Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP editor has repeatedly restored this disputed content to the article: A fan who sent a text message to Cetrone regarding the Snyder Cut's existence later posted a doctored screenshot of them, falsely claiming that Cetrone confirmed the Snyder Cut's existence.
It was originally removed by editor Dcdiehardfan for being not noteworthy [1], before being restored by the IP editor, at which point I removed it before the IP editor restored it multiple times, with increasing personal attacks in their edit summaries directed towards Dcdiehardfan: Yet another case of sourced references deleted without reason. User is a repeated remover using WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT logic.
[2]; Do you not see what section it was put in? It's factually relevant to everything the extremist fanbase did throughout. Hence why someone included it in the first place and (once again) it was incoherently removed by an obvious biased fanboy who has repeatedly/illogically removed anything negative related to the movie or Snyder bit by bit while laughably claiming "cleaned up".
[3]; It's not "two separate editors", one of them is a factually proven troll.
[4]. The IP editor has refused to engage in the talk page discussion, where a third editor, JascaDucato, has said they agree that the content is not noteworthy. In response to a warning about their personal attacks on the IP's talk page, they responded with "stop the disruptive defending" LOL Piss off you pathetic troll-defending hypocrite. I repeatedly/effortlessly exposed the weirdo fanboy blanking out sourced info over and over solely because it was negative towards the movie. Soooo disruptive.
Reporting all of you now. And stop stalking my edits, douche.
At this point, it doesn't seem like that the IP editor is going to be willing to engage in a discussion about the content on the article's talk page, and is rather going to try to edit war the content in despite three other editors disagreeing with its inclusion. – notwally (talk) 03:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- TLDR: An IP editor has repeatedly restored content that three other editors disagree with, and is not willing to engage in the talk page discussion. – notwally (talk) 03:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- (Non admin comment) pages aren't generally protected for 1 IP address/account causing an issue, it is usually easier to block if thats neccessary. @Notwally Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 05:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Please semi-salt this talk page without an article that has now been created 3 times Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 03:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- List of awards and nominations received by Patrick Stewart (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent sock puppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 04:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Spree of new accounts coming to remove sourced content reflecting negatively on the subject of the page. GraziePrego (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2024 (UTC)