Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 August 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


August 20

[edit]
Uploaded by Assawyer (notify | contribs). Orphaned, made obsolete by Image:US 202.svg. TMF T - C 00:45, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Brian the Fat (notify | contribs). OR, UE. Sango123 01:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Hanako (notify | contribs). wrong file
Uploaded by ?? (notify | contribs). Unencyclopedic image Daniel Olsen 03:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This image is on Commons. Request its deletion there. howcheng {chat} 20:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Moonrat506 (notify | contribs). Unencyclopedic image Daniel Olsen 03:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Krukkrewxcom (notify | contribs). Orphan, no lisence info, possible copyvio Sabine's Sunbird talk 05:23, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Rvb Strongbad (notify | contribs). No concievable use. Scienceman123 06:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not deleted. Image is in use in List of Wonderfalls episodes. howcheng {chat} 20:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Philwelch (notify | contribs). Orphaned image. User has blocked himself indefinitely. Dionyseus 08:49, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Primetime (notify | contribs). TThe creator of this file was permabanned for egregious copyvios. In some cases he claimed elaborate diagrams as his own work. However diagrams like this one, which is clearly his own work, indicate a very low ability to create professional graphs. That's why I'm nominating it for deletion. Two users have come to the image talk page, Image talk:Fiat Acquisitions over Time.GIF, just to complain about how amateurish this graph appears. "LQ". Will Beback 09:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't know what the appropriate criteria for deletion are, so I don't know whether it's elligible. I only know this image is of little to no informative value and actually more confusing than anything else (abstracting from its graphic quality), so certainly it should be removed from the article, as it compromises its overall quality. I see no use for this image in articles, so it would be a permanent orphan. Perhaps this is a reason for deletion, but deleting it is not really that important to me, just making sure it doesn't appear in articles. It would also be nice if somebody could make a good graph for this topic, which should not be too hard. Bravada, talk - 10:48, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Philwelch (notify | contribs). Orphaned image. Uploader has banned himself indefinitely for incivility. Dionyseus 09:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by WillowW (me). Uploaded better image with same name at Commons. Thanks! Willow 11:50, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Digitallyme5 (notify | contribs). The image doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia.(UE) See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netdemons.co.uk. ST47 11:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Sleepyasthesouth (notify | contribs). UE, OR, CV—♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 11:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by NeonChimpanzee (notify | contribs). UE, OR —♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 12:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dvdkdrmn (notify | contribs). UE, OR—♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 12:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Asdas (notify | contribs). UE, OR—♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 12:10, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • The image is based on an attributed peer-reviewed source, where full details are provided, the authors of which include Profs. Emil Wolf and Daniel James, who are leading experts in their field. ScienceApologist's personal view can not be verified, whereas the original diagram can. --Iantresman 19:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So far, it's ScienceApologist's word against a primary source. Cite sources for your argument, or retract it. Besides, why does the image need to be deleted? Surely, if indeed your argument is correct, the image can be adjusted and improved to suit? Iantresman, can you provide the cite for the article so everyone can compare notes? Jon 12:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Found it - sorry! article full text
Not deleted. howcheng {chat} 20:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Darthgriz98 (notify | contribs). (Not an orphan) A photo of an adult item in front of a computer. Occupying most of the image is the computer monitor and on that monitor is someone's IM session. Because a disproportionately large amount of this image consists of a copyrighted piece of software, I have trouble considering it to be a free image. BigDT 16:24, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Kwame Nkrumah 16:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Tron X (notify | contribs). OR, user's only contribution, questionable PD-self tag BigDT 17:35, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Rabunbike (notify | contribs). Source is Google Maps or Google Earth, tagged with {{windows-software-screenshot}}, being used as a map, not as a software screenshot. —Bkell (talk) 21:43, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Fast track (notify | contribs). Collage of logos of television stations, essentially amounting to a gallery of fair-use images, generally considered not to qualify for fair use. —Bkell (talk) 21:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Fast track (notify | contribs). Tagged {{Promotional}}, but this is a BBC image. As such, it fails fair use criteria; see fair-use counterexample number 5. —Bkell (talk) 21:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jackson744 (notify | contribs). OR PQ AU? OB (Comm) Image:Kaldor-Hicks-en.svg NeonMerlin 22:45, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not deleted. An important part of the history of Image:Kaldor-Hicks-en.svg. howcheng {chat} 20:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by LeSophisticate (notify | contribs). OR, UE, previously used only for vanity purposes in article which has been deleted. Kinu t/c 22:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jczup (notify | contribs). OR, tagged as PD because of a 100+ year age. Though the logo itself may be 100+ years old (I have no idea one way or the other) this particular representation obviously is not. BigDT 22:56, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jczup (notify | contribs). OR, also tagged as 100+ years old, also obviously not 100+ years old. BigDT 22:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jczup (notify | contribs). OR, also tagged as 100+ years old, also obviously not 100+ years old unless someone has a time machine BigDT 22:58, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jczup (notify | contribs). (Not an orphan) Tagged as PD-self, but gives a source URL of http://www.thetaalpha.org ... it is highly unlikely that the author is the author of this photo BigDT 23:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jczup (notify | contribs). OR BigDT 23:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jczup (notify | contribs). OR, tagged as PD-self, likely false BigDT 23:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jczup (notify | contribs). OR, tagged as PD-self, but I'm assuming, based on the above images, that it is not BigDT 23:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jczup (notify | contribs). (Not an orphan) I can't find the exact source, but a cropped version of this image is on http://www.thetaalpha.org/alpha/involvement.htm. I doubt it is a free image BigDT 23:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jczup (notify | contribs). OR, tagged as GFDL-self, but thetaalpha.org is cited as a source BigDT 23:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Eadbortman (notify | contribs). OR vanity pic BigDT 23:12, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Forehand (notify | contribs). OR, tagged as PD, but no explanation as to why. At any rate, it is orphaned. BigDT 23:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Hardas5a (notify | contribs). OR, no evidence that the source website has released this image under the GFDL BigDT 23:16, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]