Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tasman Bridge Dusk.jpg

Support as nominator --Flying Freddy (talk) 11:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Unfortunately doesn't seem to be a convincing HDR image. The luminosity of the image seems a bit mixed up. It is possible that I'm wrong and it was naturally lit this way, but I have my doubts. The clouds and land on the left are very dark, but the land/sky through the bridge is significantly brighter. Decent composition though. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 11:28, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for pointing that out, I revised the image and reposted as edit 1. Flying Freddy (talk) 11:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Much better in the edit. Image quality still isn't great though. The detail is a bit soft and nothing looks critically sharp. Good for the article but I'm not convinced that it is FP quality. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 12:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Sorry, it looks great at thumbnail size but the composition of the image doesn't make it very useful from an encyclopaedia point of view imo. Noodle snacks (talk) 11:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose composition give low EV, HDR effect too strong which overly bright foreground. --Leivick (talk) 20:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Way to much HDR. I also want to see a little more of the bridge, and lighting is definitely a concern. Spencer^T♦^C 21:04, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 08:12, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]