Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Bridgewater Causeway Crop.jpg

Bridgewater Causeway

Reason: The original version is more asthetically pleasing and gives more context to the bridge location.
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bridgewater Bridge
Nominator: Noodle snacks (talk)

Delist and Replace — Noodle snacks (talk) 09:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and Replace per nom. The fuzz in the grass doesn't bother me. --Janke | Talk 13:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and Replace. As per my support in its original nomination. I like the context it provides. Spencer^T♦^C 02:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The foreground IMO isn't very aesthetic - in fact I'd prefer it if this pano had been taken from the little pier on the left and the foreground completely done away with. Also given that this was closed only a month ago, it might be a good idea to let the people who voted for the cropped version know about this delist nom... --Fir0002 04:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Personally I prefer the non cropped one, but this was just voted on and consensus preferred the crop. Nothing else has changed. Mfield (talk) 19:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Have a look at a nomination, A couple of people prefered the crop, but the majority of votes supported the original version. I don't consider this a consensus. Noodle snacks (talk) 23:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you that the decision looks borderline. There were mentions of problems in the foreground before the crop and votes that didn't get changed after the crop was added. Really this should have been given extra time for consensus during its FP nom. Mfield (talk) 23:38, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I restitched this and uploaded over the original (before the nomination), but the restitch was probably worse. Dschwen later undid it in the german FPC nomination. The grass is better in the reverted version so it isn't entirely the same as the one in the fpc nom. Therefore its probably worth a look since it fixes some of the crop people's complaints. Noodle snacks (talk) 00:05, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus MER-C 23:59, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]