Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Albert Harris - Coconut shy B.jpg
Albert Harris[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 May 2011 at 02:40:18 (UTC)
- Reason
- Too small.
- Articles this image appears in
- Coconut shy, Funfair
- Previous nomination/s
- Not available
- Nominator
- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
Delist — King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC)- Neutral I love the atmosphere... --kaʁstn 09:07, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- It is not too small; it meets the size requirement, so your reasoning is insufficient. Also, why say no previous nominations are available? There are two: original nomination, previous delist attempt. Maedin\talk 22:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- It would be reasonable to describe it as above the minimum but still "too small" to fill its encyclopedic purpose. I've no opinion on this image at this time, but pooh-poohing any argument that an image is small if it is above 1000px wide or tall is not particularly useful. J Milburn (talk) 10:00, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't pooh-pooh an 'argument'—there wasn't one. I invited him to expand on his reasoning, as his stated one was factually incorrect. Seems fairly obvious and useful to first ascertain whether or not he had simply misunderstood the size requirements, by correcting and asking for more detail. Maedin\talk 14:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Actually my main reason for withdrawing is that I was convinced by reading the opposition to the previous delisting nom. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:22, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't pooh-pooh an 'argument'—there wasn't one. I invited him to expand on his reasoning, as his stated one was factually incorrect. Seems fairly obvious and useful to first ascertain whether or not he had simply misunderstood the size requirements, by correcting and asking for more detail. Maedin\talk 14:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- It would be reasonable to describe it as above the minimum but still "too small" to fill its encyclopedic purpose. I've no opinion on this image at this time, but pooh-poohing any argument that an image is small if it is above 1000px wide or tall is not particularly useful. J Milburn (talk) 10:00, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Withdrawn now that I see there has been a previous failed delisting attempt. The file description page didn't have a link, and because of the low resolution I assumed it was something from 2004 and therefore didn't have a nomination page. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:07, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept --Jujutacular talk 04:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Withdrawn. Jujutacular talk 04:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
