Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 November 10

< November 9	November 11 >

November 10

Image:Lp iroquois.pdf (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Mrsmaple (notify | contribs). orphaned document, absent uploader, incorrect PD claim as this is state work not Federal Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MIMC I Version 1.0.pdf (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Mysmartmouth (notify | contribs). orphaned document; this is a copy of a math contest questions, unencyclopedic. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:92 b4c.pdf (talk | delete)

Uploaded by B4Ctom1 (notify | contribs). orphaned document; mis-labled as PD, it is a copyrighted pamplet produced by General Motors Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:39, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what can I do to keep this from being deleted? B4Ctom1 09:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Taking on Goliath.pdf (talk | delete)

Uploaded by A.K.Karthikeyan (notify | contribs). orpahned, absent uploader, this is a how to manual for smaller companies to take on big firms Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kriss Eric A Massachusetts.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by FLlegal77 (notify | contribs). orphaned image, duplicate to Image:Kriss Eric A.jpg, question PD licensing tag Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Turnpike Taskforce Report.pdf (talk | delete)

Uploaded by FLlegal77 (notify | contribs). orpahned document, absent uploader, has a PD claim as a US Federal document, but it was written for the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority. I am unsure about any possible PD claim on state work. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wildwood visitor giude.pdf (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Peter@wildwoodtrust.org (notify | contribs). orpahned document, sole contrebution of uploader, questionable PD claim Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Portraits of Caligula princeps.pdf (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Joe Geranio (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader, this document is the editor's essay or reseach paper, unencylopedic original research Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blank stone.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Frenchkit (notify | contribs). UE, used only for vandalism of Five Pillars of Islam page —Allstar86 06:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:VanderPauwMagneticFieldSetup.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Blair Bonnett (notify | contribs). I uploaded this myself for use in the article Van der Pauw method but have recently replaced it with a more useful self-made image (Image:Van_der_Pauw_Method_-_Hall_Effect.png). As such it is an orphan and I see no point in keeping it. —Blair - Speak to me 07:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tbyrd2.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Weberk45 (notify | contribs). Unencyclopedic; used only on a vanity page which I just tagged for speedy deletion. —Schutz 08:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed the duplicate Image:Tbyrd2.JPG which should be discussed at the same time. Schutz 08:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OrphanBot small.JPG delete)

Uploaded by Simpsons contributor (notify | contribs). Unencyclopedic, personal attack image against OrphanBot. --AAA! ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt the creator intended any harm. Could we ask the creator of OrphanBot if he minds its existance? If he doesn't care, I don't think it would hurt anything to leave it undeleted. --tjstrf Now on editor review! 22:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It may be disparaging, but personally I think it's a cute picture. Keep in mind that I do believe OrphanBot is important and I wish no offense to Carnildo. ★MESSED ROCKER★ 01:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*snigger* Meh... yes, keep it if he doesn't mind – Gurch 01:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, judging by this edit, I think he did mean harm. Anyway, Carnildo has been contacted by someone, so we'll see what he says. --AAA! ^{(talk • contribs)} 04:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And after having a little discussion with the uploader of this image, I saw that he has taken it elswhere. --AAA! ^{(talk • contribs)} 05:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've speedied the image as an attack. It is not fair to put Carnildo on the spot this way, forcing him to be the bad guy by authorizing the deletion. If he does think the image is acceptable and worthwhile, then he may undelete it. ×Meegs 06:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the image is a good joke. I also think Uncyclopedia is the right place for it. --Carnildo 07:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meegs: I wasn't trying to put him on the spot or anything, my apologies if it looked that way. I simply thought that it looked more like BJAODN material than a personal attack, and wondered if Carnildo felt likewise. --tjstrf Now on editor review! 07:27, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why everyone hates OrphanBot. Or maybe it's because I just haven't experienced it. Oh well. --AAA! ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, tjstrf, I know it wasn't your intent. Are we ok now that Carnildo has weighed-in? ×Meegs 08:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the only times I hate orphanbot are the times when there are a bunch of files where the file name gives the source, but since it was never officially labeled it was tagged for deletion as sourceless anyway. Even then, it's still better than if Orphanbot didn't exist and the images were just deleted without warning. --tjstrf Now on editor review! 08:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jar19834.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Rjmccann (notify | contribs). Non-encyclopaedic, orphaned, used in vandalism. [1] --CalendarWatcher 13:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jar19833.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Rjmccann (notify | contribs). Non-encyclopaedic, orphaned, used in vandalism. [2] --CalendarWatcher 13:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:P2230429.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Waynema (notify | contribs). Orphan Nv8200p talk 13:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:P3150002.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Maccano1 (notify | contribs). OR, UE, AB Nv8200p talk 13:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Berlusconi stalin.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Pierpa (notify | contribs). Agency images not permitted. —Arniep 16:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I do not understand your reasoning above. The image is copyrighted but sourced and fair use rationle provided; I believe it fits the FU criteria and adds to the context of the entry where it is used. Please provide further explanation. Thanks.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Fair use image; sourced; adds context to the article where it is used. Hello32020 20:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Replacable fair use image. Hbdragon88
Keep The free use rationale provides adequate enough explanation and would contribute to the article.--Auger Martel 11:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not deleted - In the context of how the image is used in the article, a free replacement does not seem possible. --cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 15:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Q'orianka Kilcher.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Ramirez72 (notify | contribs). Uploader claims image is in public domain, but provides no evidence. —Chowbok ☠ 16:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It appears this image was originally tagged as fair use promo with rationle. It was tagged as replaceable fair use. It seems that the uploader tried to "fix" this by changing the license to a PD claim. I agree with deletion, but under the umbrella of replaceable fair use rather then an incorrect PD claim which could be corrected.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is too funny. Uploader says I've nominated this for deletion because I hate Mexicans. No joke! —Chowbok ☠ 03:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Making fun of me ha vato!,making smart-alec comments. You better be sarcastic homes.--User:Ramirez72 04:32, November 11 2006.

