Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 April 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 14, 2006

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Pagrashtak 01:27, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New Delhi infobox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Has been replaced by Template:India UT capital infobox (see New Delhi). Unused (I googled for word combination, so no subst's). SeventyThree(Talk) 16:45, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 13:00, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Awayuser (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
It's unnecessary since it's the same as Users on Wikibreak and Users Partially Active Osbus 14:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Also, as per the discussion on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive6#Continuing spambot attacks, these templates were created in February 2005, and were only used as a temporary way to track the pages protected against a spambot. This procedure is now obsolete and unused due to the current protection and semi-protection policies. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 14:24, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Template:Spambot (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Spambot notalk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

These two templates are redundant with any of several vandalism-related templates listed below, depending on circumstances. A spambot is just a vandal using a tool, and doesn't require a unique template. See also the associated category Protected against spambots.

// Pathoschild (admin / talk) 01:03, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.