Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 July 21

< July 20	July 22 >

July 21

Image:Chunkysalsa.jpg

Image:Chunkysalsa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chunkysalsa (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic - The image doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia. Only contribution by user, logo appears to be for a personal blog, and that doesn't have its own article. Optigan13 (talk) 01:27, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic, low res. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep since we can't do anything here anyway. howcheng {chat} 18:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Infineon_Raceway.gif

This image needs to be deleted. The Infineon Raceway article has two .svg images. This image is obsolete and old. 209.2.60.98 (talk) 18:49, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong venue As I already stated at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2008 July 16, this is a Commons image and en.wikipedia cannot delete this image. Furthermore, the image shows a slightly different route than the ones depicted. — BQZip01 — ^talk 01:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Battle_of_the_Boyne_11_July,_1690.gif

Image:Battle_of_the_Boyne_11_July,_1690.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Raymond_Palmer (notify | contribs).

An orphaned bad GIF version of Commons versoin. O sama K 18:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 01:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Apoc2400 (talk) 12:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. No consensus to delete. -Nv8200p talk 02:40, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Burgbaconpizza.jpg

Image:Burgbaconpizza.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Roboscreech (notify | contribs).

Unecyclopedic Jaxal1 (talk) 19:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Unless you can tell me why it isn't encyclopedic (I mean, some are just obvious). This one appears to be an example of just what it purports. — BQZip01 — ^talk 01:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Extremely non-standard toppings, misleading and confusing, therefore unencyclopedic. -Malkinann (talk) 04:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but should we only show "standard" toppings? How is it misleading? How is it confusing? — BQZip01 — ^talk 21:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - An interesting picture of non-standard pizza and I see nothing wrong or unencylopdic about it. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 16:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I like this picture. It shows how diverse pizza can be. Drunkboxer (talk) 23:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No reason to delete. Discuss its use on the pizza talk page instead. --Apoc2400 (talk) 11:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.