Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 July 5

< July 4	July 6 >

July 5, 2006

Template:Wtf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Pagra shtak 02:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC) Template:Wtf (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)[reply]
Cute name, but unprofessional and unnecessary. The text is written in a half-joking tone, and it doesn't accomplish anything that {{attention}} doesn't already cover. ~ Booya ^Bazooka 23:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, just another joke template. - Bobet 16:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this should never be used in articles. Wikipedia is much, much better than that. --Cyde↔Weys 20:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Certainly an understandable sentiment, but there are other cleanup tags, including one that calls for a complete rewrite. Sophy's Duckling 22:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Humurous but not useful for Wikipedia. -ScotchMB 23:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The usefulness of this template is of such low quality as to make Wikipedians embarrassed. --james _{// bornhj (talk)} 04:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
BJAODN. I think this is good enough for that. In fact, I'll do it myself soon... Delete for obvious reasons. Grand master ka 07:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete T1 BigDT 16:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and donate to Uncyclopedia -→Buchanan-Hermit ™/?! 21:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Sumahoy 12:29, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per T1. BJAODN or Unencylcopedia seems fine to me too. -- Northenglish (talk) -- 20:46, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Template should never be used, but stick this sucker in BJAODN for getting a quick chuckle out of. Kevin_b_er 03:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Secdis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

An apparently undiscussed attempt to change the disambiguation page convention by segregating dab pages with (disambiguation) in the title. It is obsolete... if pages follow MoS:DAB correctly, they will link to the parent article on the first line, making it clear that it is the standard usage. It is also misleading to suggest that the only way to get to a secondary disambiguation page is from the main article. Delete this along with Category:Secondary disambiguation pages, which have all been created and (very partially) populated by User:Nintendude BigBlueFish 18:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. I don't see how this is useful. --Usgnus 18:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both as it describes only one path that can be taken to get to the disambig page. --Interiot 01:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per nom. Sophy's Duckling 22:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:DLSU

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Superseded by Template:DLSP. --Howard t he Du c k 15:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Though it would have been easier to just edit Template:DLSU then move it to its new name. Coffee 06:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there is a different, more in-depth template covering basically the same subjects. Sophy's Duckling 22:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.