Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pending changes reviewer

I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has 92 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 20:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ahecht, ah, apologies. I didn't realize a "request moves" page existed, and I do not have move or merge permissions. I was simply undoing something that wasn't correct... hence why I requested move perms earlier so I could fix it. Ali Beary (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm requesting this right to protect Wikipedia from Vandals. By the way the 1 of the 2 revisions (both not accepted) in Curry was unaccepted without any reason and other maybe due to some misunderstanding by the reviewer of the WP:NOINDICSCRIPT & both were good faith.Although I am look as a newcomer, but this is a clean start account. If there is any other objection, I'll try to be explainable for it. Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 11 days and has 57 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 00:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You've only had an account for about 11 days, which isn't enough of a track record to demonstrate that you routinely edit. Furthermore, I saw in this edit that you want to become extended confirmed and a template editor "as soon as possible" which gives the impression that you want to collect hats. I don't feel comfortable with granting you this user right at this time. Fathoms Below (talk) 04:54, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, but I'm not collecting hats (to show off). Well I've always wanted to be a template editor & I was extended confirmed in my old account. (4yrs and 1071 edits before I clean started) Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:02, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry if I am offensive. But the point is that I never had,have or will have the intention to collect hats. Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
By "as soon as possible" I meant to fulfill my desire to contribute Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • please don't think that I'm doing this to change your mind. I'm just removing that show off tag.
Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:08, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I had the PCR userright, which was granted last year (request). While I had the flag, I didn't use it very much, so I requested the removal of the flag, which was granted. Since then, I keep finding myself looking at Special:PendingChanges and wanting to mark edits as reviewed. (Note that I also have rollback perms.) Thank you for your time and consideration! Relativity ⚡️ 01:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Fathoms Below (talk) 04:49, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]