Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 June 21

< June 20	June 22 >

June 21, 2006

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was replace and redirect -- Drini 20:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nordic Countries

Delete redundant. —Mi r a 00:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to Template:Nordic Council. The name has a purpose, even though the article/template itself may not. User:Raccoon Fox Talk 03:28, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to Template:Nordic Council. - Nick C 15:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Template:Nordic Council. - 20:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete and redirect to Template:Nordic Council, as that template is better and the two templates are about the same thing. - Tamino 15:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Template:Nordic Council. The two concepts are not completely the same (since Scandinavians normally only include Norway, Sweden, and Denmark as the "Nordic counties", while others use a wider definition). But as a politicial concept, the scope is wider and pretty easy to define, so the Nordic Council template is better. Valentinian ^(talk) 09:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 20:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Back to the Future character 2

Template:Back to the Future character 2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I have merged the functionalities of this template (allow to disply a different set of reference years) into template:Back to the Future character and replaced it's use. It is unnecessary now. Circeus 19:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 20:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete by Stifle--SomeStranger^(t) 15:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as per author's request. -- Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 09:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Deletebecause:Needs to be WDGG-FM

Template:Deletebecause:Needs to be WDGG-FM (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Doesn't make any sense, and simply using the db template would likely be shorter if the message on the template is ever needed. Also, the reason given doesn't seem to be any of the criteria for speedy deletion, which would be expected on a speedy template. ais523 14:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete single instance substed -- Drini 20:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nationalanthemsoftheworld

Template too huge to be used in any page. CG 13:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to be designed for use on the articles about the national anthems themselves, not the countries, I can't imagine what other templates would need to go on those pages. Also, a hide/show function should be added. —Mi r a 15:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- - Comment: Yes, the box is intended for use only on pages dealing with national anthems. They're usually very short pages, so though the template is large it won't extend the articles to the breaking point. Badagnani 21:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:I added a hide-show option to the box. Does anyone know if the links need to be changed? Are they supposed to be pointing to the pages that contain the national anthems as opposed to the country pages themselves?--SomeStranger^(t) 16:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- See the template's talk page. I'm pretty sure they are supposed to be changed. —Mi r a 20:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, it's a huge job to insert those links so I was hoping that one or more other national anthem fans could help insert them one by one. I've done a couple of dozen so far. Badagnani 21:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to something less wordy. --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 18:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment could it be split along the lines of the "continent in topic" templates? Circeus 22:52, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- - That's an interesting idea, and very practical. Yes, of course this could be done fairly easily -- but keeping the National anthems of the world (with the whole world) template in just two articles: National anthem and List of national anthems. Badagnani 00:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nationalanthemsofafrica and Template:Nationalanthemsofeurope created. More to follow. Badagnani 02:32, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Many of the links don't actually go to the anthems; could you unlink those or otherwise make it more clear that they aren't pointing to the proper place? Night Gyr 04:02, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am working very hard at this. Badagnani 05:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Also, I think a single-column list for the right side of anthem articles would be a much easier format. The current version is a big mass that makes it hard to scan and find a specific item. Night Gyr 04:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an example of this? I'd like to see what such a list would look like. Badagnani 05:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking like we have for episodes of the simpsons. See how Dancin' Homer has a single column list down the right hand side of every episode for the season? It's easier to pick out items from a list that keeps them aligned, because the eye can just scan vertically to the desired first letter, rather than trying to look through a jumble. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 07:04, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at Dancing Homer but the (numbered) list was only about 25 items long. I think there must be over 200 countries and other states in the full anthems list. With smaller lists like the anthems of Central America template I've made it's not so hard because there are only 7 nations. But with Africa, the World, and other continents with many countries it does get a bit long. Badagnani 17:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Rename, and make sure the links go to the anthems and not the countries. Nationalparks 15:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am working very hard at this. Badagnani 05:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. - Nick C 15:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but rename to a less heavy name. A good idea, but it should be collapsed as default, so it doesn't dominate pages too much. Valentinian ^(talk) 12:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, rename to something like {{nationalanthems}} and collapse by default per Valentinian. --ais523 12:34, 28 June 2006 (U T C)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 20:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox PM

