Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 March 30

< March 29	March 31 >

March 30, 2006

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no apparent consensus, keep Circeus 17:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:N9jig-il-shield

Template:N9jig-il-shield (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Delete. We don't need a fair-use template for drawings of highway markers from a specific site, and I don't think the images in question are fair-use: either they are ineligible for copyright, or a Wikipedian can make free-license replacements. Carnildo 21:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: User:SPUI has created a lot of our highway marker images. I'll ask what is up with these. Jkelly 04:15, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think they'd be ineligible for copyright. I'd make SVG replacements, but I don't have the specs. I need the specs for sign M1-I100 from the IDOT version of Standard Highway Signs. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 04:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...which I either need to find or contact IDOT about. A simple google search is all I've really had time to do lately, but it might be on their website. In the meantime, since this is all we've got, keep because nothing better exists. —Rob (talk) 12:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: NO DeletionHey, Rich Carlson (N9JIG) is a police officer in a suburban Chicago village. He does have contacts with IDOT. He has been researching the Illinois highway numbering system for several years, and just recently spoke to the IDOT Traffic Engineers Conference in Champaign regarding his historical work. I helped him with his web page a coupel years ago - since I use to live in west central Illinois. Have issues or questions, ask Rich!

--Greg Beat 04:09, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — feeling obligated to cite the email where I requested permission:

At 3:18 PM -0600 12/27/04, LpAngelRob wrote:

Rich,

As I've found that your site has been by far the most comprehensive site on Illinois Highways anywhere... I was wondering if it would be okay with you to use (with your permission) the Illinois Route sign graphics on your website. I would link back to your site, of course. The end result would be a part of the Wikipedia, where I gradually import information regarding current Illinois State Routes (see http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_Illinois_state_highways). All of the information on the site has come from mostly my own memory and through verification in Mapquest.

Would I have your permission to use the sign graphics to help complement the existing articles? Feel free to add your own, as well.

Thanks,

-Robert

Response from Rich dated 12/27/04 3:18 PM CST

Sure, and thanks for asking first!

Feel free to use the sign images for the Wikpedia site. Please download the images to your server, as to limit the bandwidth strain on my server.

Enjoy!

—Rob (talk) 15:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep at least until the JPEG shield images are superseded. There are articles and other images with source tags like this. There are, in theory, currently over 150 images that need this same source message. I agree that the text could (and should) be cleaned up to specify whether they are fair use images or are donated or are irrevocably under a Wikipedia-compatable license. Indeed, the need to clean this up is a good example of why the template is useful: otherwise, we'd have to go through 150 images and edit the information. This template could probably go away once the SVG images are ready, but not right now. --Closeapple 05:56, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Circeus 17:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Various aircraft navigational templates

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Circeus 17:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Netherlands infobox

Delete Redundant. Chairman S. ^Talk 21:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. —Nightst a llion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 12:27, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --Ter e nc e Ong 16:18, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As all other templates like this. Afonso Silva 19:49, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the template, move it out of the template namespace, and redirect to Netherlands. — Insta ntnood 21:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Circeus 17:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nauru infobox

Delete. —Nightst a llion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 12:27, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Afonso Silva 19:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the template, move it out of the template namespace, and redirect to Nauru. — Insta ntnood 21:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete: it's not used anyway Circeus 17:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ESRB RP

Template:ESRB RP (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
This template uses a ESRB rating image under fair use for decoration. This is against Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Fair use#Policy and WikiProject CVG guidelines. Pagra shtak 06:07, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 14:30, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Can't we just remove the picture? If the article is not useful, that's another discussion. Afonso Silva 19:48, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all Circeus 17:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Milair td

Has been replaced by Template:Airtd; now fully depopulated. Ingoolemo ^talk 02:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Civair nt, Template:Civair nd, and Template:Civair td also need to be deleted. All have been depopulated. (Replaced by Template:Airnt, Template:Airnd, and Template:Airtd, respectively).

And likewise Template:Experimental civil aircraft by decade2 (replaced by Template:Airtd)

And Template:Civair ntd (replaced by Template:Airntd)

Delete per nom --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 14:33, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.