Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 May 7
Appearance
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 May 7)
May 7
[edit]- Unencyclopedic, Orphan and Copyright Violation — Knulclunk 01:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. All that, and horribly disrespectful to boot. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Actually forget it. I'm going to take fast action and speedily delete this. Portraying a woman crying over a dead body, and replacing the dead body with a spilled coffee cup violates Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons in my book. It's offensive at least to her, if not to basically everyone who participated or even hear of Kent State shootings. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- ZeWrestler (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- I'm not sure if the explanation for the ineligibility for copyright of the phishing e-mail is a joking one but if it isn't then it's wrong. Spammers are human just like all of us. It's highly unlikely, however, for a phisher to claim copyright over such an e-mail. Any phisher who would do this would basically admit to breaking the law so it is unlikely. Maybe we can have something similar to the pictures of Abu Ghraib or in a similar way to how we allow graffiti to be uploaded on commons. If not, this needs to be deleted or at the very least changed to a fair use tag. Yonatan talk 23:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Um... it says on the bottom, "Image created personally by me from the HTML souce of an actual paypal spoof e-mail. NO chrome or any other part of any application is present from any client software, therefore this is NOT a screenshot. Additions such as the simulated chrome indicating From and Subject, and the note indicating the actual URL were simulated by me. As for the content of the e-mail itself, it was generated by spammers, which, as non-humans, are ineligible for copyright protection under international laws." and there is a Public domain tag on the bottom
- As it contains within the trademarked paypal logo, this cannot be pd. Retag as fair-use; don't delete. AmiDaniel (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- I have no problem with it being retagged as fair use. It should be kept in the system though. --ZeWrestler Talk 05:34, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Did you actually create the original phishing e-mail? Obviously not, therefore, unless you significantly change the text (ie. completely rewrote it) the copyrights belong to the phisher who created the e-mail, or alternatively to PayPal. Either way, you are not the copyright holder. I have no problem with it being tagged as fair use but you need to remember that you can only use so many pictures on phishing under the pretense of fair use. Yonatan talk 21:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Anyaanomaly (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic value Iamunknown 00:32, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Anyaanomaly (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, I can find no external reference that uses this flag so it appears to be original research and, in any case, Image:Gay flag.svg is currently in wide usage so this flag is somewhat unnecessary. Iamunknown 00:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hiphopinformant (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:07, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Gurukuntapraveen (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Susanpallister (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Susanpallister (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Susanpallister (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Susanpallister (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Celtic0106 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic graphic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I hate to say "per nom," but that is exactly what fits here. Nom covers it. Especially "unencyclopedic." -- Ben 02:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- CompIsMyRx (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Eff.gif - obsoleted by EFF.svg — CompotatoJ 01:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:17, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Peter lowe (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:17, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Peter lowe (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:18, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Peter lowe (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Peter lowe (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Peter lowe (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Will Banjo01 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Janay smith (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Janay smith (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, likely not GFDL licensed given information states sony music japan User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:25, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Goyanks193 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:25, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Don'tVoteIt'sYourConstitutionalRight (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic graphic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Trueplayer (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, question PD-self license User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:28, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Grendel013 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic animated gif User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Grendel013 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic animated gif User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Grendel013 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic animated gif User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Grendel013 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic animated gif User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image in pdf form, image should be tagged as non-free magazine cover User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image in pdf form, image should be tagged as non-free magazine cover - very large 6.4meg User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image in pdf form, image should be tagged as non-free magazine cover, very large at 6.6meg User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, image should be tagged as non-free magazine cover User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, image should be tagged as non-free magazine cover User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- JDougherty (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Commons showing through. ~ BigrTex 03:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Plessthanpointohfive (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, questionalbe license User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Plessthanpointohfive (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, questionalbe license User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Plessthanpointohfive (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, questionalbe license User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Gigocuevas (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, questions have been raised about the licensing for this image User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Gigocuevas (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, quesitons have been raised about the licensing of this image User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Terdfergusson (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, I question the licensing as PD-self and should be a non-free logo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Terdfergusson (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unsure of any encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Derekberger (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Cellulararrest (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kumarrajendran (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Davidpollack (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- NTH designlab (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, likely mistagged and should be non-free logo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Erroneous for various reasons. See Talk:Bitboard#Illustration is misleading! and User talk:Miko3k#Chess bitboard image. -- Dissident (Talk) 02:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Error isn't a reason to delete, rather to edit and improve. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- It isn't just a derivative work of "wordbaloon" as it claims, it includes the classic logo of Marvel Comics, wich is of course protected by copyright. The image is used for a template, not for an article, so fair use can not be called — Perón 02:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, copyvio. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 05:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 06:04, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Profet 666 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is an orphaned image constantly in danger of image abuse Profet 666 06:04, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Jonathan Burgess (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, article deleted in AFD Coredesat 06:39, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- NIghtorius (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible Copyright violation, article this was used in was deleted in AFD Coredesat 07:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Coredesat 07:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Alexandrab (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Uploaded by spam account Alexandrab (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), unused MER-C 11:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Alexandrab (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Uploaded by spam account Alexandrab (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), unused MER-C 11:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kogsquinge (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- cbs.com is not a source for promo material. Their images are produced to enhance their site, not others. By copying their content, we replace the original market role for their content. Abu badali (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
* Keep. Their content is a tv series, not this limited resolution photo of a character. Fair use. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- The tv series and this image are two independently copyrighted works. This image is a posed photograph produced to increase the value of cbs.com's website. --Abu badali (talk) 20:55, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- You may be right; they do seem to send out this stuff in fan packages. Withdrawing opinion. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- STRONG KEEP. There is no reason why this image should be deleted. Our use of the image does not limit CBS in any way (ie. it will not affect the amount of people who visit CBS.com). Besides, the same images are used a lot on other sites (soaps.com; soapcentral.com; etc). Kogsquinge 21:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Contest. I have to disagree. If the most we copy content from cbs.com, the less useful the site becomes. Our copying does potentially affect the number of people that visit CBS.com. About other sites using their images, either these sites received "prior written permission" (as explained in Terms of Use) or are simply copyright violators. --Abu badali (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- STRONG KEEP. There is no reason why this image should be deleted. Our use of the image does not limit CBS in any way (ie. it will not affect the amount of people who visit CBS.com). Besides, the same images are used a lot on other sites (soaps.com; soapcentral.com; etc). Kogsquinge 21:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kogsquinge (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- cbs.com is not a source for promo material. Their images are produced to enhance their site, not others. By copying their content, we replace the original market role for their content. Abu badali (talk) 11:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
* Keep. Fair use to depict the character; the content is a tv series, not a limited resolution still. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- The tv series and this image are two independently copyrighted works. This image is a posed photograph produced to increase the value of cbs.com's website. --Abu badali (talk) 20:55, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- You may be right; they do seem to send out this stuff in fan packages. Withdrawing opinion. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- STRONG KEEP. There is no reason why this image should be deleted. Our use of the image does not limit CBS in any way (ie. it will not affect the amount of people who visit CBS.com). Besides, the same images are used a lot on other sites (soaps.com; soapcentral.com; etc). Kogsquinge 21:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, possibly derivative of the famous copyrighted Iwa Jima photo BigDT 12:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Rofflkoptr (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 12:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 12:10, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Duchossois (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, somebody's logo BigDT 12:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- FrummerThanThou (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 12:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 12:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 12:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yasirfaheem (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 12:18, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 12:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Andrealfenech (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 12:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- It was uploaded as a test.
