Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 July 6

July 6

Uploaded by BaylorPinoy (notify). CV - Magazine cover being used in an article about the subject on the cover, but the articles doesn't discuss the cover at all. No fair use rationale, and the name of the magazine is cut off. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 13:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Goodhil05.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by BaylorPinoy (notify). OR cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 13:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:March2006 009.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Nicoleriche (notify). UE, OR. howch e ng {chat} 16:08, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Julija Tchepalova.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Miller17CU94 (notify). CV- Sue Anne 16:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kateřina Neumannová.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Miller17CU94 (notify). CV- Image is clearly marked as copyright by Reuters. Sue Anne 16:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Birger Ruud.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Miller17CU94 (notify). CV- Taken from the IOC page, which is normally very strict about any of its copyrights. Sue Anne 16:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted from June 30 (uploader not notified): Image:Rouge2.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Tyler Faith (notify). Orphan Vic Vipr 00:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CIMG2137.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Some Name (notify). OR, PUI (image claims {{pd-self}})- — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 17:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Einstein patentoffice.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Stevertigo (notify). CV. see commons:Template:Deletion requests#Image:Albert Einstein Swss Patent Office clerk 1905.jpg- Shizhao 18:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert back to the original "fair use" tag and make a fair use case. Lupo 19:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted. howch e ng {chat} 17:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Image:Sw-1831.jpg~~ (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Ecco1983 (notify). Image is described as a "pomotional [sic] picture" but tagged as {{film-screenshot}}. It is uncertain which of the previous it is.- Lord Deskana (talk) 18:17, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader not notified. Tagging as orphaned fair use image instead. howch e ng {chat} 17:37, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pdficon small.gif, derivative ie. fair use work being used as a marker for external pdf files. Not necessary and an illegitimate fair use.--Peta 03:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - A free alternative is available, Image:Noia 64 mimetypes pdf.png and is used in {{PDFlink}}. Iola k ana|^T 17:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~Delete~~ - although present usage complies with Adobe licensing guidelines, the free icon will work just as well. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 01:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC) BigDT has a point, images with a clear fair use rationale and permission trump free images that may infringe copyright. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 02:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - As a point of clarification, trademark and copyright are two different issues. If I print t-shirts that have a logo that looks a lot like a corporate logo, even though I may not have actually photoshopped the logo, that is a trademark infringement. It is not a copyright violation. BigDT 03:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep unless I'm missing something. The "free" Image:Noia 64 mimetypes pdf.png is almost certainly a trademark infringement. Even though it may not actually have been a photoshop of the Acrobat logo, it is obviously an infringement of their trademark. On the other hand, Image:Pdficon small.gif is being used for a purpose specifically allowed by Adobe. BigDT 02:25, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Free image > nonfree image. Trademark infringement is not relevant, we're not diluting the trademark by using it here. Stifle (talk) 23:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Naming an icon using "pdf", making it look similar to Adobe's trademark, and placing it in the vicinity of a bunch of pdf files sounds to me like it would cause confusion and thus dilution. I don't claim to be a trademark expert, though, and I could be wrong. (I deal with copyright occasionally issues IRL, though I would not claim by any stretch of the imagination to be an expert, but I know little/nothing about trademark law.) BigDT 02:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Gopichettypalayammap2.gif (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Girish.la (notify). Blatant copyvio with no hope of fair use claim, claimed to be "drawn by self and and no rights reserved"

Image:Drolta.gif replaced with Image:Drolta.png. Guermantes 03:54, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Factoryclipart.gif. Not free of usage restrictions. ed g2s • talk 17:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:HalfLife2 FastHeadcrab.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by ZS (notify). OB by Image:HL2Fastcrab.jpg. ╫ ２５ ^{◀RingADing▶} 19:08, 6 July 2006 (UTC) ╫[reply]

Image:HalfLife2 PoisonHeadcrab.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by ZS (notify). OB by Image:HL2Poisoncrab.jpg. ╫ ２５ ^{◀RingADing▶} 19:08, 6 July 2006 (UTC) ╫[reply]

Image:Jason Boylan.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by That-guy-u-wish-u-were (notify). OR, UE, also seems like an attack photo. --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 19:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as attack image I8 - I have tagged it as such BigDT 00:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:250px-Tux.svg01.png (talk | delete)

Uploaded by DrUnix (notify). Unused and just the MediaWiki-generated PNG version of Image:Tux.svg. --BrownCow  (how now?) 21:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mafkham.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Zereshk (notify). Invalid fair use - the image is a picture of a building being used in an article about the city where the building is located. Fails WP:FAIR#Policy #8. Also, the source of the image is not clearly given.- BigDT 23:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, fair use for for educational non-profit purpose on relevant article on topic--Striver 01:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:FAIR. Images are not automatically fair use just because we want to use them. There are two sets of rules - under "Counterexamples" and "Policy". If you go down the list and find a single counterexample that is met or find a single policy that is not met, the image cannot be used. In this case, #8 under policy is not met. BigDT 01:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This image doesnt fall under any of these regulations for deletion because it is leaglly and officially not protected by US copyright law, as stipulated in the United States Copyright office Circuilar 38. The use of fairuse tag was merely arbitrary. It can be corrected.--Zereshk 01:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: Jimbo stated here that we should respect Iranian copyright law, regardless of whether the US has a treaty with them. Thus, any images from Iran should be deleted as a copyright violation unless a valid fair use justification can be given. If interested, see also the horribly segmented discussion on my talk page and Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Can I use..., as well as some vote stacking. BigDT 23:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this would only constitute fair use in an article about the building itself, and even then, an Iranian Wikipedian could just go take their own picture of it, so it would still fail WP:FUC #1. howch e ng {chat} 18:23, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Helplessness.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Iwasblueonce (notify). Unused and unencyclopedic. Oddly enough, second version uploaded by same user is completely different too. --BrownCow  (how now?) 23:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CraigMounts.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Lilashleh (notify). not notable, unencyclopedic, see also Craig Mounts bio/memorial article. Also possible copyright vio, as it sure looks like a senior picture to me. -- MrDolomite | Talk 06:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CraigMounts1.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Lilashleh (notify). not notable, unencyclopedic, see also Craig Mounts bio/memorial article, see also Image:CraigMounts2.jpg. -- MrDolomite | Talk 06:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]