Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 October 1

< September 30	October 2 >

October 1

Template:Post 2002 Oregon Highway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 02:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This template was used to create a hatnote with text that should have actually been in the main article text. I have already substituted it on all the articles it was used on (which was only about five). NORTH ^talk 20:52, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:infobox film awards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 02:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan template. _→AzaToth 16:38, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox female bio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 02:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ophaned template, unly used in one instance. _→AzaToth 14:43, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User bladerunner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. —Cuivi é nen 21:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:GUS should userboxes be transferred to user-namespace. This userbox template has no links anymore and is only a redirect. I think it can therefore be deleted. --Bisco 12:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Dune:Spice

This userbox template can be deleted per WP:GUS. The userbox has been moved to user-namespace. The template has no transclusion links anymore. --Bisco 12:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Madonna confessed fan

This userbox template could be deleted per WP:GUS. The userbox has been moved to user-namespace. The template has no transclusion links anymore. --Bisco 12:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox Comedian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 02:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Empty infobox template. Apparently a test that fell through. Shannernanner 15:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Finalfantasy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 02:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The template is redundant to this better-designed template which is already located in user-namespace (see WP:GUS) and it's only rarely used. Note: the TfD template has still a transclusion link. --Bisco 16:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Insert transclusion text if it is still in use. Sir Crazyswordsman 03:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's on a userpage. "What links here" gives: User:Cloudy (transclusion). --Bisco 05:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not any more, I've changed it to the newer one. Cloudy 13:44, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Hiddenref

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 02:13, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uses the CSS hack Wikipedia:hiddenStructure, which should no longer be used. Currently, there are only 8 transclusions. We should stop further spreading of this accessibility problem over Wikipedia. See also discussions at Template talk:Hiddenref and MediaWiki_talk:Common.css#hiddenStructure_again. Ligulem 18:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I'm not even going to waste my time explaining on a 3rd page, pure bad faith nom. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 18:54, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this a bad faith nom? I truly believe it should be deleted. We have had some discussion in advance, but how does that preclude a TfD nomination? --Ligulem 19:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think this is a bad-fath nomination; there was a debate about {{hiddenref}}'s utility on its talk page, which received a moderately low level of input; two users thought it ought to be deleted, and one of them took the matter to TfD to get more community input. --ais523 08:41, 2 October 2006 (U T C)

Delete - No code should discriminate against users. _→AzaToth 18:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—This is part of a complex CSS hack which reduces accessibility to solve some obscure problem (literally obscure: the template's purpose isn't explained). The claim of "bad faith" is spurious. —Michael Z. 2006-10-01 19:01 Z
Delete per Ligulem. —Ruud 20:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC
Delete per nom, Michael Z, and Wikipedia:hiddenStructure. -- NORTH ^talk 20:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Thanks to Michael Z for orphaning this; it seems clear that regardless of the accessibility problem (which is reason enough to delete this), there are better ways of achieving what this is meant to achieve. --ais523 08:41, 2 October 2006 (U T C)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.