Wikipedia:WikiProject Museums
Main page | Assessment | Guideline | Members | Popular Pages | Progress | Requested Articles | Requests for Expansion | Templates | Working with Museums |
This is a WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!
|
Shortcuts | WP:MUSEUMS, WP:MUSEUM |
---|---|
Category | Museums |
Portal | Museums |
Wikimedia Commons | Museums |
Parent project(s) | Arts |
Project banner template | {{WikiProject Museums}} |
Userbox | {{User Museums project}} |
Has goals? | Yes |
Assessment | Wikipedia:WikiProject_Museums/Assessment |
Popular pages | Wikipedia:WikiProject Museums/Popular pages |
Welcome to the Museums WikiProject! A chunk of this text has been stolen borrowed under GFDL ;) from other Wiki Projects.
- Goals
- Improve Wikipedia's coverage of museums.
- Improve quality of existing articles
- Expand smaller museums in non-English dominant countries where articles are little more than a sentence.
- Create guidelines for articles about museums.
- Scope
- The project covers all articles about museums in a wide range of disciplines and locations throughout the world. By member consensus, it does not include aquaria, herbaria, zoos and other non-museum 'collections' because these are well-covered in other projects.
- For those within the museum sector, and collaborations between Wikipedia and institutions, see Wikipedia:Advice for the cultural sector.
To Do
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Museums/Requested Articles: these articles have been requested, but not yet written
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Museums/Requests for Expansion: these stubs have been created, but they could do with some expansion
Ongoing cleanup
[edit]There is an ongoing cleanup/developing in the undeveloped stub articles of Category:Museums in Greece to determine which of them meet with notability standards, develop them to at least basic stubs and nominate for deletion all the rest. You can help here. Participants: User:Thaliapap, User:Hoverfish
Maintenance categories
[edit]A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Article Alerts
[edit]Did you know
- 18 Nov 2024 – Tomato Industrial Museum D. Nomikos (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Lajmmoore (t · c); see discussion
Articles for deletion
- 13 Nov 2024 – List of Western European paintings in Ukrainian museums (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Jaguarnik (t · c); see discussion (5 participants; relisted)
Featured article candidates
- 14 Nov 2024 – Merchant's House Museum (talk · edit · hist) was FA nominated by Epicgenius (t · c); see discussion
A-Class review
- undated – USS Texas (BB-35) (talk · edit · hist) was put up for A-Class review
Good article nominees
- 07 Sep 2024 – New York Hall of Science (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Epicgenius (t · c); start discussion
Good article reassessments
- 25 Sep 2024 – USS Texas (BB-35) (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Voorts (t · c); see discussion
Articles to be merged
- 23 Aug 2024 – List of U.S. state historical societies and museums (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to List of historical societies in the United States#State societies by M2545 (t · c); see discussion
- 12 Aug 2024 – Girl Scout Museum and Archives (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Girl Scouts of the USA#Activities and programs by Star Mississippi (t · c); see discussion
Articles to be split
- 26 Sep 2024 – The Untitled Space (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Fashionista345 (t · c); see discussion
- 28 Mar 2022 – Georgia Music Hall of Fame (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by AjaxSmack (t · c); see discussion
Articles for creation
- 21 Nov 2024 – Draft:Massimo De Carlo Gallery (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Jackbot33 (t · c)
- 07 Nov 2024 – Draft:Jennifer Sakai (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Beauxgoris (t · c)
- 05 Nov 2024 – Draft:Philadelphia College of Pharmacy (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Crimsonandgrayhawk (t · c)
- 30 Oct 2024 – Draft:SAPAR Contemporary Gallery + Incubator (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Sapar Contemporary (t · c)
- 20 Nov 2024 – Draft:Omori Nori Museum (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by StOctavius (t · c) was moved to Omori Nori Museum (talk · edit · hist) by CharlieMehta (t · c) on 21 Nov 2024
- 16 Nov 2024 – Draft:Aleksandr and Boris Arbuzov House-Museum (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by Kseni-kam (t · c) was accepted to Aleksandr and Boris Arbuzov House-Museum (talk · edit · hist) by Bkissin (t · c) on 21 Nov 2024
)
Articles needing tagging
[edit]A Bot/user using AWB is helping generate a list of articles that are in one or more of the museum subcats but not tagged for WP:Museum. Any help is welcome going through the list & removing those that shouldn't be tagged & tagging those that should. If there's a large list, it may be possible for a bot to work through the list
Deletion Discussions
[edit]In order to add any AfD/PRODs to the lists below, please follow the instructions here.
