Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Type 1934-class destroyers/archive1

5 articles

Contributor(s): Iazyges, Sturmvogel 66

All the articles of this Good Topic nomination are GA; and all are very related, as all four non-lead articles are ships of the lead article's class. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 13:53, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should be consistency in format: three call the specific page references Notes, while Leberecht Maass calls them Citations. Z1 also has a section called Service history, while for the others it's Construction and career. In Georg Thiele, there does not need to be a separate subsection for the website, and the note referencing it should actually match its name: "Diving the Wrecks of Narvik", not just "Narvik Wrecks". Reywas92^Talk 08:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Reywas92: Done. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 13:48, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Decent collection of articles. Reywas92^Talk 22:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support All four ships in this class have Good Articles. –Vami _IV✠ 01:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Shouldn't the lead article be marked as A-class? Kees08 (Talk) 23:47, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- MilHist A class isn't recognized outside MilHistory, so they remain GA's for GTC purposes.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Updated some page names to reflect recent page moves.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good work, as usual. Kees08 (Talk) 03:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic - GamerPro64 01:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]