Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 November 14
Appearance
November 14
[edit]Image:Scan24.PNG (talk | delete)
[edit]Image:Scan24.jpg (talk | delete)
[edit]- Uploaded by Ricroz (notify | contribs). Original research and speculation in image form; based ona a copyrighted album cover but not actually illustrating the album itself.- Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 08:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Karunaamma (notify | contribs). UE OB CV (unauthorized modification of a copyrighted logo). This image is used only for personal attack on some of the fellow Wikipedians (as in the offiensive userbox User:Lahiru_k/UserBox/Oppose_against_LTTE), and it is not the new LTTE logo as stated in its title. -∞Sechzehn16Talk∞ 10:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- The logo contains the character donkey from the movie Shrek and is an obvious copyright violation since it has been manipulated and inserted into something else. Elalan 20:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- The userbox in User:Lahiru space has subsequently been deleted, I went through the speedy delete procedure. Elalan 22:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by John Spikowski (notify | contribs). orphaned —Roguegeek (talk) 10:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Seekball (notify | contribs). Only used in a speedily deleted article seekball. - Mike Rosoft 13:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Ric36 (notify | contribs). OB redundant of Image:Citifield(1).jpg—ccwaters 14:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Mjsim.jpg (talk | delete)
[edit]- Uploaded by Street walker (notify | contribs). Obsolete; Duplicate of Image:Stranger In Moscow.jpg—Ashadeofgrey (talk · contribs) 18:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Jean-Pol Grandmont (notify | contribs). Copyright violation, I think. - Gphototalk 19:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by CountdownCrispy (notify | contribs). Was used on my userpage, now an unnecessary orphan. — CountdownCrispy ( ? 20:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Cat.PNG (talk | delete)
[edit]- Uploaded by Forgetaboutit4000 (notify | contribs). LQ, date watermark, replaced in Cat and Cuteness articles with better/more appropriate images. howcheng {chat} 21:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Also nominated Image:Nuuro.jpg
- Uploaded by AnDReS123 (notify | contribs). UC, OR These were uploaded for a twice speedy deleted article, Nuuro (as well as Nurro), and now have no use on Wikipedia. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 22:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Lego3400 (notify | contribs). Obsoleted by Image:ChibiChibi.gif.—Masamage 22:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC).
- Uploaded by Zhuge Flea (notify | contribs). Orphan—Lijnema 23:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Zhuge Flea (notify | contribs). Orphan—Lijnema 23:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Irate (notify | contribs). orphaned image, banned user, obsolete PD license Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Commons image coming through -Nv8200p talk 13:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Marsden (notify | contribs). orpahned image, banned user, low composition quality Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Primetime (notify | contribs). orphaned, banned user, duplicate to Image:Early Etruscan C (3rd try).gif Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Why not delete the other one and keep this one? This one has a better name. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 01:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, obviously sideeffect of the complicated upload mechanim. Pavel Vozenilek 23:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Why not delete the other one and keep this one? This one has a better name. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 01:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Primetime (notify | contribs). orphaned, banned user, unencyclopedic Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Primetime (notify | contribs). orphaned, banned user, unencyclpedic Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Script J.gif (talk | delete)
[edit]- Uploaded by Primetime (notify | contribs). orphaned, banned user, unencylopedic Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Script I.gif (talk | delete)
[edit]- Uploaded by Primetime (notify | contribs). orphaned, banned user, unencylopedic Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Primetime (notify | contribs). orphaned, banned user, unencylopedic Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Anittas (notify | contribs). orphaned, banned user Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- There shouldn't be any problem that a GFDL image is orphaned. Anittas presumably took it himself and released it under GFDL. It should probably be moved to Commons, in fact. What if anything is the problem with the licensing? - Jmabel | Talk 01:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Anittas (notify | contribs). orphaned, banned user Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- What does the fact that he's banned have anything to do with it? Khoikhoi 05:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- I could have said absent uploader, but that might imply the user could particpate in the discussion. As a banned user, there is no way he or she will be able to participate. I thought that might be important to some; also indicates that it would be more difficult to re-aquire should it be deleted.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 19:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- He can participate indirectly; he keeps his eyes on things, and he continues to correspond with me and, I presume, other Wikipedians. Again, there was nothing ever about issues of intellectual dishonesty with Anittas, just intemperate remarks about other users and a general lack of sensitivity. - Jmabel | Talk 01:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- I could have said absent uploader, but that might imply the user could particpate in the discussion. As a banned user, there is no way he or she will be able to participate. I thought that might be important to some; also indicates that it would be more difficult to re-aquire should it be deleted.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 19:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- What does the fact that he's banned have anything to do with it? Khoikhoi 05:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- There shouldn't be any problem that a GFDL image is orphaned. Anittas presumably took it himself and released it under GFDL. It should probably be moved to Commons, in fact. What if anything is the problem with the licensing? - Jmabel | Talk 01:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- There are quite a few parks in Malmö [1] (this photo could be Käglingeparken). Pavel Vozenilek 23:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)