Museums and libraries AfDs
[edit]- List of cultural entities with sole naming rights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable hodgepodge of venues which have a naming rights sponsor. No apparent notability or sources to tie them together. No incoming links. See also a related discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sponsored sports venues. 162 etc. (talk) 06:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Theatre, Museums and libraries, Awards, Organizations, and Lists. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- delete What is conspicuously missing in the naming rights article is any definition of a "sole naming right". This seems to be something made up one day. Mangoe (talk) 13:04, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment, what in the world is a "cultural entity"? 35.139.154.158 (talk) 16:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Culturenet Cymru (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Culturenet Cymru was established as a company within the National Library of Wales for the purpose of creating a body that Welsh Government could fund outside of the NLW sponsorship arrangement, with a remit to develop online resources. The company was based in NLW, all the directors and officers were NLW staff, and the employees were subject to NLW regulations. The arrangement was wound up in 2016 and all of the projects were transferred directly into NLW. It was never independently notable, generating a couple of news articles (that I cannot now find) only when one employee, whose contract was terminated, alleged he had fixed an online poll they ran. That coverage did not explore the nature of the company, and my recollection is that the news media were directed to NLW itself. As such this is not notable and does not meet WP:NCORP. I was going to redirect to the NLW page but it is not mentioned there, and I do not feel a mention of the company is due there. Thus a redirect is not possible (no mention on the target page). I am therefore nominating here. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 20:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries, Companies, Popular culture, and Internet. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 20:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that it isn't notable enough for a stand-alone article, as I cannot find any significant coverage in independent sources. Redirect to 100 Welsh Heroes, its one notable project, where Culturenet Cymbru is briefly described (and is an article that has survived AfD). Schazjmd (talk) 21:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I searched for information about this company on every search engine but found nothing. I don’t believe it is notable or meets Wikipedia's notability criteria for companies (WP:NCORP). Baqi:) (talk) 08:49, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Merge to National Library of Wales per WP:ATD or keep for passing WP:SIGCOV. A basic WP:BEFORE search shows plenty of coverage in google books such as [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], etc This was a notable project and the content would be a reasonable subsection in the NLW article. I also see no issue with leaving it as a stand alone article. Either way, deletion or a redirect to 100 Welsh Heroes is not the answer as the organization was involved in multiple large digitization projects of note; some of which are the primary subject of journal articles viewable in this Google Scholar search. 4meter4 (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- SIGCOV must be more than a mention. Indeed, Culturenet must meet WP:NORG as the appropriate SNG. The guidance on SIGCOV may be found under WP:ORGDEPTH which says, inter alia,
Your references 2-6 are all passing mentions. "Culturenet's gathering the jewels" or a caption for an image, or "now available on..." are all passing mentions. None of these are SIGCOV by any margin, let alone ORGDEPTH. The first reference is longer. It has a paragraph about what CultureNet was remitted to do. It is not, to my mind, coverage at ORGDEPTH, but that one is moot in any case. The paragraph was written by CyMAL: Museums Archives and Libraries Wales for the Welsh Affairs Committee Evidence, included in a section on the National Library. CyMAL was a division of Welsh Government, and Welsh Government sponsor NLW. CyMAL funded Culturenet's GTJ and other such projects. This, then, is a primary source and not independent. It is Welsh Government telling the Welsh Affairs committee about the work it is doing. To meet WP:NORG (or WP:GNG for that matter), multiple sources must have significant coverage, and be independent, reliable secondary sources. See WP:SIRS. None of these meet these criteria. Redirecting to 100 Welsh Heroes per Schazjmd would be more sensible as a WP:ATD. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 17:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject is not sufficient to establish notability. Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization. Such coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements, and makes it possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization.
- SIGCOV must be more than a mention. Indeed, Culturenet must meet WP:NORG as the appropriate SNG. The guidance on SIGCOV may be found under WP:ORGDEPTH which says, inter alia,
- I disagree that the coverage is trivial. There are multiple journal articles with the organization in the title of the article in google scholar. These in combination with the book sources (of which I just randomly listed the first books in the search; but there were pages of book hits) would pass WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT. The scope of the Culturenet Cymru makes 100 Welsh Heroes a bad merge target; although it would be ok as a redirect. Doing that however, would lose encyclopedic information of value which would be WP:DUEWEIGHT in the article on the National Library of Wales. Given your argument that company has essentially been folded into the NLW in your deletion nomination, the NLW is clearly the better target for both a merge and a redirect.4meter4 (talk) 17:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
I disagree that the coverage is trivial.
