Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 July 13

< July 12	July 14 >

July 13, 2006

Template:Image information

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. RyanG e rbil10(The people rejoice!) 03:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Created by User:Hurricane Devon and used only on his image uploads (as far as I can tell). Redundant to {{Information}}. Suggest replacing all instances of this with the latter. howch e ng {chat} 20:14, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replace and delete per nom. Chaos syndrome 20:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: this temp. was created to help organize uploaded images. It dosn't deserve to be deleted. — 71.98.198.74 12:24, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: 71.98.198.74 is the same as the blocked User:Hurricane Devon. Chaos syndrome 17:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right, but we already have {{Information}}. Is there any reason why we should be using yours instead of the other? howch e ng {chat} 23:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This template offers more information than {{information}}. Nobody using it may just be a symptom of it not being included in template directories or users using subst: more than its lack of value. Neil916 21:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and replace with standard template. --Cyde↔Weys 02:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to be better than the other template; now I'm aware of it, maybe I'll use it.--Runcorn 19:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Lenaing towards keep This template is almost exactly the same as the one on Commons, and provides more info than {{information}}. Hbdragon88 03:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it looks better than information - just add it to the list of templates. 70.51.10.176 03:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Mario/Wario/Yoshi/Donkey Kong series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep -- Drini 01:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This series is originate from each other, so it is much better to comninate this four. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Loves Nintendo! (talk • contribs) 14:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC) (tagged --ais523 15:03, 13 July 2006 (U T C))

Keep all If they were merged, I suspect the resulting template would be TfD'd and split again. The templates are big enough as they are. --ais523 15:05, 13 July 2006 (U T C)
I'm not really sure what "comninate" means, but if the above poster is referring to a merge, the resulting seriesbox will be far too large that it may hinder readability. Keep all if the nominator is proposing a merge. ╫ ２５ ^{◀RingADing▶} 18:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC) ╫[reply]
Keep all as per above. --HeroicJay 19:27, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all obviously, and delete {{Mario/Yoshi/Wario/Donkey Kong series}} instead. Pagra shtak 04:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all-RomeW 06:46, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all for all reasons above. → ケイト∞ (contact) 12:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all obviously, and delete {{Mario/Yoshi/Wario/Donkey Kong series}} instead, per Pagra shtak - Liontamer 13:15, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all These templates really help me out a lot!! - SaturnYoshi 15:08, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all, split Mario A Wario game isn't a Donkey Kong game and a Yoshi game isn't a Wario game. Yoshi could be merged with Mario, but it isn't necessary. The Mario Game List needs to be split though. There are just too many games.
Keep all Combining these simply wouldn't make sense. They're not that related and the templates are already very big. Lumpio- 02:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All for reasons already stated TJ Spyke 02:21, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all - they're useful. -- Schnee (cheeks clone) 21:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all per comments. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 07:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Football squad2 end

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 01:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template was created by me as part of a series of templates to standardise football squad templates, but a change in structure (specilically the creation of Template:football squad2 lastplayer) means it's now redundant. The only uses of the template (on a talk page) have been subst'd out. Daduzi ^talk 02:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom AdamBiswanger1 14:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Country_infobox_data_(multiple TfDs)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete-- Drini 01:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some no longer needed data holders missed by Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_June_29#Template:Country_infobox_data_(multiple_TfDs). TimBentley (talk) 01:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. --MJCdetroit 13:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.