Template:Infobox PM (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
On 7 June 2006 Infobox:Prime Minister was put up for deletion. In the debate it was suggested that Infobox_Prime Minister and Infobox_PM should be deleted and redirected to Template:Infobox President in order to have a standard template for office holders on Wikipedia. Infobox_Prime Minister was deleted and I redirected it to Template:Infobox President, this now serves the purpose of Template:Infobox_PM, so it is no longer needed. Hera1187 12:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. - Nick C 15:47, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete -- Drini 20:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WOW-real

Template:WOW-real (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
And the point is, what exactly? Redundant to Template:WoW, inappropriate tone "is, of course..." Used on one userpage, and that person wasn't the original Willy on Wheels anyway. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 07:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replace with {{WoW}} and Delete per nom.--SomeStranger^(t) 11:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Subst it, then delete--The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 21:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This isn't the original user. If you read Special:Contributions/Willy_on_Wheels (of which there are only three contribs) none of them are vandalism or trolling, and they mention "No, [I'm] not the Willy on Wheels."--The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 21:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Subst then delete people complained when it was {{WoW}} see User talk:Willy on Wheels. Eluchil404 04:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wheelate, erm, delete because unneeded. TZM^T (de:^T) 12:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP -- Drini 20:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:James Bond characters

Comment: I agree it's huge, and often larger than the articles themselves, but it is useful, possibly more useful than the lists. Certainly better looking. Maybe it needs to be split into smaller templates? Andymarczak 10:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But we already have them in categories. All it does is duplicate that. What possible purpose does this have? There is no order here or better organization. According to Wikipedia:Template namespace: "Templates should also not be used to create lists of links to other articles when a category or a See also list can perform the same function." — clearly this template violates that. K1Bond007 19:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They are still useful as navigation templates. Even though you cited the rules, it appears that such templates are supported by teh community. For instance, another user attempted to nominate Template:Mario series and Template:Zelda series for deletion (see archive entry), also with the same justification, and was unilaterally shot down. Hbdragon88 20:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The reason that these templates remain is because the average user does not use the categories. Navigation templates are far more accessable as long as they are relavent and not too large.--SomeStranger^(t) 21:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I gave it "hide" and "show" options for those who think it is too big. Those options are persistant, so closing it once keeps it closed for all pages in the future. I think it is actually pretty useful as far as templates go.--SomeStranger^(t) 11:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. —dima ^/sb.tk/ 22:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Well done. But I'm not sure I like the look of it--the italics look strange. Badagnani 22:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which italics? The ones in the template itself for the individual pages? Or the ones for the heading (James Bond is in italics)?--SomeStranger^(t) 23:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The italics in the box text, the names of the characters. Type face is small, and italics makes it even harder to read. Badagnani 00:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer to break up into several templates, one each for the categories of bond girls, villains, allies, etc. Then have the main list linked to from all. That way you have an easier to read format close at hand and a quick reference for the closely related ones.Night Gyr 04:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I would say this is ideal if we are to have a template at all. K1Bond007 20:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Huge, I don't care if you can hide it, it's just plain useless. Content is argueable too. Get it away from me! ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 07:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment No opinion on this, but I did what I could to make this more compact and readable. ~ trialsanderrors 04:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think that this template gives a reader a easy way to get to any character that they want. I like it how it became the two coloumns now rather than the old way. User:Broncopaul
Keep - Looks good --SGCommand (talk • contribs) 18:01, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Very useful Cyclone49 03:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete -- Drini 19:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Game Mixtapes

Subst and Delete per nom.--SomeStranger^(t) 11:27, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and Delete It has fair use images in it too. —Mi r a 15:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
subst and delete for all of the above reasons. --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 20:22, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without substing. Fair-use images are not allowed in galleries. User:Angr 10:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete -- Drini 19:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MilitaryOperation

Template:MilitaryOperation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
This template is obsolete and as been officially replaced by {{Infobox Military Conflict}} which is also been officially adopted my the WikiProject Military history group. James Bond 00:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Kirill Lokshin 01:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as obsolete and no longer used. -- Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 09:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom -larsinio (poke)^(prod) 20:22, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.