Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 December 11
December 11
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!?) 05:18, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I created this template some time ago as an alternative for Template:Painting, because that template treated every field automatically as a link and I was working on some articles where that was not very practical. Recently other editors have decided to change Template:Painting and now this one is no longer necessary. (And no longer used.) --Skarioffszky 20:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Unused, creator requests deletion. --- RockMFR 05:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. CattleGirl talk | e@ 07:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 00:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!?) 05:19, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
This template is either unwieldy or POV. By definition, all BBS software listed on Wikipedia is noteworthy, so what makes the ones listed in this template special? Unless there is some objective and verifiable criteria for which software goes in the list (such as confirmed sales or usage figures), there's no way of knowing if any one BBS package is more "noteworthy" than any other. The template also seems biased towards MS-DOS software. Keep in mind that for each major microcomputer brand, there were thriving BBS communities, each with dozens of different BBS software packages. —Psychonaut 01:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Category:Bulletin board system software handles the job nicely. --- RockMFR 01:43, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. By definition, all BBS software is noteworthy, and judging which is more noteworthy than others is POV. CattleGirl talk | e@ 07:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!?) 05:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Pointless template. According to the log, its original content was "Monosodium glutamate". Was deleted and replaced with current text which makes no sense. All the current tranclusions of the template seem to be cases where the user was trying to show the {{msg:template_name}} shortcut. --- RockMFR 00:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- delete per nom. → p00rleno (lvl 77) ←ROCKSCRS 20:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Template for a template not needed. CattleGirl talk | e@ 07:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.