Image:Alofferman02.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Alofferman (notify | contribs). Usage requires permission. Peter O. (Talk) 17:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is an image of me taken by a friend of mine for me. I have my friend's permission to use this photo however I see fit. It only requires permission so that not just anyone can take the photo and, let's say, use it for financial gain. Keep. ~Cookie~ 18:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Anyone can take the photo and use it for financial gain" is what we want. That's the GFDL. —Chowbok ☠ 20:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't aware they Wikipedia was attempting to use their information for finacial gain, particularly people's person photos. I was under the impression it was at least a not for profit (if not non-profit) orginization.... ~Anna~ 05:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It is. But we want everything to be reproduceable by others, even for profit. That's very important to us, and always has been. It mirrors the free-software movement in the computer world. For more information about these issues, including the philosophical justifications, start here: GFDL. —Chowbok ☠ 16:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - So if someone wanted to take my photo from this website and use it for, let's say a porn website, even though it's copywritten and one needs permission to use the photo since it was taken by a friend for my personal use and he copywrites his photos, they would be allowed to take said copywritten photo and use it without my or the photographers permission, which may then cause me grief like being tied up in a libel lawsuit. Wouldn't it be simpler to say "this is a photo of user xyz, you must have xyz's permission to use this photo. To use without permission is going against copywrite laws." I mean, the way it seems to me based on the explantions here there's no personal property allowed on Wikipedia. I would have to release all rights to this image in order to use it at the risk of people abusing it, that seems a bit extreme to me.
    - The word is copyright, not copywrite (sorry just a pet peve). Anyway you don't have to give up all your rights to the image, just just have to allow everyone else to use the copy of it you uploaded to Wikipedia too (with or without permission). However if you release it under a license like GFDL (via the {{GFDL-self}} tag) there are some conditions that make legal "exploitation" of the image hard, such as providing a copy of (or link to) the the full text of the GFDL license and listing all (or up to 5 of) the "authors" of the image) and that any works based on it must also be released under the same license and so on. Though basicaly yeah, if you don't want something used by others outside of your controll then don't upload it to Wikipedia, because we require user contributions to be free content. --Sherool (talk) 10:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gene-sarazen.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Robertkeller (notify | contribs). Public domain status appears wrong. Peter O. (Talk) 18:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gen.png (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Guanaco (notify | contribs). Orphaned, low quality. Peter O. (Talk) 18:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete delete) as well. It's the same image in BMP format. —Guan aco 00:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wikiwhite.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Webkid (notify | contribs). Orphan. Peter O. (Talk) 18:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Male pubic hair3.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Richmal (notify | contribs). orpahned, absent uploader, YAPP Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 18:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Male breast.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Svartulfr1 (notify | contribs). orpahned image, absent uploader, other images are already available Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 18:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Man Shaving Pubic Hair.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Svartulfr1 (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 18:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ravenwoodlogo1.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by VmillerKS (notify | contribs). Orphaned, probable absent uploader. Was uploaded as part of a rather sad attempt at viral marketing for the CBS TV show Jericho [3]; the article in which it was used has been speedily deleted as spam. —Aaron 19:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Yamcha ssj-l.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by SSJ 5 (notify | contribs). OR, UE- — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 19:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tbyrd.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Weberk45 (notify | contribs). UE and not linked from any page. See also IFD for Image:Tbyrd2.jpg and Image:Tbyrd2.JPG —Schutz 20:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Web 041018-N-0000X-001-1-.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Saltydog70 (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader, duplicate to Image:New US navy Working Uniform.jpg Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 21:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Uneeded. Mhocker 19:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:New uniform.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Saltydog70 (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader, triplicate picture to Image:New US navy Working Uniform.jpg Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 21:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Much better than "New US navy Working Uniform.jpg", higher res, easier to read. Mhocker 19:29, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC02977.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Ganyuanchun (notify | contribs). orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kodi2.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Wthing5 (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kodi.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Wthing5 (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader, duplicate to above Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eurasia3.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Wthing5 (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader, triplicate to above Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eurasia4.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Wthing5 (notify | contribs). orpahned, absent uploader, 4th copy of image Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eurasia5.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Wthing5 (notify | contribs). orpahned, absent uploader, 5th copy of same image Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LogoFreeview.gif (talk | delete)

~~Uploaded by UTV2 (notify | contribs). Picture orphaned and copyright violation of the Freeview logo.~~ —tgheretford (talk) 22:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update - copyright information added, picture still orphaned. --tgheretford (talk) 15:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn - concerns in the nomination have been resolved. --tgheretford (talk) 17:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Boerboel.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Denhulde (notify | contribs). orpahned image, absent uploader Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On Commons now. --cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 15:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Roger 3 053105.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Peter Mollard (notify | contribs). orpahned image, absent uploader, low quality Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Smallbull.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Peter Mollard (notify | contribs). orphaned image, absent uploader, I question the release of rights as done by uploader, it appears to be a logo of sorts but no source is provided. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]