To take just one of these as an example, we read: "All-Wales examples include Culturenet Cymru's Gathering the Jewels (20,000-plus items) and the National Library's Digital Mirror (0.5m-plus items)..." (Osmond, 2006). Now compare that text to the relevant section of ORGDEPTH I quote above. This is not significant coverage. Not under GNG and certainly not under NORG. And they are all at this level. Maybe the problem here is that your "randomly listed" selection is where the BEFORE was not carried out. Why do you think I am unfamiliar with that literature? But where is the deep or significant coverage about Culturenet? Where is the coverage that extends well beyond brief mentions? The information from which an article can be written? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC)- Yes, because cherry picking the weakest source of the bunch, and misrepresenting the quoted text in that source by taking it out of paragraph/section context is a balanced and fair way to do source analysis 🙄.4meter4 (talk) 19:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree that the coverage is trivial. There are multiple journal articles with the organization in the title of the article in google scholar. These in combination with the book sources (of which I just randomly listed the first books in the search; but there were pages of book hits) would pass WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT. The scope of the Culturenet Cymru makes 100 Welsh Heroes a bad merge target; although it would be ok as a redirect. Doing that however, would lose encyclopedic information of value which would be WP:DUEWEIGHT in the article on the National Library of Wales. Given your argument that company has essentially been folded into the NLW in your deletion nomination, the NLW is clearly the better target for both a merge and a redirect.4meter4 (talk) 17:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 20:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - As a (sometimes controversial) body funded by government, it should stay. Deb (talk) 16:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- It was a company, not an assembly sponsored public body. It needs to pass WP:NORG. Do you have independent secondary sources about the controversy? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 23:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- It was a government funded and run initiative, it was never a private institution/company. Read the sources.4meter4 (talk) 23:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- No, you are incorrect. Please read the nom. statement again. It was constituted as a company.[7] It was specifically arranged so that it was not run by the Welsh Government, and although it got project funding from the Government, this was in the manner that other companies are awarded project funding and it was not a sponsorship arrangement. So again, WP:NORG is the SNG. What sources do we have that meet WP:ORGDEPTH? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- A company run and funded by the government. I think you are splitting hairs.4meter4 (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- It was not run by the government. It was run by company employees under directorrship of employees of the National Library, which is itself not run by the government (although it has a Government remit letter). I am not splitting hairs. The whole point was to set it up as a company because it was not an arm of Government. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- See WP:WIKILAWYERING as it relates to following the spirit of policies.4meter4 (talk) 18:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- You are going to have to unpack this for me. What exactly are you arguing for here? That this company should not be subjected to the need to have significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources (WP:SIRS)? Why? because it was funded primarily through Government project funding? Note that WP:NORG says
The guidelines surely and evidently therefore apply to Culturenet Cymru PLC. It seems to me that if you are arguing (incorrectly in my view) that this was nothing but an arm of governemnt, it is even less notable. Its notability for a standalone page surely must derive from its separation from the National Library (whose staff were the company officers). It is either not notable because it was nothing but an arm of the library, or it may be notable as a standalone organisation - if it meets NORG. Which is it? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)This page is to help determine whether an organization (commercial or otherwise)...is a valid subject for a separate Wikipedia article dedicated solely to that organization.
