Jump to content

Wikipedia:Today's featured article oddities

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:TFAO)

The "Today's Featured Article" (TFA) section first appeared on the main page on February 22, 2004, featuring the article Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Rather than the full article being displayed on the main page, a summary (often described as a "blurb") appears, with a link to the full article appearing in bold. To start with, the rotation of TFAs was done by updating {{Feature}}. The selection did not change promptly at midnight UTC as it now does, and sometimes TFAs would appear for more or less than 24 hours.

The system of using daily templates, prepared in advance and automatically transcluded onto the main page, began on August 7, 2004. Since then, things have been a little more regular.

The general rules for the TFA section are these: only featured articles appear; there is only one TFA per day; each one is displayed for 24 hours; and only one image accompanies the blurb. Until a change in early 2017, there was also an additional rule that no FA could appear more than once as TFA. Most of the time the rules have been followed ... This is a list of times when something a bit different, intentionally or otherwise, has happened in the TFA section.

Featured content:

Featured article candidates (FAC):

Featured article review (FAR):

Today's featured article (TFA):

Featured article tools:

[edit]
[edit]
[edit]

A discussion in 2017 relaxed the rule about TFAs appearing for a second time. Following this, Rosetta Stone (which had first appeared on September 14, 2010) was re-featured on March 18, 2017.

The ones with something other than a featured article in the TFA slot

[edit]

The one when TFA was late

[edit]

The one with the shortest blurb

[edit]
  • On April 1, 2013, the hook for the featured article consisted of simply the character "?" (albeit a very large "?"), referring to the Indonesian film ?.

The ones with the most votes

[edit]

The ones with the most points

[edit]
  • For many years, until April 2014, the requests page used a points system to help indicate which articles were more deserving of appearing as TFA in the event of competition for the same date or similar articles being nominated. (Final version of the system) Factors used included: how long it had been since the article's promotion (with articles that had been promoted 1 or 2+ years ago gaining points); whether the article was from a section at WP:FA with <50 articles; whether it was a "vital article"; whether similar articles had run in the recent past (which could mean bonuses or penalties, depending on timing); whether it would be the author's first TFA; and to mark anniversaries (with various bonus points for multiples of 10 or 25).
  • The highest score under this system, as far as anyone can remember, was eleven points:
  • Had the points system still been in operation, Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/John A. Macdonald would have set a new record with twelve points: bicentenary of birth (6), level 4 vital article (4) and promoted over two years previously (2).

The ones with the most pictures in the blurb

[edit]
  • Middle Ages, which was TFA on September 12, 2013, had not one but five accompanying images, each illustrating different aspects of the topic. Which image a reader saw at any particular time was governed by {{random subpage}}, assisted by the main page's being purged every 15 minutes by a bot.
  • Metalloid, which was TFA for October 4, 2014, had six different images, one for each of the main metalloids. Random subpages were used to vary which metalloid image was displayed.
  • Elizabeth II, which was TFA on September 19, 2022, had a total of ten accompanying images, from 1943 to 2015, each from a different part of her life. The image that was shown was determined by the Random item template.

The ones with a theme spread over several days

[edit]

The ones that ran on April Fools' Day

[edit]

In some years, parts of the Main Page – including TFA – mark April Fools' Day:

See also

[edit]