Computing desk
< April 12	<< Mar \| April \| May >>	Current desk >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Computing Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

April 13

Karatsuba like idea for optimizing time search for algo minimax on chess-computer

Hi, there, big guys, I think that shoudnt be such a big news for You, I mean about this idea. For K+K plices, due to invertions, the time optimizing factor can be exponential for the time searching. Details are left to readers :-) Thank You , Florin747 (talk) 11:54, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, we're not here to do your homework. Elizium23 (talk) 12:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes , I guess You are right, coding never was one of my strong points. Thank You for reading this, and for Your reply, either. Florin747 (talk) 12:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can't even understand what you are getting at, but maybe it is related to alpha-beta pruning. 2601:648:8202:96B0:E0CB:579B:1F5:84ED (talk) 19:29, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For context, see Karatsuba algorithm.-gadfium 20:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thank You for the replies, I was thinking at the situation of avoding any invertions on 4 plices, basicaly optimizing the search on minmax algo with an factor of up to 4 for those 2 moves/4 plices. I was thinking about those 120 zeros for the minimax estimation search ( I mean 10^120 positions to be calculated, in case we dont wish to use some working memory, which might be helpful about that). Fot some minimax 40 depth moves search then will be able to get about 2^40 optimizing time factor which is about 10^12. There is more about this idea of mine (too) but I dont think I should boost around that , since chess is some hot topics all around the world and therefore it is very very well studied I would say. Thank You, for letting me post that, I find it very much fun in did! Florin747 (talk) 07:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hi, there, now I would like to pass You my FB page link ( I know that You will remove it soonly ), maybe You will give it a look to those Random base number self structuring shapes images that could be a start for using it for intermediary output for programmes, making the output easier to be nterpreted ,I meant. Anyway, its just some of my modest tryngs around the computer. Thank You! Florin747 (talk) 06:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC) https://www.facebook.com/matei.florin.77[reply]

oh-oh, my eye vision becomes more n more blury in this morning here, i mght need my meds now then trying some good rest. See You later! Florin747 (talk) 08:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hi, i think that link is abt me too :-) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHoO2uYIca8 Thank You! Florin747 (talk) 12:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, it is nearly Eastern Hollydays here, in my Country, and I am just wishing that God will help me for not bothering nor upseting The Yankee Gentlemen from Wikipedia by posting any more of my kinda messages on Their site, I mean on this site. Amin! Yours Respectfully, Matei Florin Florin747 (talk) 14:15, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amiga PAL resolution

The graphics chipset of the Amiga is capable of resolutions from 320×256 to 640×512. These use a 5/4 aspect ratio. However, I don't see such resolutions anywhere on the display resolution article. Are they included in any standard or were they specific to the Amiga only? JIP | Talk 23:20, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are more resolutions listed in list of common resolutions. 97.82.165.112 (talk) 11:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]