- I'm saying that in this particular case, this specific company should be treated the way we would treat any government run and government funded program because in any way that essentially matters that's what this company was. It was created through government legislation, it was founded using tax payer dollars, and it was managed by a government institution. Trying to treat it like a normal for profit private business under WP:ORG policy doesn't seem to meet the spirit of our principals; particularly when the product being produced was for free public consumption within a national library. In otherwords, demanding WP:ORGCRIT here seems WP:POINTY.4meter4 (talk) 21:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- We do treat all such organisations this way See NORG "Commercial or otherwise". Note that I have throughout said NORG and not NCORP. Profit is not the issue. The lack of sources about the organisation is the issue. It needs to meet ORGCRIT because that is the relevant SNG as it would be for, say, a Government funded school. And I don't think you have read what POINTY means. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 22:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT comments aren't helpful. WP:ORGCRIT was created as a means of critiquing the notability of for-profit business like Google or Microsoft or any other clearly for-profit business. It wasn't designed to handle weird cases like this which involve government managing bodies and products which are being created for free public consumption in a weird blend of public-private partnership. This company's goals better allign with the goals of a non-profit and the scrutiny we developed to support the WP:NOTPROMO model for-profit companies under WP:ORGCRIT are not appropriately applied in the context of an organization that was essentially created to do large scale digitization projects and research in the context of a national library that has free access to people in Wales. At some point WP:COMMONSENSE has to come into play and a consideration of the spirit of our policies at the WP:Five Pillars. You are welcome to keep pushing WP:ORGCRIT, but I think its WP:POINTY to do so per WP:5P5 and not beneficial to the project.4meter4 (talk) 22:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- At this point you have accused me of cherry picking, misrepresentation, wikilawyering, Ididnthearthat and pointiness (twice). It is clear you are not going to assume good faith. I'll leave it there with you. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 23:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Well you have done some of those things. Cherry picking (be honest you picked the worst source out of the ones listed to highlight), misrepresentation (you did take that one source out of context of the paragraph), wikilawyering (you are being pedantic on a particular policy that wasn't designed to handle a company of this kind), Ididnthearthat (you were ignoring what I was saying and repeating arguments after every editors comments that disagreed) and pointiness (you are trying to make a point with ORGCRIT after it was pointed out to why it doesn't fit well in this context). I don't think you are intentionally trying to be disruptive, and that you are contributing with good intent and in the best way you know how. I do think you have lost perspective, and are not listening well to what other editors are saying.4meter4 (talk) 23:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- At this point you have accused me of cherry picking, misrepresentation, wikilawyering, Ididnthearthat and pointiness (twice). It is clear you are not going to assume good faith. I'll leave it there with you. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 23:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT comments aren't helpful. WP:ORGCRIT was created as a means of critiquing the notability of for-profit business like Google or Microsoft or any other clearly for-profit business. It wasn't designed to handle weird cases like this which involve government managing bodies and products which are being created for free public consumption in a weird blend of public-private partnership. This company's goals better allign with the goals of a non-profit and the scrutiny we developed to support the WP:NOTPROMO model for-profit companies under WP:ORGCRIT are not appropriately applied in the context of an organization that was essentially created to do large scale digitization projects and research in the context of a national library that has free access to people in Wales. At some point WP:COMMONSENSE has to come into play and a consideration of the spirit of our policies at the WP:Five Pillars. You are welcome to keep pushing WP:ORGCRIT, but I think its WP:POINTY to do so per WP:5P5 and not beneficial to the project.4meter4 (talk) 22:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- We do treat all such organisations this way See NORG "Commercial or otherwise". Note that I have throughout said NORG and not NCORP. Profit is not the issue. The lack of sources about the organisation is the issue. It needs to meet ORGCRIT because that is the relevant SNG as it would be for, say, a Government funded school. And I don't think you have read what POINTY means. