Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Sunflowers.jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2010 at 00:24:25 (UTC)
- Reason
- Poor quality, esp. background, frankly it would never pass if nominated at FPC today. EDIT: Actually it turns out someone uploaded a stretched out version of the original image, though the quality and lighting of that one is still sketchy.
- Articles this image appears in
- Sunflower
- Previous nomination/s
- Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/October-2004#Field_of_Sunflowers
- Nominator
- I'ḏ♥One
- Delist — I'ḏ♥One 00:24, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delist The quality is terrible when viewed in full size. Shame, looked nice small. S Masters (talk) 14:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delist. Quality is lacking, colours are unnatural. J Milburn (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delist Wouldn't be too difficult to replicate though at thumb it looks pretty good. In addition to the above the lens distortion is clearly visible along the horizon line. Noodle snacks (talk) 21:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delist Blue, red and saturation are all very comprehensively blown. Though I can see some EV in showing different stages of ripening and the scale and exactitude of cultivation, the overall impression is that this is from an epoch when aesthetic value was considered more important than it is today. I would like to express "no prejudice" as to whether the larger upload is genuine or artificially upsampled. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 10:57, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Delisted —Maedin\talk 20:06, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
