Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 April 27

< April 25	April 28 >

April 27

Image:Image_name.ext

Copyright violation — Verne Andru 00:52, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

deleted by HighInBC. YechielMan 21:39, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CaptainCannabis.jpg

Copyright violation — Verne Andru 00:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Cody_vinson_face.jpg

Image:Cody_vinson_face.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Skurmit (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, user's only other three contributions were three uploads which have now been speedied BigDT 02:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Matt_White_Profile.pdf

Image:Matt_White_Profile.pdf (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Potter79 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, biography of someone who apparantly does not have an article BigDT 03:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jordan_Wade.jpg

Image:Jordan_Wade.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Awaken!nekawA (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 03:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Highly unlikely to be a user-created image BigDT 04:54, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:National_Team_1975.jpg

Image:National_Team_1975.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jaw101ie (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, questionable licensing BigDT 04:55, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Libyan_National_Flag.JPG

Image:Libyan_National_Flag.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jaw101ie (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, replaced by Image:Flag of Libya.svg BigDT 04:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tripoli_Airport_Landing_Chart.jpg

Image:Tripoli_Airport_Landing_Chart.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jaw101ie (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, tagged as GFDL, but description says "Courtesy of the Civil Aviation and Meteorology Bureau." BigDT 04:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jensrobot.jpg

Image:Jensrobot.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jensrobot (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Core desat 07:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Illep003.jpg

Image:Illep003.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jensrobot (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, article deleted in AFD Core desat 07:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ill005.jpg

Image:Ill005.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jensrobot (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, article deleted in AFD Core desat 07:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Illep009.jpg

Image:Illep009.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jensrobot (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, article deleted in AFD Core desat 07:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Illep012.jpg

Image:Illep012.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jensrobot (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, article deleted in AFD Core desat 07:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ThomaslengyelGWOC.jpg

Image:ThomaslengyelGWOC.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Thedoubter85 (notify | contribs).

Unused image of person whose article was deleted as non-notable; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas lengyel. — EALacey 11:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MikeH.jpg

Unencylopedic, no copyright tag, low quality, orphaned.- —Scott5114 ↗ 17:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MikeS.jpg

Unencylopedic, no copyright tag, low quality, orphaned.- —Scott5114 ↗ 17:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HansW.jpg

Unencylopedic, no copyright tag, low quality, orphaned.- —Scott5114 ↗ 17:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:9101_cover.jpg

Image:9101_cover.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Fool156 (notify | contribs).

Non-notable unfree image of a magazine cover being used to illustrate the person depicted on the cover. The article fully describes the image, but this doesn't seem to qualify as critical commentary Abu badali ^(talk) 21:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cartert_man.jpg

Image:Cartert_man.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Muntuwandi (notify | contribs).

unfree schreenshot used only on Talk: namespace Abu badali ^(talk) 21:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CreekPromoHolmesJackson.JPG

Image:CreekPromoHolmesJackson.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by AriGold (notify | contribs).

unfree image not used in the Main namespace Abu badali ^(talk) 21:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LDTonSI.jpg

Image:LDTonSI.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Zorro37 (notify | contribs).

unnecessary non-notable unfree image of a magazine cover Abu badali ^(talk) 21:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JohnEnos.jpg and Image:MStaffordPhyllis.jpg

Image:JohnEnos.jpg ([//wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=File:JohnEnos.jpg&action=delete

Image:MStaffordPhyllis.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).

Claimed to be promotional, but source site's terms of use expressely forbid such usage. Also, our usage (regardless of how we tag the image) replaces the original market value for this picture (that is, to illustrate a webpage about a fictional character). Abu badali ^(talk) 21:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why the CBS images should be deleted. A lot of Wikipedia images come from sites such as CBS. These images are better than screenshots because they better illustrate the characters' personality, etc. Plus, many of the CBS images appear on various other sites as well. As long as they are clearly sourced and there is a fair use rationale and copyright information, there is no reason why they cannot be used on Wikipedia. Kogsquinge 00:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MIkeRatledgeBBCPromo-1.jpg

Image:MIkeRatledgeBBCPromo-1.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Tvccs (notify | contribs).

unfree image of a living person Abu badali ^(talk) 21:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Btvs-buffy2.jpg

Image:Btvs-buffy2.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Redsignal (notify | contribs).

Images from "The WB Television Network", according to wbtv.com's terms of use, are not promotional at all. These images are produce to enhance the copyright holder's website, and our use is competitive. Abu badali ^(talk) 21:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Erotic_electrostimulation.jpg

Image:Erotic_electrostimulation.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Dlloyd (notify | contribs).

