Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 June 2

< June 1	June 3 >

June 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete the two screenshots. Fair use images in infoboxes are merely decorative. Cited commentary about the image needs to exist in the article and the image placed in context with that commentary in order to justify using the image under fair use. -Nv8200p talk 20:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Last of the Time Lords.jpg

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 July 3.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 July 19.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

Image:Last of the Time Lords.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wolf of Fenric (notify | contribs).

Image fails wp:nfc #1, as it can (and is) easily described by text, #8 does not significantly contribute to the users understanding Fasach Nua (talk) 18:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, it clearly describes the emotions and setting of the episode. ╟─TreasuryTag (talk ╬ contribs)─╢ 19:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - It does, but isn't necessary for the performance of that function. See Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The (talk · contribs) below. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 17:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Image is rationaled to "illustrate a key element of the plot and key characters." It does, but the IDP does not explain how this image is necessary for this article; the article is duly understandable without the application of this copyrighted media. Seeing the "dying Master [...] cradled by the Doctor" is not necessary to understand the fact and information itself. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 19:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The test is not whether the article is "understandable" without the copyright media. Rather, the test is whether, with the copyright media, understanding of the topic of the article is improved. Television is a visual medium. Including a shot like this conveys all sorts of things about the episode that the bare text of the article cannot -- from the look and style of the Master character, to the intensity of the John Simm/David Tennant acting. A well-chosen image, like this one, adds a lot to the reader's overall feel for the episode -- which is part of what an article should be trying to convey. And it does so regardless of whether there's some banal caption at the level of "Look at Spot. Look at Spot run." For the reasons given above: the image is legal; it is of value to the article; and it is not replaceable by free content. So it should stay. Jheald (talk) 16:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Master dying is a key element, and the image displays the key antagonist of the episode; irreplacable with words. — Edokter • Talk • 20:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I find that user:Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The does an extremely good job of doing so below. What aspect of that description doesn't meet the purpose of this image? — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 17:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Key element of narrative and sets tone for episode and Dr.'s emotions. Another example of copyright paranoia... Mangwanani ^(talk) 15:10, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - according to the non-free content policy, fair use images should only be used if their presence would significantly increase readers' understanding. While this image may illustrate a plot element, in my opinion, it doesn't significantly increase the reader's understanding of the article. PhilKnight (talk) 19:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HORSE; no objection to the image being listed by another user. Sceptre ^(talk) 14:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Sorry Sceptre, you don't really expect that a closing admin is going to take this into account, do you? Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Comment - sorry, I don't see te argument there, Sceptre. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 20:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - if there is an image that demonstrates the material better, it certainly isn't this one. It could be a love scene for all we know. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 00:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As I've often said before, essentially all episode screenshots in infoboxes should go; the very fact that they are in an infobox is a strong indicator they are not being used to support the text as they should. If there's anything interesting this image is meant to convey, over and above the mere fact that a certain plot element happens, the text should at least name what that interesting something is, and the image should be structurally integrated with that part of the text. Encyclopedia articles must analyse, not just evoke. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As per TreasuryTag and Edoktor's explanations. --SoWhy ^Talk 21:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - What explanations? They are describing their own reactions to the episode, not the rather inadequate image offered to represent such. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 20:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A striking image of the Doctor's desperation to save the only other living Time Lord, whom he has known since childhood. The Tenth Doctor's extraordinary capacity for forgiveness towards The Master contrasts with his normally unforgiving, uncompromising nature ("No second chances, I'm that kind of man" -The Christmas Invasion, "You get one warning. That was it." -School Reunion). Despite all the evil things The Master has done, the Doctor forgives him and urges him to regenerate. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 17:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Excellent, that's the prose that takes the place of this image's necessity; and in fact does a better job than. (WP:NFCC#1 & #3a) — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 17:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I concur. I am not against an image inthe article; I think a better image would accomplish more. The image simply doesn't communicate all that you seem willing to ascribe to it. I still think it looks rather more like a love scene. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 20:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'd like to see you both describing in words the appearence and expression on the main antagonist's face without the image... you can't. That is why the image is essential, and omission would be detrimental. — Edokter • Talk • 21:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Are you arguing that the specific appearence and expression on the antagonist's face is necessary to the understand of the content of the article(s) in which it is used?
      While you're right in that such description is best left to images, the necessity of such description is unlikely. If it were, there would be a gout of copyrighted images used to illustrate every nuance of a character/actor's range of depiction. Similarly, I can't accurately describe every face these characters make throughout this episode, but being unable to do so without imagery doesn't mean that said imagery is necessary to understand the content of the article. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 21:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - Perhaps challenging us is not the proper approach, Edokter. I have already suggest that the image is the wrong one to use, if you are trying to communicate what you and others passionately describe, find an image that communicates that. I had suggested the funeral pyre, but that seems to have fallen on deaf ears. I for one am not against having images in the articles, but I am vehemently opposed to purely decorative pictures being added to provide any old image. The image has to communicate something more than just what the image shows. This one doesn't even come close, as I am not sure if the Master is dying, cracking a joke or passing gas. The smart money is on the last one, though. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 22:07, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move it out of the infobox to a location in the article where the non-original research, critical commentary resides. If there is no non-original research, critical commentary resides, then delete. JohnABerring27A (talk) 18:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Silence in the Library.jpg

