trademark. (We have a college football one, though, and could have a generic American football one if there were interest.)— B 15:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, obsolete barnstar. –sebi 07:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Football player infobox3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Black Falcon ^(Talk) 18:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussed in WikiProject. The major different between Template:Infobox Football biography is Senior club appearances and goals counted for the domestic league only and Professional club appearances and goals counted for all official competitions. But it just no need and confusing to have two TP. Matthew_hk t c 13:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I think it would be better to maintain one standard here, if we ever decide to add cup apearances, such stats should be added separately from the league stats to avoid any possible confusion. -- Ban Ray 18:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:World Jewish population

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 02:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This template is massive, unnecessary, and redundant, given the existence of relevant, lists, categories, and Template:Jews and Judaism sidebar. — Biruitorul 00:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Either delete the template or heavily reorganize. This template is quite a mess, dealing with articles about the history of Jews, history of Judaism, modern-day state of Jews/Judaism, both history and modern-day state, etc. The only similarity between the articles is that each refers to Jews in context of a country, and has a redirect from "Jews in Country". A template for the History of Judaism in various countries would be useful, but this one is too unorganized, imho. Gracenotes^T § 16:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I am going to try to generate a version of the template which uses the article names, rather than redirects. This might be a good first step for organizing the template. Gracenotes^T § 16:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Aside from being unorganized, this template is actually a duplicate of others, available through the continent templates: template:Europe topic, template:Asia in topic, template:Africa in topic etc (all of these are actually present on the same pages as this one, making the latter seemingly pointless). Simply linking those templates through in-template "see alsos" would clarify all that needs to be clarified. I must also stress that the template this large is simply weird-looking. Dahn 17:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteper Biruitorul.--Brickoceanmonth 18:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Gracenotes' points. –sebi 07:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.