Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 October 16

< October 15	October 17 >

October 16

Template:Seven share

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 05:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. jd || talk || 23:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with no description or discussion, this template is basically nonsense. Plus it is orphaned.--Andrew c 20:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Montreal infobox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 05:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This template was standardized to the Template:Infobox City a while ago without objection. It is no longer used in the article. MJCdetroit 16:16, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete redundent. The purpose of templates is to have one template for many articles, not the other way around. We do not need a template for every city, besides this template is unused.--Andrew c 20:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant. --Ter e nce Ong _{(T | C)} 10:03, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox U.S. state English & Metric units

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 05:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. This was basically a sandbox. It should have been deleted in March 2006. It is unused. MJCdetroit 16:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The title makes no sense compared to the content, unused.--Andrew c 20:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Northern Ireland topics [previous version]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 05:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Ireland topics [previous version]

Nav box is a duplicate of the one moved to Template:Northern Ireland topics. It has been deprecated and orphaned. Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Redundancy.--Andrew c 20:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --padraig3uk 01:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Spoiler redirect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 05:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete because template is no longer used. It used to be for redirects which caused spoilers (as in the redirect itself resulted in spoilers). However, it seemed like discussions at WP:SPOILER have resulted in a decision to stop using soft redirects for spoilers caused by redirecting. Pages that used to have this template have all been converted into ordinary redirects. No pages currently link to this template. No pages also has this template substituted (a google search for the text that shows up from using this template shows the text is only on one wikpedia page - that is, the template page itself. `/aksha 09:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Spoiler redirects should also be deleted. The category was originally used for pages marked with the spoiler redirect. The category is empty, and has no pages linking to it. --`/aksha 09:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Categories purely populated by templates can be speedied if the template is TfDd. --ais523 12:17, 16 October 2006 (U T C)
Delete per consensus elsewhere. --ais523 12:17, 16 October 2006 (U T C)
Keep, the discussion on if we should have spoiler redirects hasn't ended yet [1] & so far more people agree we should have spoiler redirects (in fact as of this writing, no one is on the "hard redirect" side). SNS 17:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's no longer used, and using it just doesn't make sense. If A redirects to B, then A by itself probably isn't too important. In cases where the two things are related (such as Anakin and Darth Vader) but both are notable by themselves, then there is no redirect at all. In any case, spoiler redirects are a bad idea. --- RockMFR 17:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Soft redirects suck, and there is no reason to use them for something like a spoiler warning that has no place in an encyclopedia anyway. Kusma (討論) 06:04, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, soft redirs were not such a good idea for this. >Radiant< 09:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no need for such redirects. --Ter e nce Ong _{(T | C)} 10:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poor use of softredirects. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:55, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Trans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 05:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template is a less in-depth version of {{Transformers}}. It was only used on a handful of articles, which I updated to the bigger template. EVula 01:31, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Newer, larger template is inclusive of the info in this orphaned one. --Satori Son 13:14, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above.--Andrew c 20:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom & above [x2] :: the template is a copy of the larger {{Transformers}} and is a waste of valuble Wikimedia server space. --Anthony cfc^{(talk • c • ama)} Friday, 20/Oct/2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox Region GR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 05:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Would need removal of defunct Wikipedia:hiddenStructure if no consensus for deletion. Ligulem 11:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Andrew c 20:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox Region GRE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Упражнение В!) 05:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Would need removal of defunct Wikipedia:hiddenStructure if no consensus for deletion. Ligulem 11:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Andrew c 20:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.