Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 November 11
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
November 11
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G6 by Theresa knott (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Waves reflecting from a curved mirror.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Theresa knott (notify | contribs).
- The image does not accurately represent reflection by a curved mirror. In the image, the wavefronts appear to converge to the center of curvature of the mirror. This is incorrect. A plane wave reflected from a curved mirror converges to a focal point half-way between the mirror and the center of curvature. This image is flawed and should not be used for any purpose. Srleffler (talk) 04:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The figure is indeed flawed. The reflected wavefronts appear to have equal phase on the mirror surface, which can't be correct. An accurate drawing will show that the actual focus is halfway between the curvature center and the mirror surface. — AdiJapan 07:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This can be done as a speedy can't it? Theresa Knott | token threats 06:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If you're the author and only major contributor, you can {{db-author}} it. —Angr 06:59, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Updated war map.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gty450 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned Image. Additionally, it is POV to claim that the War on Drugs in the United States is a major conflict. See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The American Drug War — J3ff (talk) 04:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A clear case of WP:OR via image. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 21:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Logo for a 'company' whose article was overwhelmingly deleted. No real encyclopaedic use. CalendarWatcher (talk) 05:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A somewhat out-of-focus shot of a damaged car, used in a now-deleted biographical article. No earthly encyclopaedic purpose I can image. CalendarWatcher (talk) 05:43, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- An out-of-focus shot of a damaged car, used in a now-deleted biographical article. No earthly encyclopaedic purpose I can imagine. CalendarWatcher (talk) 05:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A photograph of the interior of a damaged car, used in a now-deleted biographical article. No earthly encyclopaedic purpose I can imagine here. CalendarWatcher (talk) 05:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Girls in sauna.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hollyop (notify | contribs).
- Unused and unencyclopedic; absent uploader. —Angr 06:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because the girls are cuteDelete, no encyclopedic purpoose. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 15:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: - Keep - Peripitus (Talk) 10:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Best I Ever Had Single- Gary Allan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Publichall (notify | contribs).
- Not a single cover. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 15:12, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes it is Link to ruckus music entry Publichall (talk) 01:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Angr (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Douglas_3892.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:--Nikkeynikkey (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)#Image:Douglas_3892.jpg listed for deletion|--Nikkeynikkey (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)]] ([{{fullurl:User_talk:--Nikkeynikkey (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro§ion=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/--Nikkeynikkey (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)|contribs]]).[reply]
- OB "Douglas_3892.jpg" - obsoleted by "Douglas_3892_new.jpg" Nikkeynikkey (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Welcometovasign.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by William_Grimes (notify | contribs).
- derivative of copyrighted sign (bird and flowers certainly are creative) Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:17, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You can actually delete this because it is already on the commons. I don't think the creative argument holds. There's a whole category of such signs that it would apply to.--Patrick «» 02:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:OldLovitz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MovieMan123 (notify | contribs).
- Image found all over internet. Googling Lovitz Southland brought it straight up Quentin X (talk) 23:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.