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 22:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm saying that in this particular case, this specific company should be treated the way we would treat any government run and government funded program because in any way that essentially matters that's what this company was. It was created through government legislation, it was founded using tax payer dollars, and it was managed by a government institution. Trying to treat it like a normal for profit private business under WP:ORG policy doesn't seem to meet the spirit of our principals; particularly when the product being produced was for free public consumption within a national library. In otherwords, demanding WP:ORGCRIT here seems WP:POINTY.4meter4 (talk) 21:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- You are going to have to unpack this for me. What exactly are you arguing for here? That this company should not be subjected to the need to have significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources (WP:SIRS)? Why? because it was funded primarily through Government project funding? Note that WP:NORG says
- See WP:WIKILAWYERING as it relates to following the spirit of policies.4meter4 (talk) 18:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- It was not run by the government. It was run by company employees under directorrship of employees of the National Library, which is itself not run by the government (although it has a Government remit letter). I am not splitting hairs. The whole point was to set it up as a company because it was not an arm of Government. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- A company run and funded by the government. I think you are splitting hairs.4meter4 (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- No, you are incorrect. Please read the nom. statement again. It was constituted as a company.[7] It was specifically arranged so that it was not run by the Welsh Government, and although it got project funding from the Government, this was in the manner that other companies are awarded project funding and it was not a sponsorship arrangement. So again, WP:NORG is the SNG. What sources do we have that meet WP:ORGDEPTH? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- It was a government funded and run initiative, it was never a private institution/company. Read the sources.4meter4 (talk) 23:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not seeing extensive coverage. A search in ["Culturenet Cymru" -wikipedia site:.bbc.com] yielded little. As well as 2 google news hits. and passing mentions in google books. Fails WP:ORG. There is no inherent notability in being government funded. This source and this found by 4meter are 1 line mentions and not SIGCOV. and I can't find specific reference in this. This one is 2 lines of mention in a whole book. LibStar (talk) 00:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- @LibStar Would you support a merge to National Library of Wales per WP:ATD?4meter4 (talk) 00:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on merge/redirect to National Library of Wales as an WP:ATD?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Museums and libraries Proposed Deletions
[edit]- Dallas Contemporary (via WP:PROD on 3 November 2024)
Recognized content
[edit]This is a list of recognized content, updated weekly by JL-Bot (talk · contribs) (typically on Saturdays). There is no need to edit the list yourself. If an article is missing from the list, make sure it is tagged (e.g. {{WikiProject Museums}}) or categorized correctly and wait for the next update. See WP:RECOG for configuration options. |
Featured articles
[edit]Biblioteca Marciana • Bodiam Castle • Bruce Castle • Ceilings of the Natural History Museum, London • Chartwell • The Cloisters • USS Constitution • Cragside • Empire of the Sultans • Ford Piquette Avenue Plant • Hajj: Journey to the Heart of Islam • Ham House • Hockey Hall of Fame • Icelandic Phallological Museum • Literary Hall • Little Moreton Hall • Ludwigsburg Palace • Manzanar • Mary Rose • USS Missouri (BB-63) • Museum of Bad Art • Norton Priory • Palazzo Pitti • Franklin Peale • Secretum (British Museum) • Tower of London • John Treloar (museum administrator) • HMS Warrior (1860) • West Wycombe Park
