Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 May 25

< May 24	May 26 >

May 25

Image:Chaitra and friend.jpg

Image:Chaitra and friend.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jpupier (notify | contribs).

Image is only used in the userpage of the uploader, that too, for malicious purposes. Note that the userpage is also considered for deletion. Unencyclopedic Ravichandar _{My coffee shop} 18:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Giveit2meofficalsinglecover.jpg

Image:Giveit2meofficalsinglecover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JoFerg (notify | contribs).

Duplicate image of GIVEIT2MEOFFICALCOVER.jpg Alkclark (talk) 17:59, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chaithra Vasudeva 2007 11 13.jpg

Image:Chaithra Vasudeva 2007 11 13.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jpupier (notify | contribs).

Image is only used in the userpage of the uploader, that too, for malicious purposes. Note that the userpage is also considered for deletion. Unencyclopedic Ravichandar _{My coffee shop} 17:55, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GIVEIT2MEOFFICALCOVER.jpg

Image:GIVEIT2MEOFFICALCOVER.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JoFerg (notify | contribs).

The image was previously deleted by admins (3 times) because the image is a fanmade cover and the user is posing it as the "official cover" The link[1] he or she obtained the image from clearly states underneath the image that it is an unofficial fanmade cover. I have also found a blog site[2] with the exact same image with the caption cover made by me. This is clearly a fan cover and I cannot understand why this user sees otherwise. At this point, it is blatant vandalism Alkclark (talk) 17:49, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Riots.ogg

Image:Riots.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joaomiguelluis (notify | contribs).

The article Hands On Approach describes this file as "Unreleased. A new track from the upcoming 4th album of the band, yet to be named." This makes the authenticity of the file questionable, especially since the uploader claims to have created it himself. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 02:33, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It also makes its legality questionable; courts have historically taken a very dim view of fair use claims on unpublished material.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Irandemandintersectsproduction.jpg

Image:Irandemandintersectsproduction.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gerash77 (notify | contribs).

Flickr source states this graph is taken from a publication called Peak Oil Review. Kelly ^hi! 03:42, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:3_Mixed_boxing.JPG

Image:3_Mixed_boxing.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mazfired (notify | contribs).

Orphaned. Unencyclopedic. Low quality. Rettetast (talk) 12:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2_Mixed_boxing.JPG

Image:2_Mixed_boxing.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mazfired (notify | contribs).

Orphaned. Unencyclopedic. Low quality. Rettetast (talk) 12:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Furious_Mixed_boxing.JPG

Image:Furious_Mixed_boxing.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mazfired (notify | contribs).

Orphaned. Unencyclopedic. Low quality. Rettetast (talk) 12:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mixed_Boxing_2_.JPG

Image:Mixed_Boxing_2_.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mazfired (notify | contribs).

Orphaned. Unencyclopedic. Low quality. Rettetast (talk) 12:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Delete Appears for fail #8, certainly no sufficient argument has been made otherwise. WilyD 20:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jacques Delors public.jpg

Image:Jacques Delors public.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JLogan (notify | contribs).

The image might illustrate a significant moment in the history of Europe, but the image itself is not significant in the readers' understanding of the topics of the articles it is used in. The image fails WP:NFCC policy #8. Ilse @ 17:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the fair-use rationale clearly states that this is a significant moment in the history of the flag, not Europe as a whole. -

\mathrm {S}

\mathrm {Solberg}

\mathrm {J}

21:31, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Per nom. Per #8, this does not significantly increase readers' understanding. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:23, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Chronicus members 2008.jpg

Image:Chronicus members 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by RottenStrings (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic, only use is for now-deleted vanity band article, uploader has no other contributions and is likely vanished. Kinu ^t/_c 18:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chronicus-2008.jpg

Image:Chronicus-2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by RottenStrings (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic, only use is for now-deleted vanity band article, uploader has no other contributions and is likely vanished. Kinu ^t/_c 18:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kirito.jpg

Image:Kirito.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lord Camelot99 (notify | contribs).

It's been tagged with a "will be deleted in a week" message for WAY over a week. I don't know what to do here... ViperSnake151 22:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]