--Andrew t c 13:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- unnecessary, non-notable unfree image of a magazine's cover being used to illustrate the person depicted on the cover Abu badali (talk) 13:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Not quite; it's used to illustrate the appearance of that person on that cover; that's an important part of that person's claim to notability. Could be lower resolution. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Question Sara Jean Underwood discusses her appearing on this cover in some detail as a notable event in her life. If it had a rationale, I would interpret it as meeting all 10 points of the Fair Use policy. Can you elaborate on why you don't feel that it does? ~ BigrTex 17:22, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- The article doesn't "discusses" the cover image. It simply describes it: "She appeared on the cover of the October 2005 issue holding a football with nothing but bodypaint on her to simulate her wearing a jersey similar in design to the ones worn by the OSU Beavers football team with matching bikini briefs". This is hardly critical commentary or a notability claim. Accurate detailed descriptions of non-notable unfree covers are usually not enough to justify it's use (see this previous ifd, for instance). The image seems to be used solely as a living person illustration. Notable images have reliable sources discussing them at some length . This is not the case here. --Abu badali (talk) 18:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Qualhiveldorf (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- obsoleted by Image:Super heavy elements.svg — ~a (user • talk • contribs) 13:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- SteveHopson (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary, non-notable unfree image of a magazine's cover used to illustrate the person depicted on the cover Abu badali (talk) 13:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedoflight (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- non-notable unfree image of a magazine cover Abu badali (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- SteveHopson (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- non-notable unfree image of a magazine's cover Abu badali (talk) 14:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- non-notable unfree image of a magazine's cover . Abu badali (talk) 14:02, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - This cover is in fact notable because it essentially launched Rita's major movie career. Studio executives at Fox saw her magazine photos in Life and signed her. [1] It is also significant that a Hispanic actress was on a national magazine cover in the 1950s. - AKeen 14:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- You're claiming notability on the magazine issue, not it's (unfree) cover image. We don't use unfree magazine cover images everytime a magazine issue is mentioned. That would be a decorative use. The image itself must be notable. That said, I'm not fully convinced that Lifetimetv.com's is a reliable source to state the importance and influence of a given Life magazine image or cover. But that is irrelevant at this point. --Abu badali (talk) 19:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: for further comment on the significance of this particular cover see Frances Negrón-Muntaner's book Boricua Pop: Puerto Ricans and American Culture from West Side Story to Jennifer Lopez - Page 79 (ISBN 0814758185). - AKeen 19:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- non-notable unfree image of a magazine's cover is only mentioned in a rather pov and original research statement in the article Abu badali (talk) 14:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- keep it is used as an illustration of how the subject was trying to shed her innocent child actress reputation. Also, I did not add the alleged POV/OR language, but it accurately describes the contrast between her previous image and the one she was trying to attain. --rogerd 03:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - The POV-ness in the caption in the article have been removed, so that is no longer an issue. This particular cover is significant because it encapsulates a new stage in O'Brien's career and gained her a certain amount of notoriety - AKeen 14:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- This is a statement that must be sourced to avoid original research. Do you believe it can be done? --Abu badali (talk) 14:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- DanielNuyu (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- non-notable unfree image of a magazine's cover. Abu badali (talk) 14:17, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Notable: prominently mentioned in our The Old Man and the Sea article. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:10, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- The article The Old Man and the Sea is about a novella that was (according to the article) first published in a given issue of Time Magazine. No notability claim for the cover image. The cover image has not won any award, caused any controversy or otherwise been discussed by any source. We don't use cover images every time a magazine issue is mentioned. --Abu badali (talk) 20:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic Orphaned BigrTex 14:18, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Jaldridge86 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- unfree image of a person for which there are free alternatives available. source info is also incomplete/wrong Abu badali (talk) 14:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- SteveHopson (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- unnecessary non-notable unfree image of a mazine's cover. the magazine issue existence is mentioned in the article, but the line itself doesn't seem to add nothing noteworthy. Abu badali (talk) 14:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- nnecessary non-notable unfree image of a mazine's cover. the magazine issue existence is mentioned in the article, but the line itself doesn't seem to add nothing noteworthy. image is being used to illustrate the person depicted Abu badali (talk) 14:32, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Not so,- this image is highly notable because: It shows Pamela Churchill plus her newborn son, Winston Churchill Jr - certainly something that contributed to her fame (she had later other accomplishments), and ,also noteworthy, she was an object for Cecil Beaton, and it was made shortly after giving birth. This is all discussed in the article, and if necessary, can be expanded. There is no replacement for that picture nor any better image to define her.Ekem 01:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- You say this image is "certainly something that contributed to her fame". Has that been discussed by reliable sources or is just your original research? Wikipedia can't be the first to assert some image's notability. If it's notable, someone wrote about it before us. Is it the case for this image? --Abu badali (talk) 01:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- The specific photosession and its significance are at length discussed in Reflected Glory:the Life of Pamela Churchill Harriman, Sally Bedel Smith, 1996. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-684-80950-8. The fact that this is the first LIFE cover with mother-baby content is noteworthy, too. Ekem 14:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- This discussion about the cover's significance, if found to be relevant to her bio, should be added to the article (and properly sourced). In this case, we would be using a notable image in an article's section about the image itself (and it's significance). As the article currently reads, the image is serving no purpose (other than to show how Pamela Harriman looked like). As I haven't had the opportunity to read the book you mentioned, I currently don't have an opinion on the relevance to the book's discussion to her bio. --Abu badali (talk) 15:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Pedrothelion30 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Uploader's only contribution, Unencyclopedic BigrTex 14:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree image of a mazine's cover. It's used to illustrate the bio on the person pictured and as one of the 15 images on Life (magazine). Abu badali (talk) 14:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Nothing is neccessary. This image is doubly useful in the bio both as an image of the person shown, and as the magazine cover is specifically refered to in the text. It is indeed one of several in the article on Time magazine, but that is no valid reason for its deletion. Is it only this one you propose to delete, and why only this one? Aodhdubh 16:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree image of a mazine's cover. Not even mentioned in the article Abu badali (talk) 14:39, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- No evidence the copyright holder released all rights as claimed. source site says "All Rights Reserved" Abu badali (talk) 14:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Agree. Looked around, even found this: Copyright on material published and distributed by NCSL is held exclusively by NCSL unless specifically noted otherwise. Use of NCSL materials falls under normal copyright law. Easily reproducible by anyone who happens to walk in front of the building. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic Orphaned, only contribution by uploader BigrTex 15:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Secretlaboratory (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Has neither source, copyright information or licensing information; listed from April 27 with no response — JodyB talk 15:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, no context to establish encyclopedic usefulness BigrTex 15:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, no context to establish encyclopedic usefulness, BigrTex 15:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- web source, no copyright, no license — JodyB talk 15:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, apparently uploaded for use on Math Agent 132 (prodded deletion) BigrTex 15:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, superseded by Image:I-blank wide.svg. — TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 15:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- ArkansasTraveler (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Superseded by Image:Arkansas blank.svg. — TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 15:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, superseded by Image:Old Arizona Loop 202.svg. — TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 16:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, only contribution by uploader, no indication that Nicole isn't Unencyclopedic BigrTex 16:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Obsolete (Image:Structure PBT.JPG) BigrTex 17:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- DemanFlash (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic Orphaned (apparently uploaded for speedied B'Daman Empire) BigrTex 17:25, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned logo, likely Copyright violation BigrTex 17:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, only contribution by uploader, uploaded for self-titled article BigrTex 17:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, likely uploaded for self-titled article which uploader blanked when moved to userspace BigrTex 17:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, likely uploaded for self-titled article which was blanked by uploader after being moved to userspace BigrTex 17:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kevinjapan (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, no context to establish Encyclopedic value BigrTex 17:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Gbambino06 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- No evidence that the copyright holder "irrevocably released all rights" for this image. If some evidence is give, I will withdraw the nomination Abu badali (talk) 20:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- What evidence would you like? --G2bambino 15:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- What evidence can you provide? There is some information at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. From the image description, it is not clear how you know that copyright has been released. ~ BigrTex 17:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Dreamingofdakar (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Absent uploader (only contribution), unclear encyclopedic value BigrTex 22:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Obsolete (Image:IMGHollyfortA 4608w.jpg) BigrTex 22:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Obsolete (Image:Tharparkar1 Pakistan.jpg) BigrTex 22:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Low quality Orphaned BigrTex 22:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned logo, Absent uploader (only contribution) BigrTex 22:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- SmilerNuts (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Unencyclopedic BigrTex 22:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- SmilerNuts (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Unencyclopedic BigrTex 22:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader (only contribution), Unencyclopedic (uploaded for use on self titled Ed putney, speedied in December as nn) BigrTex 22:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- CV - appears at the school district's webpage, with copyright notice visible beneath it. Many, many students attend that high school so a free alternative should be easily available.