Former featured articles
[edit]Baden-Powell House • New Orleans Mint
Featured article candidates
[edit]Featured lists
[edit]Leuchtenberg Gallery • List of Smithsonian museums • List of video games in the Museum of Modern Art • List of museums in Somerset • List of National Treasures of Japan (crafts: others)
A-Class articles
[edit]Good articles
[edit]Alatskivi Castle • Arnolfini, Bristol • Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art • Barrington Court • Bath Abbey • Bath Assembly Rooms • Beckford's Tower • Beit Al Quran • HMS Belfast • Congregation Beth Israel (Scottsdale, Arizona) • Blagdon Lake • Blaise Castle Estate • British Engineerium • British Library • Byne's disease • Casa de Estudillo • Churchill War Rooms • Clevedon Court • Clinton Presidential Center • Coleridge Cottage • Copia (museum) • Craigflower Manor and Schoolhouse • Croatian Natural History Museum • Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens • Currency Building • DakshinaChitra • Debbane Palace • Derwent Valley Mills • Deshong Art Museum • Dia Bridgehampton • DuSable Black History Museum and Education Center • Dunster Castle • Dunster Working Watermill • Dyrham Park • Ebenezer Avery House • Eisenhower National Historic Site • Eldridge Street Synagogue • Ellwood House • Farleigh Hungerford Castle • Fort Dansborg • Frick Collection • Fyne Court • Garbage Museum • Jordan Geller • Getty Center • Getty Villa • Glastonbury Abbey • Glenstone • Golden Age of Trucking Museum • Alice Gray • SS Great Britain • Gwinnett Environmental & Heritage Center • Hallie Ford Museum of Art • Holy Jesus Hospital • Imperial War Museum Duxford • Imperial War Museum • Imperial War Museum North • Indianapolis Museum of Art • Intrepid Museum • Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum theft • Jewel Tower • John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum • William B. Jordan • Kenilworth Castle • Kew Herbarium • Khalili Collection of Aramaic Documents • King John's Hunting Lodge, Axbridge • Kingston Lacy • La Nube • Lacock Abbey • Letocetum • Louvre Abu Dhabi • Louvre • Lyme Park • Lytes Cary • Madame Tussauds Hong Kong • USS Massachusetts (BB-59) • Anna Maria Luisa de' Medici • Merchant's House Museum • Montacute House • Morgan Library & Museum • Morris–Jumel Mansion • Museum de Oude Wolden • Museum of Contemporary Art Australia • Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago • Museum of Socialist Art • My Old Kentucky Home State Park • Napoleonic looting of art • National Gallery • National Museum of Beirut • National Museum of African Art • National Press Monument • USS North Carolina (BB-55) • Old Korean Legation Museum • Old Stone House (Washington, D.C.) • Palais Rohan, Strasbourg • Palanga Amber Museum • Pearl Harbor Aviation Museum • Penrhyn Castle • Petersen Rock Garden
Reached maximum of 100 out of 129 (full list)
Former good articles
[edit]City and Town Hall (Rochelle, Illinois) • Flat Top Manor • Forbidden City • Juliana Force • Gunston Hall • Harness Racing Museum & Hall of Fame • Kentucky Railway Museum • Mark Twain House • Met Gala • The Museum of Curiosity • Museum of the Portuguese Language • North Carolina Transportation Museum • Sistine Chapel • Tower Building of the Little Rock Arsenal • Vilnius Castle Complex • White Pine Village
Good article nominees
[edit]Featured pictures
[edit]File:001 Chateau de Chillon and Dents du Midi Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg • File:2018 - Château fort de Lourdes.jpg • File:44444 חדרו של דוד בן גוריון בצריף בשדה בוקר.jpg • File:BMW Welt Night.jpg • File:Bath Abbey Eastern Stained Glass, Somerset, UK - Diliff.jpg • File:Bath Abbey Exterior, Somerset, UK - Diliff.jpg • File:Bath Abbey Nave Fan Vaulting, Somerset, UK - Diliff.jpg • File:Berlin Neue Nationalgalerie asv2021-11 img1.jpg • File:Chapel Royal 360x180, Dublin Castle, Dublin, Ireland - Diliff.jpg • File:Christchurch Art Gallery, Christchurch, New Zealand.jpg • File:Craigdarroch Castle just after sunset - view from the west, Victoria, Canada.jpg • File:Ely Cathedral Lady Chapel, Cambridgeshire, UK - Diliff.jpg • File:Ely Cathedral Octagon Lantern 3, Cambridgeshire, UK - Diliff.jpg • File:Hagia Sophia Mars 2013.jpg • File:Henriette Mayer van den Bergh - Van Lerius.jpg • File:Kilmainham Gaol Main Hall 2016-06-03.jpg • File:Kitt Peak National Observatory in the Quinlan Mountains, 2023.jpg • File:Louvre 2007 02 24 c.jpg • File:Marburg asv2022-02 img18 Castle.jpg • File:Museo Estatal de Historia, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 49.jpg • File:Museo Príncipe Felipe, Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias, Valencia, España, 2014-06-29, DD 56.JPG • File:Museum of the History of Polish Jews in Warsaw Main exhibition Gwoździec synagogue.jpg • File:Musée Galliera, Paris 21 July 2017.jpg • File:Narva asv2022-04 img09 Castle.jpg • File:Portal, Pitam Niwas Chowk, City Palace, Jaipur, 20191218 1000 9059.jpg • File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-St Michael's Castle 02.jpg • File:Roman Baths in Bath Spa, England - July 2006.jpg • File:Ruine Aggstein 02.JPG • File:SL Colombo asv2020-01 img10 National Museum.jpg • File:Schloss Hohenschwangau 2021.jpg • File:Schloss Sigmaringen 2022.jpg • File:Segovia - Alcázar de Segovia 22 2017-10-24.jpg • File:Wroclaw-Rathaus.jpg
