Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 October 6

< October 5	October 7 >

October 6

Template:Infobox_FinePix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:17, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan template _→AzaToth 23:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:PD-Australia-CC merge with Template:PD-AustraliaGov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:20, 14 October 2006 (UTC) They are template for the same type of images, the government one has a more clear name. --Peta 06:47, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Template:PD-Australia-CC. The government one has also a better, clearer explanation text. --Bisco 11:02, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User Wikipedia fake passport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion, as userfied. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category includes all users, violating one of the few rules for userboxes. Humor is not a valid objection to this nomination; that's beside the point. Please include a reason if you decide to object; I'm saying this only because of the numerous "Keep" messages I'm getting for another nomination that include no reasoning. Xiner 14:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Hard to see the point of this UBX. — G a ry Kirk // ^talk! 17:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Move to userspace. Per Wikipedia:Userbox migration. Harryboyles 06:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment And just who are you going to get to do that? -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 01:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to take it. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 12:25, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Every user fits the criterium. Zé da Silva 22:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. LOL. Maybe some of you guys should take a look at my nominations for deletion for User Earthling and User Earth. A few of us there are having tons of trouble in a similar situation.

Userfy - I'd be happy to take it. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 12:25, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy per WP:GUS. Ok, so that's not fit for Template namespace, but no one can justify not having it in userspace if it's not illegal. --The Raven's Apprentice ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 14:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I userfied it! --Wordbuilder 22:11, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I can, but I'm giving up arguing against useless userboxes. Xiner 01:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you. --Wordbuilder 03:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - De nada. It doesn't keep me from commenting, does it? :) Xiner 15:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - Depends on the terms of the surrender. {;o) --Wordbuilder 20:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        I think I've won the war and lost the battle. I can live with that. Xiner 15:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:user Eris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion, as userfied. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:23, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category is not helpful or noteworthy (encyclopaedic), violating one of the rules for templates. Humor is not a valid objection to this nomination; that's beside the point. Please include a reason if you decide to object; I'm saying this only because of the numerous "Keep" messages I'm getting for another nomination that include no reasoning. Xiner 15:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Harmless userbox. If the noteworthiness is a problem, then move it to userspace. Hut 8.5 08:38, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A userbox being harmless is not a reason for not deleting it. If it were, useless ones wouldn't be deleted. Moving this to userspace COULD work, but this should go regardless. Xiner 00:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that the userbox is harmless IS a reason for applying the GUS rather than just deleting it. If the userbox violated another rule (such as WP:NPA) then it could be run through this process. I can see no reason to delete it, and good reason to move it to userspace. Hut 8.5 13:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GUSing a template necessarily means it will be deleted from the Template namespace. Xiner 14:54, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but only after it has been GUSed. This one hasn't. If the conclusion of this TfD is to delete the template, then it can't be moved to userspace. Hut 8.5 15:18, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to avoid arguing over semantics, but a vote for Keep is a vote to keep it in the Template namespace forever. Xiner 22:20, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy and delete per the German Userbox Solution. --Core des at (talk) 03:43, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy - I'd be happy to take it. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 12:22, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied at User:EVula/Userboxes/Eris. I've fixed all instances of this template (which was made a bit more difficult due to a lot of people linking to the older version which was just a redirect). EVula 03:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:user K-PAXling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category is not helpful or noteworthy (encyclopaedic), violating one of the rules for templates. Humor is not a valid objection to this nomination; that's beside the point. Please include a reason if you decide to object; I'm saying this only because of the numerous "Keep" messages I'm getting for another nomination that include no reasoning. Xiner 15:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is a userbox for fans of the film. It's not just for humor. It's still in use by more than ten users. I would like to keep this until it is moved to userspace. I offer myself to adopt this userbox. --Bisco 20:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for volunteering, Bisco. Since no deletion will take place within seven days of nomination, that will hopefully provide enough time. Xiner 00:25, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since it does tie into a film, it's a bit different than the others Xiner has nominated for deletion. Bisco's solution is a good one. --Wordbuilder 05:28, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have the userbox now moved to userspace and bypassed all redirected transclusion links with the new location. Therefore I change my vote to Delete. --Bisco 13:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: - Motivated as above. --Nehwyn 06:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GUSing a template necessarily means it will be deleted from the Template namespace, as Bisco has pointed out. Xiner 14:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: See above. --Sir Link 15:30, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy and delete per Bisco. --Core des at (talk) 03:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy - I'd be happy to take it. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 12:22, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User Martian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion, as userfied. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category is not helpful or noteworthy (encyclopaedic), violating one of the rules for templates. Humor is not a valid objection to this nomination; that's beside the point. Please include a reason if you decide to object; I'm saying this only because of the numerous "Keep" messages I'm getting for another nomination that include no reasoning. Xiner 15:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy and delete, template has 88 uses. There's no harm in userfying this first per WP:GUS. --Core des at (talk) 03:47, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy - I'd be happy to take it. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 12:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied at User:EVula/Userboxes/Martian. All instances of this template have been updated. EVula 03:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User Alternate Earth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, as userfied. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:30, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category is not helpful or noteworthy (encyclopaedic), violating one of the rules for templates. Humor is not a valid objection to this nomination; that's beside the point. Please include a reason if you decide to object; I'm saying this only because of the numerous "Keep" messages I'm getting for another nomination that include no reasoning. Xiner 15:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it is fun, no sense in removing any potential for humor on user pages. → p00rleno (lvl 76) ←ROCKS 10:06, Friday December 20 2024 (UTC)

