Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 July 31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 31

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily deleted per CSD G4 by Stifle. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 01:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Provides a redundant link on Interstate H-1 and Interstate H-201. --SPUI (T - C) 19:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(The people rejoice!) 03:56, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bookinfo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

No pages use this template. Should be using "Template:Cite_book" instead. -- SatyrTN 01:11, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy close - moved to RfD. --ais523 09:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Template:Legaldisclaimer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Template text rewritten not to be a disclaimer and moved to Template:Legally frivolous, per comments on previous TfD (July 18). This redirect now serves no need and is misleading. Robert A.West (Talk) 12:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(The people rejoice!) 03:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox The Simpsons season 15 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Superseded by {{Infobox Simpsons episode}}, this is unfinished and apparently unused.Gareth Aus 08:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(The people rejoice!) 03:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GaWC Inventory of World Cities (1999 Edition) - some (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Aside from the awful name, this should be a list and perhaps a mention in the article of each. I see no utility of being ble to browse by such a classificiation. olderwiser 12:02, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was seriously...keep. ;) - Mailer Diablo 16:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Seriously (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A BJAODN-quality template, made entirely redundant by {{bv}} and {{bv-n}}. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 08:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(The people rejoice!) 04:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Genealogy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template is far more limited to be used a genealogy template. It was previously used in two different articles which now uses Familytree template. This template is therefore obsolete and should be removed. Oblivious 05:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.