Former featured pictures
[edit]Did you know? articles
[edit]Martha Heasley Cox Center for Steinbeck Studies (2024-11-15) • Irish Museum of Time (2024-11-11) • New York Hall of Science (2024-10-27) • Trade Fair Palace (2024-10-12) • Victoria Siddall (2024-10-11) • La Nube (2024-09-23) • Morgan Library & Museum (2024-09-15) • Henrik Igityan National Centre for Aesthetics (2024-08-22) • Mercer Art Gallery (2024-08-17) • The American Pigeon Museum & Library (2024-08-15) • Poozeum (2024-08-13) • Sophienburg Museum and Archives (2024-07-29) • Peale's Philadelphia Museum (2024-06-06) • Lyceum Theatre (Boston) (2024-06-03) • Galileo's middle finger (2024-05-30) • Eldridge Street Synagogue (2024-05-24) • Heaven on Earth: Art from Islamic Lands (2024-05-19) • Herodian Quarter (2024-04-12) • Frick Collection (2024-03-31) • Safe House Black History Museum (2024-03-21) • Adila Laïdi-Hanieh (2024-01-28) • Van Cortlandt House (2024-01-25) • Empire of the Sultans (2024-01-18) • Kansas Business Hall of Fame (2024-01-06) • Al Qarara Cultural Museum (2023-12-28) • Springfield Science Museum (2023-12-27) • Palestine Museum of Natural History (2023-12-01) • Morris–Jumel Mansion (2023-11-23) • Deshong Art Museum (2023-11-22) • Merchant's House Museum (2023-11-04) • Intrepid Museum (2023-10-11) • Mitzura Arghezi (2023-10-06) • Ni'isjoohl totem pole (2023-10-04) • Museum of Norwich at the Bridewell (2023-09-25) • Gladys Quander Tancil (2023-08-09) • National Jewellery Museum (Morocco) (2023-07-12) • Republican Palace Museum (2023-06-07) • Equestrian Portrait of Count Stanislas Potocki (2023-06-02) • Richard Childress Racing Museum (2023-04-08) • Powis Castle (2023-03-24) • Rancho Obi-Wan (2023-03-20) • Penrhyn Castle (2023-03-17) • Paul Delvaux Museum (2023-01-08) • Hajj: Journey to the Heart of Islam (2022-12-31) • Hasanpaşa Gasworks (2022-11-01) • Pokémon Fossil Museum (2022-10-31) • Patterson's Spade Mill (2022-10-28) • Gwinnett Environmental & Heritage Center (2022-09-16) • Bangabandhu Memorial Museum (2022-09-13) • BlossomWatch (2022-08-21) • Knowles Mill (2022-08-11) • Museo Cabeza de Juárez (2022-07-28) • Deutsches Romantik-Museum (2022-07-28) • Sakhalin Regional Museum (2022-06-19) • The Most Dangerous Animal in the World (2022-05-31) • Puente de Fierro (2022-05-28) • Fosterfields (2022-05-20) • Ashton Hawkins (2022-04-27) • Museum of Sexual Cultures (2022-04-11) • Froggyland (2022-04-09) • Napoleonic looting of art (2022-04-08) • Horpyna Vatchenko (2022-04-02) • Alena Aladava (2022-03-21) • Dow's Hill Interpretation Centre (2022-03-07) • Museum of Classic Sci-Fi (2022-03-03) • Casa Rull Museum (2022-02-21) • International Vinegar Museum (2022-02-14) • Stahls Automotive Collection (2022-02-11) • Museum of Contemporary Art Australia (2022-02-07) • Stanton Catlin (2022-01-09) • Phil Silvers Archival Museum (2022-01-02) • Wenzhou Museum (2021-12-19) • West Virginia Music Hall of Fame (2021-12-01) • Maison James Norman Hall (2021-11-26) • Harry Ferris Brazenor (2021-10-26) • Jersey Maritime Museum (2021-10-23) • Ham House (2021-10-17) • Report on the restitution of African cultural heritage (2021-09-21) • National Museum of Vanuatu (2021-09-08) • Tāoga Niue Museum (2021-09-03) • Huanaki Cultural Centre & Museum (2021-09-03) • Cook Islands National Museum (2021-09-02) • James Dickinson (taxidermist) (2021-08-28) • Land of Lost Content (museum) (2021-08-27) • Leeds Tiger (2021-07-24) • Jordan Geller (2021-07-08) • National Museum of Ireland – Decorative Arts and History (2021-06-28) • Amna Suraka (2021-06-18) • Casa Anchieta (2021-06-12) • Robert Louis Stevenson Museum (2021-06-05) • Museum of French Art (2021-05-31) • Musée de l'Amérique francophone (2021-05-18) • Musée Archéologique de Dijon (2021-05-18) • Museum of Literature Ireland (2021-05-18) • Kosrae State Museum (2021-05-18) • Kimiuo Aisek Memorial Museum (2021-05-18) • Jesús Soto Museum of Modern Art (2021-05-18) • Michael Xufu Huang (2021-05-07) • Currency Building (2021-05-05) • Wilson-Wodrow-Mytinger House (2021-04-24)
Reached maximum of 100 out of 800 (full list)
Main page featured articles
