Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Dangerously in Love/archive1
Dangerously in Love
[edit]Note that this was a Good Topics nomination - rst20xx (talk) 16:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
| Main page | Articles |
 Dangerously in Love
|
"Crazy in Love" ·  "What's It Gonna Be" ·  "Baby Boy" · "Me, Myself and I" · "Naughty Girl"
|
What's It Gonna Be (Beyoncé Knowles song) was too short for a GA so it was peer reviewed instead. Gary King (talk) 19:27, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - per the X-Men nom. Also, the peer review of What's It Gonna Be (Beyoncé Knowles song) hasn't finished yet. Also, I would like to see it try for GA, and fail solely due to being inherently short, before I will support - rst20xx (talk) 23:58, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, also, you're missing Dangerously in Love (song). And Work It Out (Beyoncé Knowles song) and '03 Bonnie & Clyde should possibly be included too. The reasons pile up - rst20xx (talk) 03:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- What's the current requirement for album topics? The precedent set has been only the album's singles are required. Does this include international singles? Where do we stand now? Gary King (talk) 04:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- I believe it is ok to be less stringent about the broadness of the topic for GTCs, and for example allow GTs only with singles but relegate the FTs that contain only singles (unless there is a veeery good /clear reason not to include other songs). Nergaal (talk) 04:57, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- What's the current requirement for album topics? The precedent set has been only the album's singles are required. Does this include international singles? Where do we stand now? Gary King (talk) 04:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, also, you're missing Dangerously in Love (song). And Work It Out (Beyoncé Knowles song) and '03 Bonnie & Clyde should possibly be included too. The reasons pile up - rst20xx (talk) 03:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- I think it should be the same for both FT and GTs; the only difference between the two processes should only be the quality of the articles. Anyways, I don't care if it's singles or not, but it'd be nice to have that cleared up one way or the other. Gary King (talk) 05:10, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think the same standards should be imposed on GTs and FTs, but I guess that should be figured out in the future by consensous. Nergaal (talk) 05:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Regarding the non-single songs, as far as I'm aware, no precedent has been set, but I would oppose if they weren't included myself - rst20xx (talk) 15:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think the same standards should be imposed on GTs and FTs, but I guess that should be figured out in the future by consensous. Nergaal (talk) 05:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- I think it should be the same for both FT and GTs; the only difference between the two processes should only be the quality of the articles. Anyways, I don't care if it's singles or not, but it'd be nice to have that cleared up one way or the other. Gary King (talk) 05:10, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Note the nomination's name has been changed due to the article being moved from Dangerously In Love to Dangerously in Love (a basic capitalization fix). Xnux the Echidna 01:10, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator - rst20xx (talk) 15:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)