Orphaned and unused non-free image, uploaded pre 2005-05-19 Iamunknown 21:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Basaveshvara.jpg

Image:Basaveshvara.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Ashwatham (notify | contribs).

No source information available. Looks like a scan from a amagazine. — Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 21:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Image:HeinleVictoria.jpg

Image:HeinleVictoria.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).

cbs.com is not a source for promo material. Our use replaces the market role for this image (illustrate a webpage about a fictional character) Abu badali ^(talk) 21:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why the CBS images should be deleted. A lot of Wikipedia images come from sites such as CBS. These images are better than screenshots because they better illustrate the characters' personality, etc. Plus, many of the CBS images appear on various other sites as well. As long as they are clearly sourced and there is a fair use rationale and copyright information, there is no reason why they cannot be used on Wikipedia. Kogsquinge 00:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CKhalilLily.jpg

Image:CKhalilLily.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).

cbs.com is not a source for promo material. Our use replaces the market role for this image (illustrate a webpage about a fictional character) Abu badali ^(talk) 22:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why the CBS images should be deleted. A lot of Wikipedia images come from sites such as CBS. These images are better than screenshots because they better illustrate the characters' personality, etc. Plus, many of the CBS images appear on various other sites as well. As long as they are clearly sourced and there is a fair use rationale and copyright information, there is no reason why they cannot be used on Wikipedia. Kogsquinge 00:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BrytonM.jpg

Image:BrytonM.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).

cbs.com is not a source for promo material. Our use replaces the market role for this image (illustrate a webpage about a fictional character) Abu badali ^(talk) 22:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why the CBS images should be deleted. A lot of Wikipedia images come from sites such as CBS. These images are better than screenshots because they better illustrate the characters' personality, etc. Plus, many of the CBS images appear on various other sites as well. As long as they are clearly sourced and there is a fair use rationale and copyright information, there is no reason why they cannot be used on Wikipedia. Kogsquinge 00:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HomaDarabi.jpg

Image:HomaDarabi.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by ParthianShot (notify | contribs).

This image is uploaded from an unreliable propaganda website. It claims the following story:"This picture was sent to Dr. Homa Darabi from a woman in Iran.This picture was taken 20 days after she was lashed fifty times for being present at a family gathering where men other than her father and brother were present. Her crime? She is a single woman. It is forbidden for women to be present under the same roof with men other than their close relatives (father, brother and son) without proper hijab."- This image is not useful in wikipedia as it comes from a non-reliable blog with certain motivations. Further, the copyright status of the image is not established. — Aminz 22:01, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with 50 lashes--Kirby♥time 18:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The website is in possession of the picture ~~and granted full permission to use the image as the image description says.~~ --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 21:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Where is the license indicated on the website? --Iamunknown 21:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sorry - I edited my comment above. The uploader said he has contacted the website. Hopefully they will respond in time. If a license cannot be found in time, I agree the image should be deleted.--Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 23:02, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - This is a random blog. This picture can be very well made up. --Aminz 00:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - This is not a blog. Is Wikipedia a blog too? --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 01:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Wikipedia is not a reliable source.--Kirby♥time 22:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - The permission is being granted by Homa Darabi Foundation the image to be published under GFDL. I am able to provide admins with a copy of their email regarding the above. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 08:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The image is downloaded from an unreliable propaganda website. There is no reason to believe the image is not a forgery. It is of no use for any article in wikipedia even if you can establish its copyright status. --Aminz 08:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Nah. Its not a forgery. Thats not a reason for a deletion anyway. What reason do you have to believe that its a forgery? --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 18:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a copy of their reply to my request: ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 17:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep pending copyright permission, and with the current heading rather than the stuff about "Her crime? She is a single woman. It is forbidden for women to be present under the same roof with men other than their close relatives (father, brother and son) without proper hijab." Hudood lashing is an important part of Islamist Islam, whether you oppose or support it. I don't think we can take Dr. Homa Darabi site's word for it when it comes to the reason she was punished, but there can be little doubt lashing is intended to, and usually does leave the major bruises pictured in the image. --Leroy65X 15:31, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Khodayar,

I could not get to the picture from the link below. However, you can use any picture or articles you like from our website with a reference to homa.org.

Parvin Darabi <Homa@Homa.org>

On Apr 28, 2007, at 12:04 AM, Khodayar Bahrami wrote:

> Dr. Homa Darabi Foundation

> Date & Time: 4/28/2007 3:04:21 AM

> -----------

> Name: Khodayar Bahrami

> Email: khodayar_bahrami@yahoo.co.uk

> Phone:

> -----------

> Address 1:

> Address 2:

> City, State Zip: , _Not Available

> Country: United Kingdom

> -----------

> Permission for publishin the Picture

> ++++

> Re: http://www.homa.org/Processing/ImageProcess.asp?

