Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Clouds over hills.jpg

Clouds over Hills.

Impressive image of high quality. Describes a hill perfectly and also a good weather with Cumulus clouds. It appears in the Hill article and it's taken by: Victor Szalvay

Re Nominate and support. - Arad 12:24, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. A beautiful photo with rich colors, but one that does not well illustrate its stated subject. SteveHopson 17:09, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose. Per SteveHopson. Nauticashades 18:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Slightly tilted(unless that's just me), not enough focus on the subject, and I'd really like to see landscapes especially in larger size. HeartOfGold 19:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose See my comments for Fields of Gold above. Landscapes need big scale, give us more than 1000 pixels across. Still, love the photo itself. --Bridgecross 02:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Severely uneven polarization; no clear subject or point of interest; tilted horizon. -- Moondigger 19:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tilted - Adrian Pingstone 22:16, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Subject unclear, and not really big enough to show something as large as a hill HighInBC 02:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose subject matter very weak, its a decent photo though Michaeln36
~~Ineligible~~ -- licensing. howch e ng {chat} 00:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- After email communication with the photographer, he has changed the licensing to cc-by-sa. howch e ng {chat} 23:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Tilted horizon, dark patch in the top left corner for some reason. --WikiSlasher 14:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support This picture has lovely colors, and illustrates well what a hill is (there are few hills where I live so I should know). However, more information about the clouds should be given. This image is comparable to the FPs View from Connor's Hill panorama, and Great Dividing Range. AndonicO 16:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Tilted, no particular subject, heavy polarisation in top left is distracting. A bit feeble as a representation of Hill (although that article seems to be lacking a good illustration). --Yummifruitbat 00:55, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this looks beautiful. I may even adopt it for use as my background. TomStar81 (Talk) 01:19, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's certainly better than the default Windows XP background. --WikiSlasher 09:42, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Somewhat pretty, but not really that encyclopedic. Maybe it could find a more appropriate home in the landscape art article? Staxringold _talk^contribs 15:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, I've done that. Arad 15:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good photo for a hill. Also a good example of cumulus clouds(?). I find it a very good quality too. Don bertone 12:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 04:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]