Image:Silence in the Library.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mangwanani (notify | contribs).

This image is easily described using text wp:nfc#1, conveys little information wp:nfc#8, and is not the subject of critical commentary wp:nfc#8Fasach Nua (talk) 18:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The copyrighted image of the five astronauts and two civilians in an office/library does not provide further understanding of the plot of "Silence in the Library" than the prose can or does. This image is rationaled to "illustrate a key element of the episode and key characters." While it may, the IDP does not explain how or why this copyrighted image is necessary for this article. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 19:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it's a key plot element that also illustrates the overall feel and mood of the episode, both of which are important to one's understanding. ╟─TreasuryTag (talk ╬ contribs)─╢ 19:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - how, precisely does the image communicate that, TT? - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 18:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I feel this image does not convey a key element of the plot and characters are not recognizable. — Edokter • Talk • 19:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a key element of the narrative - the first death and ghosting experience - and should there be a query as to the rationale or caption this can be easily altered. I refer people to the other images in the Dr. Who series - some of which are FA status and have the relevant image. Mangwanani ^(talk) 15:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the image doesn't convey this scene particularly well. For example, the image doesn't clearly show the space suit is still intact, let alone help the reader understand what is meant by ghosting. Also, I don't understand what you mean by refer people to other images in the Dr. Who series, why is that an argument for keeping the image? PhilKnight (talk) 21:32, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per pd_THOR - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 07:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - don't see many suggestions on how to alterate. Far too much of a destructive mood here. As I said before, copyright paranoia out of hand... Mangwanani ^(talk) 19:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Suggest you find an image that would help a reader who hasn't seen the episode understand the article better. PhilKnight (talk) 21:32, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My point precisely. :) - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 22:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - according to the non-free content policy, fair use images should only be used if their presence would significantly increase readers' understanding. While this image may illustrate a plot element, in my opinion, it doesn't significantly increase the reader's understanding of the article. PhilKnight (talk) 19:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no justification for this. No relevant discussion of the image itself.--Troikoalogo (talk) 20:48, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As I've often said before, essentially all episode screenshots in infoboxes should go; the very fact that they are in an infobox is a strong indicator they are not being used to support the text as they should. If there's anything interesting this image is meant to convey, over and above the mere fact that a certain plot element happens, the text should at least name what that interesting something is, and the image should be structurally integrated with that part of the text. Encyclopedia articles must analyse, not just evoke. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Respectfully, I disagree. Walking into this discussion with the consideration that all episodic imagery should go the way of the dodo doesn't exactly render you neutral in the evaluation of single images, now does it? From what I understand of IfD, each image is weighed on its own merits. While I agree that this image is crap, having a presumption that all images are crap is like deciding that all apples are bad because some have brown spots. If you cannot be neutral, then perhaps you should take a pass on images in episodic articles.
- How does this comment tie in with your Delete !vote? You haven't made a single comment on the image in question itself. As for placement of the image; that is purely estethical. Where the image is placed should have no bearing on the validity of an image, as long as the connection is made clear. — Edokter • Talk • 14:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Of course, my argument presupposes the obvious fact that the connection is in fact not made clear. Which it isn't, for all I can see. That the image is also placed in an irrelevant position just goes to underline this fact. The text is not saying what it is that the image is supposed to demonstrate. (Merely noting what moment in the plot it is would be a start but not sufficient. It doesn't even do that though.) Of course, this finding for me may be caused by the overall poor quality of the writing. Like in many cases of Dr Who articles, the whole text is totally impenetrable to a reader who, like me, isn't already intimately familiar with the subject. Especially the plot section, is complete gibberish; as long as that's the case, there's no way on earth I could see a reasonable fair use case based on it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Ipodtouch.jpg

Image:Ipodtouch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ipodtoucher (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, UA, maybe Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 01:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ipoh_66.jpg

Image:Ipoh_66.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adiyon84 (notify | contribs).

