Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 January 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion

(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2009 January 13)

< January 12	January 14 >

January 13

St_roch_ice.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:St_roch_ice.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ds13 (notify | contribs).

i can't find this in the national archives to verify the copyright status. (many other images of the ship are available, however) Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
it could easily be one of the ones not online, but this image will likely be just as good for the article (cropped I think). Raeky (talk) 13:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Hildebrandt-Greg and Tim.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hildebrandt-Greg and Tim.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by GentlemanGhost (notify | contribs).

The image's resolution too low and pixelated to be of use. Marcus Brute (talk) 01:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Admittedly, it's not great. But so far, no one has replaced it with a better image. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I doubt such an image would be a benefit to the article, no image is likely better. Raeky (talk) 13:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I would agree that it's quality is not the best but remember this is being used under fair use. Until someone can replace it with a better/free image, it should remain. RedWolf (talk) 17:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

A Carnival Christmas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Papa November (talk) 20:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Carnival Christmas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ibaranoff24 (notify | contribs).

Alternate album cover with no commentary at all about it in the article. As the article already has a non-free image this one fails WP:NFCC#3a as excessive use. The rationale on the image page Image is used to illustrate the text next to which it appears, which describes the alternate album cover. is simply incorrect as there is no discussion at all about the image in the article, just the note reissued in 1997 by Island Records with alternate artwork.. Without critical commentary the image fails WP:NFCC#8 as it does not significantly increase reader's understanding but is instead simply decorative. Peripitus (Talk) 03:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as excessive/decorative use of non-free content, and poor fair use rationale. Stifle (talk) 12:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Provision of Artwork is a fact itself which requires illustrating. Use of this image is in context of the article, is correctly licensed and provided with an adequate fair use rationale. whether or not it adds to so called ‘significant understanding’ will vary from person to person and is purely subjective and not a reason for deletion on the say so of a single editor. Removal would harm article. Archivey (talk) 14:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Cover is very different. (See article A Carnival Christmas). Per WP:NFC, showing the identifying images of albums is considered significant in the context of improving reader understanding of the topic of the article. This image does just that. Jheald (talk) 12:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:NFC criteria. Two images is clearly minimal use under criteria #3, and criteria #8 is met as the alternate album covers cannot be adequately described textually, therefore, the image significantly increases the reader's understanding.--2008Olympian^chitchat 07:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sonuenwiki.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sonuenwiki.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Falak11mufc (notify | contribs).

orphaned, appears to be photoshopped (badly) image, UE Skier Dude (talk) 06:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

DDH Barrow.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DDH Barrow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stevvvv4444 (notify | contribs).

Low quality image - we now have high quality images of the shipbuilding complex in question: File:BAE Systems from Walney.jpg & File:Astute2cropped.jpg Mark83 (talk) 10:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

UUchalice.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:UUchalice.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DryGrain (notify | contribs).

no source, unclear copyright status (was this really published at a time that would make it PD?), superseded by File:Flaming Chalice.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Iolanipalacemartiallaw.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iolanipalacemartiallaw.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gerald_Farinas (notify | contribs).

copyright holder not identified (museum is probably not copyright holder), no reason given that this would be PD (1941 photo) Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Thujone546-80-5.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thujone546-80-5.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Latitudinarian (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, superseded by File:Beta-thujone.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Dickhead (copy).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as I7 by Maxim (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dickhead (copy).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Technut (notify | contribs).

Low-quality/low-resolution, home-made vanity image of user's penis. Wikipedia is not DudesNude. Outsider80^(User0529) (talk) 13:23, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - Totally unencyclopaedic and pornographic. (Perhaps certain admins who take so much pleasure in deleting good faith work, would spend as much effort patrolling the Encyclopaedia for images like this instead). Archivey (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ambulance.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ambulance.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Treats_for_taking_tests... (notify | contribs).

Self made built on a non-free logo, orphan. O sama K 13:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

000000_Bullet.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Keep - according to the below it is not orphaned though I can't see how to verify this. - Peripitus (Talk) 02:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:000000_Bullet.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ævar_Arnfjörð_Bjarmason (notify | contribs).

Old uploaded, very small, unusable, orphan image. OsamaK 13:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not an orphan, it's used in my CSS style which several other people also use. --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 16:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

1_pixel_transparent.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1_pixel_transparent.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cantus (notify | contribs).

Old uploaded, very small, unusable, orphan image. O sama K 13:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_mathematics.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_mathematics.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Silmarillion (notify | contribs).

Replaced (File:Nuvola apps edu mathematics-p.svg) O sama K 14:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

50px-Valencia.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:50px-Valencia.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eddpayne (notify | contribs).

Replaced (File:Flag of the Land of Valencia (2x3 ratio).svg) O sama K 14:09, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

75PL.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:75PL.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Witkacy (notify | contribs).

Replaced (File:Blue plus square.svg) O sama K 14:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

TheWinnerRecord.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - PD in US (published abroad before 1923)

File:TheWinnerRecord.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Infrogmation (notify | contribs).

no date given - when was this single manufactured, why is it in public domain? Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Label is from about 1920, between when Edison Bell restored colour printing at the end of WWI and the redesign of the label c. 1922. However when I scanned and uploaded this to Wikipedia in 2003 I was thinking of what we now call PD-US rules; as this was a UK printing that doesn't apply and I don't know enough about UK copyright laws to know if this might still be under copyright in the UK. (note: company went under in the Great Depression, c. 1933). No objection to deletion if better copyright info not forthcoming. Alternatively, since we seem to have no alternative free illustration for the article on the historic record label, might be retagged for fair use within the article. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - if necessary, {{PD-US-1923-abroad}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ask1.wav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ask1.wav (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NohatBot (notify | contribs).

No source, There is already File:En-us-ask.ogg. O sama K 16:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ask2.wav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ask2.wav (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NohatBot (notify | contribs).

No source, There is already File:En-us-ask.ogg. O sama K 16:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ask3.wav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ask3.wav (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NohatBot (notify | contribs).

No source, There is already File:En-us-ask.ogg. O sama K 16:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Arkansas1.wav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arkansas1.wav (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NohatBot (notify | contribs).

No source, Orphan, there is already File:En-us-Arkansas.ogg. O sama K 17:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Arkansas2.wav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arkansas2.wav (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NohatBot (notify | contribs).

No source, Orphan, there is already File:En-us-Arkansas.ogg. O sama K 17:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Xenosapienvinyl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xenosapienvinyl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Brujoowns (notify | contribs).

This version of the cover is not discussed at all, and was a limited release version. The other version is already being used for identification purposes, this one is not needed. J Milburn (talk) 18:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Come Clarity.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Come Clarity.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dmiles21 (notify | contribs).

This cover is not discussed in the article, and the other is already used. It is not required. J Milburn (talk) 18:38, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Cm cults-koresh ho.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 January 21#Cm cults-koresh ho.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 21:37, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cm cults-koresh ho.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 75pickup (notify | contribs).

Copyrighted image copied from a news source fails WP:NFCC#2 (there's even a "buy photo'" link on the source!). Damiens.rf 12:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_January_13&oldid=1088719894"