Many fun activities are not encyclopedic. Many fun userboxes exist without violating the few rules that govern them. Xiner 16:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This issue could be resolved by moving the userbox to userspace, as in WP:GUS. Userspace has less restrictions on what can be done with it (see this MfD). Hut 8.5 17:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As creator of this userbox, I can't conscience voting, but I really don't see why we would delete this one, but keep Earth and Earthling, it's the same idea.Bo-Lingua 17:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I've nominated those two for deletion already. Xiner 17:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely move to userspace (its creator's?), but do keep. --Nehwyn 06:12, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated this userbox for deletion from Template namespace. Nothing more, nothing less. Xiner 00:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy and delete per WP:GUS. --Core des at (talk) 03:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy - I'd be happy to take it. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 12:20, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied at User:EVula/Userboxes/Alternate Universe. All instances of its use have been fixed. EVula 04:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Country IOC alias HKG before 1997

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template was likely intended to be used with {{FlagIOC}} and similar templates, but does not work as intended. Now orphaned and should be deleted for cleanup reasons. Andrwsc 19:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Country IOC alias ATA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template was likely intended to be used with {{FlagIOC}} and similar templates, but does not work as intended. Now orphaned and should be deleted for cleanup reasons. Andrwsc 19:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Country flag IOC alias ATA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template was likely intended to be used with {{FlagIOC}} and similar templates, but does not work as intended. Now orphaned and should be deleted for cleanup reasons. Andrwsc 19:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Country IOC alias AU

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:35, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template was likely intended to be used with {{FlagIOC}} and similar templates, but does not work as intended. Now orphaned and should be deleted for cleanup reasons. Andrwsc 19:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Country flag IOC alias AU

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template was likely intended to be used with {{FlagIOC}} and similar templates, but does not work as intended. Now orphaned and should be deleted for cleanup reasons. Andrwsc 19:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Country IOC alias BiH

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template was likely intended to be used with {{FlagIOC}} and similar templates, but duplicates intent of the existing {{Country IOC alias BIH}}. Now orphaned and should be deleted for cleanup reasons. Andrwsc 19:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Country flag IOC alias BiH

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template was likely intended to be used with {{FlagIOC}} and similar templates, but duplicates intent of the existing {{Country flag IOC alias BIH}}. Now orphaned and should be deleted for cleanup reasons. Andrwsc 19:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Country IOC alias KIT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template was likely intended to be used with {{FlagIOC}} and similar templates, but duplicates intent of the existing {{Country IOC alias ITA}}. Now orphaned and should be deleted for cleanup reasons. Andrwsc 19:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Country flag IOC alias KIT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template was likely intended to be used with {{FlagIOC}} and similar templates, but duplicates intent of the existing {{Country flag IOC alias ITA}}. Now orphaned and should be deleted for cleanup reasons. Andrwsc 19:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Country IOC alias SAF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template was likely intended to be used with {{FlagIOC}} and similar templates, but duplicates intent of the existing {{Country IOC alias RSA}}. Now orphaned and should be deleted for cleanup reasons. Andrwsc 19:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Country flag IOC alias SAF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template was likely intended to be used with {{FlagIOC}} and similar templates, but duplicates intent of the existing {{Country flag IOC alias RSA}}. Now orphaned and should be deleted for cleanup reasons. Andrwsc 19:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User Final Fantasy series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion, as userfied. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:41, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The userbox this template created has been moved to userspace per Wikipedia:Userbox migration. All transclusion links have been bypassed with the new location. Bisco 19:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed, delete per nom Charon X/talk 23:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User Final Fantasy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, as userfied. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:42, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is only a redirect to a userbox template. The corresponding userbox has been migrated to userspace per Wikipedia:Userbox migration. All transclusion links of the redirect have been changed to the new location. Bisco 20:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed, delete per nom Charon X/talk 23:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox Billionaire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:43, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Created in March 2006. Uses deprecated Wikipedia:hiddenStructure. Ligulem 22:54, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No one should be allowed to flaunt their wealth like that. Xiner 01:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per Ligulem. —Ruud 10:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.