Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 April 10

April 10

Uploaded by Gerald Farinas (notify). OR. Fair use image replaced with a freely licenced equivalent -JeremyA 02:13, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Queeniemusic (notify). Image was uploaded for use in a vanity article that has since been deleted. Uploader has no edits before or since 20 December. -Icarus 05:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Queeniemusic (notify). Same as above. However, I do not know if this image was ever actually used in an article. -Icarus 05:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Arights (notify). This image is of poor quality and cropped beyond recognition. It's practically impossible for anyone to make out what it depicts. —Psychonaut 07:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep like earlier The image was already for deletion. I spoke with Nv8200p over a long time and Nv8200p helped me get it in approvable shape. The cropping was done because it is fair use and fair use. The quality reduction was done because fair use requires a reduced quality. The unvandalized version of furvert http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Furvert&oldid=46280786 has a description that clarifies. To my knowledge Nv8200p is in charge of the images for deletion and Nv8200p previously decided it was acceptable. Psychonaut would it fully please you to have a high-qualty uncropped version? I will do the work of making another image if you can help with the vandalism from admin ContiE of the article furvert. Arights 08:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it would fully please me to have a high-quality uncropped image, but only if it can be used under the GFDL or another permissive license. If the high-quality uncropped version of this image is not licensable for use on Wikipedia, then I suggest you find a different image. —Psychonaut 08:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No admin is "in charge" of images for deletion. Any admin may process images based on th facts presented -Nv8200p talk 02:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The quality of this picture is terrible. --Muchosucko 04:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader has since been indefinitely blocked. [2] —Psychonaut 11:28, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. --Conti|✉ 13:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by User:Ta bu shi da yu (notify). Use is inconsistent with fair use tag requiring that it be to illustrate an article, or part of an article, which specifically describes the issue in question or its cover. —Tomyumgoong 13:06, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely object! This:

Illustrates the goatse.cx article - at least until it was taken off the article by User:Tomyumgoong. That is totally inappropriate, I have rolled back as I count that as vandalism.
It is an appropriate use of the image: it illustrates the article, and not only that does it in a transformative fashion. - Ta bu shi da yu 13:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To admins: there is no consensus to delete this image. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Airbus logo.jpg – way too big to be a fair use image. Also saved as JPEG, when it should be PNG. Replaced by Image:Airbus logo.png. –Mysid 13:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Replaced fair use image should use {{or-fu-re}}, since it's a speedy deletion candidates --Hunter 17:53, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:JEN.jpg (talk | delete)