> PictureUploadID=2065691419 Dear Sir or madam I wish to obtain a

> permission to publish the above picture in Wikipedia. Since there

> is no copyright on your website, therefore the picture has already

> been obtained; however, at the moment the said establishment

> requires a permission for the image otherwise would be deleted

> soon. I would be grateful if you kindly forward me a permission.

> Kind Regards K. Bahrami

Permission from the Source

The following is the copy of the second email regarding license.

To: "Khodayar Bahrami" <khodayar_bahrami@yahoo.co.uk>

From: "Parvin Darabi" <Homa@Homa.org> View Contact Details

Subject: To whom it may concern

Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:04:37 -0700

Parvin Darabi <Homa@Homa.org> wrote:

This is to certify that Khodayar Bahrami has our permission to post

and or display the image on

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Image:HomaDarabi.jpg

taken from our website www.homa.org. The picture was sent to Dr. Homa

Darabi Foundation by a woman in Iran who was lashed for being in

presence of unrelated men without proper hijab in a party.

Parvin Darabi president

Dr. Homa Darabi Foundation

www.homa.org

530-582-4197

← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 08:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a valid permission letter. First of all, it needs to be forwarded to the copyrights department of wikipedia so that a ticket can be issued for the image, not posted here like this. Second, this image is still not free. Permission has been given to only ParthianShot. It can be deleted under speedy deletion criteria I3. The foundation has given permission to only display the image on the image page and hence it cannot be used in any article. Secondly, "for wikipedia" permissions are no longer accepted. - Aksi_great (talk) 13:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you forward your correspondence to permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org? --Iamunknown 02:39, 7 May 2007 (UTC) Additionally I am concerned that there are conflicting licensing statements on the image description page. --02:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: User:ParthianShot has since been indefinitely blocked. ITAQALLAH 20:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

Notability of the org is not established. There are thousands of similar orgs out there. Therefore the image processing cannot be fully trusted. I've already talked about this point at the Sharia talk page. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 17:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As per Aksi great, the current procedure is not correct. Please follow the procedure explained by AG and IMU above. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 17:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per FayssalF and nom. seemingly no reliable verification available for image. ITAQALLAH 20:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Could someone tell me what email Parvin Darabi needs to send to Wikipedia in order to release this image to the public? I can then email her back and request her to do so. Image notability is not of concern. Flogging has been done in Iran many times and this is what happens to a woman when you flog her. There can be nothing fake about it. --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 13:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JillJohn.jpg

Image:JillJohn.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).

not enough source information to verify the claim this image is promotional. Abu badali ^(talk) 22:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PeterBergmanJack.jpg

Image:PeterBergmanJack.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).

cbs.com is not a source for promo material. Our use replaces the market role for this image (illustrate a webpage about a fictional character) Abu badali ^(talk) 22:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why the CBS images should be deleted. A lot of Wikipedia images come from sites such as CBS. These images are better than screenshots because they better illustrate the characters' personality, etc. Plus, many of the CBS images appear on various other sites as well. As long as they are clearly sourced and there is a fair use rationale and copyright information, there is no reason why they cannot be used on Wikipedia. Kogsquinge 00:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abu is right. "Promotional" means not that somebody else has used the image for promotional purposes, but that somebody has explicitly released the image to be used by others for promotional purposes. Not the case here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dt_yr_act_large_bmaitland.jpg

Image:Dt_yr_act_large_bmaitland.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).

cbs.com is not a source for promo material. Our use replaces the market role for this image (illustrate a webpage about a fictional character) Abu badali ^(talk) 22:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why the CBS images should be deleted. A lot of Wikipedia images come from sites such as CBS. These images are better than screenshots because they better illustrate the characters' personality, etc. Plus, many of the CBS images appear on various other sites as well. As long as they are clearly sourced and there is a fair use rationale and copyright information, there is no reason why they cannot be used on Wikipedia. Kogsquinge 00:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AmberMoore2006.jpg

Image:AmberMoore2006.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).

cbs.com is not a source for promo material. Our use replaces the market role for this image (illustrate a webpage about a fictional character) Abu badali ^(talk) 22:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why the CBS images should be deleted. A lot of Wikipedia images come from sites such as CBS. These images are better than screenshots because they better illustrate the characters' personality, etc. Plus, many of the CBS images appear on various other sites as well. As long as they are clearly sourced and there is a fair use rationale and copyright information, there is no reason why they cannot be used on Wikipedia. Kogsquinge 00:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1075.jpg

Image:1075.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Itzik18 (notify | contribs).