Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 April 1
April 1, 2006
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete Circeus 17:35, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Same reasons as Template:Vermont State Highways below (though this one's not all that ugly). --SPUI (talk - RFC) 21:44, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete Circeus 17:35, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Same reasons as Template:Vermont State Highways below. --SPUI (talk - RFC) 21:43, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. same reason as given for VT. --Assawyer 17:16, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete Circeus 17:35, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Unused. Seems to have been intended for substing, but all routes now have articles, and so it is no longer needed if it ever was. --SPUI (talk - RFC) 21:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This was supposed to have been tossed in the SFD debate, and there was a consensus to delete it. But it never did get deleted. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- SFD was never the correct place for it. --SPUI (talk - RFC) 22:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Someone thought it was a stub template, but we didn't think that we should move it to TFD since it would prbably be better off deleted. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:27, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- SFD was never the correct place for it. --SPUI (talk - RFC) 22:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensu, keep Circeus 17:35, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Template:Nas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Another bulky band template. I usually compress it to include only major subpages, and not every album and single, but Nas only has one subpage, Nas discography. FuriousFreddy 19:22, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. The chronology box and the Nas discography are used instead of this big template. CG 12:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. This template brings each of the perspective pages together and could have a highr pontiental if we could start making more pages about Nas. File:Myscreenshot.jpg I Am Ri¢h! 01:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete Circeus 17:35, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Rather big and ugly. There are several alternatives for linking to the main list and the routes with adjacent numbers - see Route 8A (Massachusetts) and Route 9 (Massachusetts). --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 16:40, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Many of these have been deleted- Virginia to name one, and Oregon. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 19:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and replace with browse box. Polaron 01:25, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.