Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 October 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 4

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 02:26, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pokemon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unused, seems to be the result of a user trying to make edits to the article Ash Ketchum. Graham87 08:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Transcluding itself is a giveaway; it looks like a failed attempt to add an infobox to an article by instead writing a new template with prefilled parameters that transcludes itself. (This happens a lot more often than I expected...) --ais523 10:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete by author request. >Radiant<

Template:Party shading/Pro-Jacksonian2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unused; created as a temporary solution to duplicated color shading. G1076 17:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 02:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Magazine2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Fork of template:Infobox Magazine. Unused. Would have to be converted to not using Wikipedia:hiddenStructure if it must be kept. Was only used in Copeia. Ligulem 00:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.