~~Orphaned, Low quality~~ Nv8200p talk 01:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination withdrawn. Image linked to article. -Nv8200p talk 20:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ipoh_City_2.jpg

Image:Ipoh_City_2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adiyon84 (notify | contribs).

~~Orphaned, Low quality~~ Nv8200p talk 01:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- - - Nomination withdrawn. Image linked to article. -Nv8200p talk 20:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Iralco_Collinstown.jpg

Image:Iralco_Collinstown.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gavigan_01 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Iran_Ajr.jpg

Image:Iran_Ajr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by D_foli (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Irfan_Khan2.JPG

Image:Irfan_Khan2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gerlaquarius (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AllisonCroweLittleLightalbumcover.jpg

Image:AllisonCroweLittleLightalbumcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adrian22 (notify | contribs).

CC license is most likely spurious as it's unlikely an album cover would be released this way. Also, claims on image page not substantiated through OTRS SkierRMH (talk) 01:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Has someone contacted the email on the page, as requested, before posting this deletion request? The Evil Spartan (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I have sent an email; I respect a response, which I may forward to OTRS. The Evil Spartan (talk) 19:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - email confirmation received. As the record company appears to be Allison Crowe Music, this is a valid license. The Evil Spartan (talk) 00:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Still liable for deletion until OTRS ticket number is added to image as per COPYREQ. MilborneOne (talk) 12:58, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually it's already been added on the image on commons, so just go ahead and delete it under I8. The Evil Spartan (talk) 06:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Commons image showing through. -Nv8200p talk 20:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the ins and outs of what's being said here, but, I can confirm 100% that all is ok with this image - we DO release Allison Crowe's music, album art and more under CC and other free licenses. I believe Evil Spartan has kindly confirmed this is the case. Should there ever be questions about Allison Crowe-related content, please do not hesitate to write me c/o management@allisoncrowe.com or phone 250-537-1286. Thanks! Adrian (Allison Crowe Music) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrian22 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Isarda.jpg

Image:Isarda.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Devraj_Singh (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 03:14, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ishim_river_in_Astana.jpg

Image:Ishim_river_in_Astana.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Attila_kz (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:16, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ishues.jpg

Image:Ishues.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Uzuri (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Island_of_Bimini.jpg

Image:Island_of_Bimini.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Asdfaeou36 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low resolution Nv8200p talk 03:21, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IsolaInTheRain.JPG

Image:IsolaInTheRain.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fordzii (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Istanbulbarokcd1.jpg

Image:Istanbulbarokcd1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TRWebmaster (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Leylapınar.gif

Image:Leylapınar.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TRWebmaster (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Absent uploader, Looks like a pro head shot Nv8200p talk 03:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Istanbulbarokcd2.jpg

Image:Istanbulbarokcd2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TRWebmaster (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Istanbulbarokcd3.jpg

Image:Istanbulbarokcd3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TRWebmaster (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Istanbulbarokcd4.jpg

Image:Istanbulbarokcd4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TRWebmaster (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Istanbulbarokcd6.jpg

Image:Istanbulbarokcd6.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TRWebmaster (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ister-red-poster_copy.jpg

Image:Ister-red-poster_copy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DanielRoss (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Italian_peninsula_no_borders.png

Image:Italian_peninsula_no_borders.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Contributor175 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low Resolution , Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Itemis-Logo.jpg

Image:Itemis-Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jfwagener (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ithikasam.jpg

Image:Ithikasam.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kgys (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Itst_xbox360.jpg

Image:Itst_xbox360.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SlicerITST (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Iwthswvn.JPG

Image:Iwthswvn.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sliat_1981 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 03:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Iyogi-logo.gif

Image:Iyogi-logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Deepakbisht1 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Izb_logo_by_rotto.png

Image:Izb_logo_by_rotto.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Byung-Hee (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Free image. No consensus to delete. -Nv8200p talk 20:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Human head.JPG

Image:Human head.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Amiruci (notify | contribs).