[edit]Secretum (British Museum) (2024-10-03) • Empire of the Sultans (2024-07-23) • Hajj: Journey to the Heart of Islam (2023-05-17) • Ham House (2022-02-28) • Biblioteca Marciana (2021-03-25) • Ceilings of the Natural History Museum, London (2020-07-30) • Baden-Powell House (2020-02-08) • Chartwell (2019-09-29) • Ludwigsburg Palace (2019-05-18) • The Cloisters (2018-12-01) • Ford Piquette Avenue Plant (2018-06-16) • Cragside (2018-02-09) • Literary Hall (2017-09-23) • HMS Warrior (1860) (2015-12-29) • USS Constitution (2015-02-20) • Franklin Peale (2014-04-14) • John Treloar (museum administrator) (2013-11-11) • Icelandic Phallological Museum (2013-03-16) • Little Moreton Hall (2013-01-12) • Bodiam Castle (2011-09-15) • Tower of London (2010-09-29) • Norton Priory (2010-08-22) • Mary Rose (2010-07-19) • Bruce Castle (2009-07-02) • Museum of Bad Art (2009-04-01) • Manzanar (2008-04-26) • Hockey Hall of Fame (2008-03-07) • West Wycombe Park (2007-07-03) • New Orleans Mint (2007-03-07) • Palazzo Pitti (2006-03-15) • USS Missouri (BB-63) (2005-09-02)
In the News articles
[edit]Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City (2021-07-22) • Margaret Weston (2021-01-16) • Ricardo Brennand (2020-04-26) • Singer Laren (2020-03-31) • National Museum of Brazil fire (2018-09-03) • National Museum of Brazil (2018-09-03) • Cheryll Sotheran (2017-12-31) • National Museum of Natural History, New Delhi (2016-04-28) • Bardo National Museum attack (2015-03-18) • Jewish Museum of Belgium shooting (2014-05-25) • Neues Museum (2009-10-18) • Acropolis Museum (2009-06-20)
Picture of the day pictures
[edit]File:Narva asv2022-04 img09 Castle.jpg (2024-11-07) • File:Schloss Sigmaringen 2022.jpg (2024-09-07) • File:Portal, Pitam Niwas Chowk, City Palace, Jaipur, 20191218 1000 9059.jpg (2024-03-30) • File:Museo Príncipe Felipe, Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias, Valencia, España, 2014-06-29, DD 56.JPG (2024-03-19) • File:001 Chateau de Chillon and Dents du Midi Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg (2024-02-10) • File:Ely Cathedral Lady Chapel, Cambridgeshire, UK - Diliff.jpg (2024-01-20) • File:2018 - Château fort de Lourdes.jpg (2024-01-10) • File:Berlin Neue Nationalgalerie asv2021-11 img1.jpg (2023-10-25) • File:Schloss Hohenschwangau 2021.jpg (2023-10-13) • File:Museo Estatal de Historia, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 49.jpg (2023-10-02) • File:Segovia - Alcázar de Segovia 22 2017-10-24.jpg (2022-10-07) • File:SL Colombo asv2020-01 img10 National Museum.jpg (2022-04-04) • File:Museum of the History of Polish Jews in Warsaw Main exhibition Gwoździec synagogue.jpg (2022-01-08) • File:44444 חדרו של דוד בן גוריון בצריף בשדה בוקר.jpg (2021-06-05) • File:Musée Galliera, Paris 21 July 2017.jpg (2021-03-06) • File:Bath Abbey Eastern Stained Glass, Somerset, UK - Diliff.jpg (2021-02-28) • File:Christchurch Art Gallery, Christchurch, New Zealand.jpg (2021-01-20) • File:Wroclaw-Rathaus.jpg (2020-11-28) • File:Craigdarroch Castle just after sunset - view from the west, Victoria, Canada.jpg (2020-09-03) • File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-St Michael's Castle 02.jpg (2020-05-20) • File:Kilmainham Gaol Main Hall 2016-06-03.jpg (2020-05-13) • File:Ruine Aggstein 02.JPG (2020-01-11) • File:Roman Baths in Bath Spa, England - July 2006.jpg (2019-11-15) • File:Bath Abbey Exterior, Somerset, UK - Diliff.jpg (2019-10-02) • File:Bath Abbey Nave Fan Vaulting, Somerset, UK - Diliff.jpg (2018-09-15) • File:Chapel Royal 360x180, Dublin Castle, Dublin, Ireland - Diliff.jpg (2018-06-14) • File:Henriette Mayer van den Bergh - Van Lerius.jpg (2018-04-03) • File:Ely Cathedral Octagon Lantern 3, Cambridgeshire, UK - Diliff.jpg (2016-09-13) • File:Hagia Sophia Mars 2013.jpg (2014-11-20) • File:BMW Welt Night.jpg (2010-05-12) • File:Louvre 2007 02 24 c.jpg (2008-03-27) • File:Nat-gall-lond-tr-sq2.jpg (2004-07-31)
Categories
[edit]Category:Museums and Category:Exhibitions are the primary categories for this project. Many subcats can be found from those links.
Resources
[edit]Some resources which may be useful for those writing articles about museums:
- Culture24 – information on many UK museums
- Visitor statistics for UK attractions
- Monthly museum & gallery visits figures from the UK's Department for Culture, Media and Sport
- Geograph (for photos in the UK) is really good & all CC licensed so can be used – there is even a simple template {{geograph | image-number | author}} for adding them on upload which marks them for transfer to commons.
- Museums: Virtual Library museums pages (VLmp)
- MuseumRegister | an international directory of museums in all categories
Related projects
[edit]- Architecture
- History
- History of Science
- Libraries
- Military History
- National Register of Historic Places
- Visual arts
See also
[edit]- Wikipedia:Museum projects
- WP:GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives & Museums)
A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.