Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 February 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 13 February 15 >

February 14, 2006

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was moot - speedy deleted by Physchim62 (02:53, 19 February 2006 Physchim62 deleted "Template:User Unionist" (T1)) - Mailer Diablo 15:49, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Unionist

[edit]

Template:User_Unionist (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
POV userboxes on user pages will no doubt cause disruption on wikipedia if a page is altered by someone with this box or any other politically motivated user box it attracts the wrong people and possible revert wars. Alibabs 00:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 01:28, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MLB HoF

[edit]

Template:MLB HoF (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template was using a fair use image. I deleted the image and just turned it into a text line, but now that is creating a lot of awkwardness in the linked pages. But the template is unncessary because, from what I can tell, the linked articles already mention and/or categorize the players as Hall of Fame members. delete. --Fang Aili 23:30, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, and find a non-infringing image -- perhaps an image of the Museum or of one of the plaques. I think this template is an important one to keep, since it quickly and prominently identifies a member of the Hall of Fame. Jpers36 00:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The image that was used was the Hall of Fame logo; I suspect the plaques are all copyrighted, so using an image from one of them would probably be less acceptable than the old logo. MisfitToys 00:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; I don't see the point of this; all the hall of fame members are already categorized, and as their baseball career is almost always their only or at least their primary claim to fame, this template is unnecessary. --Spangineer (háblame) 05:23, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep; see Jpers36, above. Having a prominent identification of HoF players is preferable to simply linking the Baseball Hall of Fame article in a sentence. --Ebayjay 09:29, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This template serves no purpose not already served by categories. Encyclopedias are not made up of little tags that say "This x is a y". --FOo 10:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Useful template to quickly identify HoF members. No Guru 06:48, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, for the reasons cited by Ebayjay, assuming a suitable image can be found. -Colin Kimbrell 16:12, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, for the reasons cited above. It is an easy way to identify Hall of Fame Members, as well as a solid launching pad for the HoF itself. Players elected to the Hall become part of something larger - this template helps identify that, in what I believe is the appropriate spirit. If permission is not granted to use the logo, surely another image cen be found, either a picture of the Hall, a new image of a baseball, or something else for which permissions may be obtained. --Chancemichaels 17:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)Chancemichaels[reply]
  • Keep, for most of the reasons cited. The HOF logo is not being used here commercially; the HOF wouldn't have a basis for objection if it objected. Besides, I've busted my hump on the Joe DiMaggio page. User:no ID, 21 February 2006
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Breed

[edit]

Template:Breed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unused template, as far as I can see. TexasAndroid 16:14, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete unused - • | Đܧ§§Ť | • T | C 16:51, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted as patent nonsense. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 16:19, Feb. 14, 2006

Template:Authjwpuppet

[edit]

Template:Authjwpuppet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPLIT, not actually a seeming request for deletion. -Splashtalk 01:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Semi-vegetarian

[edit]

Template:Semi-vegetarian (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template has been split into {{User_pesco/pollo_vegetarian}}, {{User_pescetarian}}, {{User_pollotarian}} Fasten 12:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Physchim62 (02:54, 19 February 2006 Physchim62 deleted "Template:User Irish Republican" (T1)) - Mailer Diablo 15:48, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User_Irish_Republican

[edit]

Template:User_Irish_Republican (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

*Keep Theres nothing wrong with it! I wish people would stop flooding TfD with unneeded nominations - • | Đܧ§§Ť | • T | C 16:45, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - TheKeith 18:42, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where did the userbox go? WHo deleted after it was made clear the majority wanted to keep it? ALso, the Unionist box, the Basque Country box, Catalonia, Scotland, wtf? --Tiocfaidh Ár Lá! 13:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -nMailer Diablo 02:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox

[edit]

Template:Campaignbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
No longer used, not necessary now that {{Battlebox}} has been replaced by {{Infobox Military Conflict}}. —Kirill Lokshin 03:19, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:38, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Battlebox

[edit]

Template:Battlebox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
No longer used on any articles, obsoleted by {{Infobox Military Conflict}}. —Kirill Lokshin 03:19, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete - Mailer Diablo 02:44, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Siege of Pleven

[edit]

Template:Campaignbox Siege of Pleven (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
No longer used, obsoleted by {{Campaignbox Russo-Turkish War, 1877-1878}}. —Kirill Lokshin 03:13, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete - Mailer Diablo 02:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Battles for Shipka Pass

[edit]

Template:Campaignbox Battles for Shipka Pass (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
No longer used, obsoleted by {{Campaignbox Russo-Turkish War, 1877-1878}}. —Kirill Lokshin 03:13, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted. — Feb. 20, '06 [00:54] <freakofnurxture|talk>

Template:Elections1704-DE

[edit]

Template:Elections1704-DE (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
This template is just a paragraph of text. Unnecessary and should just be pasted into the article. JW1805 (Talk) 02:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was ditto. — Feb. 20, '06 [00:55] <freakofnurxture|talk>

Template:Elections1776-DE

[edit]

Template:Elections1776-DE (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
This template is just a paragraph of text. Unnecessary and should just be pasted into the article. JW1805 (Talk) 02:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_February_14&oldid=1089445089"