Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 January 24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 24

[edit]
Image:Randy-Moss.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Suran37 | contribs).
Image:Mac-Pro-2006-2008.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Not | contribs).
Image:Knightlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by El Greco | contribs).
I still don't see how the image I uploaded was distorted? El Greco(talk) 16:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, this is weird. And I know I'm not the only one seeing this because on Knight Rider page Collectonian tried to fix the image too. Check this out: here. After you changed the image the top picture is what I saw. I think it was a glitch in Wikipedia or something, but I thought it was a cashe problem with my browser. I purged that and it was still showing up funky. I clicked and dragged the image to my desktop to download it and it appeared as the bottom picture - the wide one (like it was originally in the article). I changed it to a png file and re-uploaded it and it fixed the problem. Now, with my other computer, I checked out your image and I can see it is the middle image and you're right it looks fine. So I don't know what the hell is going on. Maybe some technical genius can enlighten us. Cyberia23 (talk) 21:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That is very interesting. Is this the only image its done it to? El Greco(talk) 16:02, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Daimler super 8.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hektor | contribs).
delete- blatant WP:NFC#1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fasach Nua (talkcontribs) 12:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Mermancharles.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Theturdreich12 | contribs).
Image:Pillockk.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Theturdreich12 | contribs).
Image:Charlesmermann.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Theturdreich12 | contribs).
Image:Mermancharles (Small).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Theturdreich12 | contribs).
Image:Fashion_designer_Valentino.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fuzzybuddy | contribs).
Image:HereticsofDune.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stupidnut | contribs).
Image:DuneMessiah(NEL).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gardener_of_Geda | contribs).
Image:Dune.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stupidnut | contribs).
Image:Sgt._York_Memorial.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Carptrash | contribs).
I'd already pulled this one, but you'd better get over to Daniel Chester French and weave your magic. After that Augustus Saint-Gaudens and then I'll give you more. And then you'll ask you law prof about it and he'll say, "Well it's not a clear cut thing, some consider photographs to be works of art in themselves, and subject is not really an issue."" Or not. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 01:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Um, no law prof would say that. This is clearly a derivative work and non-free. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:DivineChild-Parducci.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Carptrash | contribs).
It is hard to not call you at least . . . ... slow. Sculpture on buildings is not copyrighted, but this one is gone too. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 01:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not true. As long as there is "conceptual separability" between a copyrighted work and a functional work (which there clearly is between a sculpture and a wall), then it can be copyrighted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean, "Then it is automaticaly copyrighted" ? As opposed to "can be" which suggests . . .... all sorts of things. Carptrash (talk) 04:32, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:British_Justice_2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Carptrash | contribs).
Image:EWShahrazadUse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Carptrash | contribs).
When my pictures appear here, or in any of the similar places where this stuff goes on, I now just delete them and any others of mine that are nearby. I could come up with a date but, dies it matter? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 00:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It does matter, because if it was pre-1923, then the painting would no longer be copyrighted and this picture would be a free image. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Kiva-banner-small.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sushi Tax | contribs).
Image:MaineRoute109.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Newhampshire | contribs).
Image:Espace Musique Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MapleLeafFan04 | contribs).
Image:Madlaxwhitedress.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by User:OgasawaraSachiko | contribs).