~~Unused image,~~ poor quality. Adds no encyclopedic value to the article (Head) ~~that it had been in previously.~~ --Icarus ^(Hi!) 04:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There are images which do a better job than this on the said article page... Mangwanani ^(talk) 17:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This is a perfect example of a head... what is the issue here?
Keep: There is no picture of a human head in this article except for the discussed image. There are only drawings of the said human body part. This image clearly depicts a typical human head. Amiruci 07:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Deleting an image is different from removing it from an article because it adds no encyclopedic value to the article (Head). It's a human head and seems limited to that feature. The one used in the head article is not a featured picture. If you want to switch it out from the article, take a head from Wikipedia:Featured_pictures#People or some other featured picture. You can crop featured pitures to focus on the head, if need be. Until a better photo is used in its place, it should stay in the article. JohnABerring27A (talk) 17:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Faithless_Melkweg.jpg and Image:Faithless Alexandra.jpg

Image:Faithless_Melkweg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chappy84 (notify | contribs).

Don't meaningfully add to the reader's understanding of the article. PhilKnight (talk) 09:55, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Both images are used in a discography without any critical commentary per Wikipedia:Non-free content. Aspects (talk) 22:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Both images are used in a discography. JohnABerring27A (talk) 18:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no source, not really free. Damiens.rf 15:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
image was originally released for promotional purposes by the now defunct/divested company KPNQwest. Copyright holder is no longer in existence, copyright has also not been transferred, image has remained in public domain. Original copyright notice had been appended to the image with an explanation. Kathmann 00:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the demise of a copyright-holding company can be presumed to place its copyrights into the public domain--that would be a very novel legal doctrine. Moreover the original photographer and his descendants hold the original copyright and his assignment to the company (if he did so assign) would not remove his right to be identified as the author, nor could it be interpreted as granting a right to anyone other than the original company to copy the work. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 23:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mba.jpg

Image:Mba.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marcmba (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, absent uploader, image on commons actually useful. Biruitorul ^Talk 17:46, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete useless. I want the picture of Leon Mba without having to make a duplicate (which I did, but it got deleted). I'm an Editor of the wiki^{[citation needed]} 18:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image on Commons showing through. -Nv8200p talk 20:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Novgorod Oblast Flag.gif

Image:Novgorod Oblast Flag.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bart l (notify | contribs).

This is the flag of Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, not that of Novgorod Oblast. A flag on Nizhny Novgorod Oblast is available in svg format, making this image redundant. —Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Viewer.png

Image:Viewer.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by benbac20 (notify | contribs).

Renaming filename, Image:Viewer.png obsoleted by Image:Jrdesktop-xp-linux.png Benbac20 (talk) 19:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wired_Connection_Ubuntu.PDF.pdf

Image:Wired_Connection_Ubuntu.PDF.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pchelponline (notify | contribs).

Not used, not ensyclopedic, also says it may not be altered without permission in the document, in wich case it's also not free licensed. Sherool (talk) 20:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, absurd license, unencyclopedic and unusable. ╟─TreasuryTag (talk ╬ contribs)─╢ 20:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Zero_Real_Yield.pdf

Image:Zero_Real_Yield.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Keith1952 (notify | contribs).

Not used, not particularly usefull without the source data and not the best format for this. Sherool (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Win_whitepaper_v6.pdf

Image:Win_whitepaper_v6.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Winsper (notify | contribs).

Not used, not ensyclopedic, original research/ copyvio (says "© 2007, Winsper, Inc. Reproduction Prohibited") in the document footer. Sherool (talk) 20:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:What_is_an_Outdoor_Fitness_Boot_Camp.pdf

Image:What_is_an_Outdoor_Fitness_Boot_Camp.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SaritaShoemaker (notify | contribs).

Not used, not ensyclopedic (advertisment). Sherool (talk) 20:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:J3_ThreeJsLogoBestonblackborder.jpg

Image:J3_ThreeJsLogoBestonblackborder.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jjones232 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:16, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JAN1705_025_edited.JPG

Image:JAN1705_025_edited.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sean90 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JANEEN-upside.JPG

Image:JANEEN-upside.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Castglass (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Possible Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 21:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JASON_TYPING_IN_OREGON.jpg

Image:JASON_TYPING_IN_OREGON.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jmthornberry (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JB-2007portrett.jpg

Image:JB-2007portrett.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jobe2007 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JBBC_logo_print.jpg

Image:JBBC_logo_print.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Anoutsos (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JBUF.jpg

Image:JBUF.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JBUF (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]